Literature DB >> 24196389

Underlying diagnosis predicts patient-reported outcomes after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Jasvinder A Singh1, David G Lewallen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of underlying diagnosis with outcomes after revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
METHODS: For this cohort study we used prospectively collected data from the Mayo Clinic Total Joint Registry on all revision TKA patients from 1993 to 2005 with 2- or 5-year response to a validated knee questionnaire that assesses pain and function. We used logistic regression to assess the odds of moderate-severe activities of daily living (ADL) limitations and moderate-severe index knee pain 2 and 5 years after revision TKA. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs are presented.
RESULTS: The underlying diagnosis for the 2- and 5-year cohorts was loosening, wear or osteolysis in 73% and 75%; dislocation, bone or prosthesis fracture, instability or non-union in 17% and 15%; and failed prior arthroplasty with components removed or infection in 11% and 11%, respectively. In multivariable adjusted analyses that included preoperative status, compared with patients with loosening/wear/osteolysis, patients with dislocation/fracture/instability/non-union had an OR of 2.1 for moderate-severe ADL limitation (95% CI 1.3, 3.1, P < 0.001) and those with failed prior arthroplasty/infection had an OR of 1.1 (95% CI 0.6, 1.8, P = 0.4). At 5 years, differences were no longer significant. In multivariable adjusted analyses, compared with patients with loosening/wear/osteolysis, patients with dislocation/fracture/instability/non-union had an OR of 2.0 for moderate-severe pain (95% CI 1.3, 3.1, P < 0.01) at 2 years and an OR of 2.1 (95% CI 1.3, 3.8, P = 0.01) at 5 years. Failed prior arthroplasty/infection was not significantly different than the reference category.
CONCLUSION: Underlying diagnosis is independently associated with ADL limitations and pain after revision TKA. This information can help patients have realistic expectations of outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty; joint replacement; osteoarthritis; patient-reported outcomes; rheumatoid arthritis; risk factor; total knee replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24196389      PMCID: PMC3894673          DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  29 in total

1.  The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality.

Authors:  R D DRIPPS; A LAMONT; J E ECKENHOFF
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1961-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Pessimistic explanatory style: a psychological risk factor for poor pain and functional outcomes two years after knee replacement.

Authors:  J A Singh; M M O'Byrne; R C Colligan; D G Lewallen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-06

3.  Comparison of the responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score with generic measures for hip function in osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  H L Hoeksma; C H M Van Den Ende; H K Ronday; A Heering; F C Breedveld
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Patient factors predict periprosthetic fractures after revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Matthew R Jensen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Patterns of rehabilitation after hip arthroplasty and the association with outcomes: an episode of care view.

Authors:  Wenqiang Tian; Gerben DeJong; Michael C Munin; Randall Smout
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.159

6.  Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991-2010.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Xin Lu; Stephen L Kates; Jasvinder A Singh; Yue Li; Brian R Wolf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Predictors of moderate-severe functional limitation 2 and 5 years after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Megan M O'Byrne; W Scott Harmsen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Preoperative risks and outcomes of hip and knee arthroplasty in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Frances Weaver; Denise Hynes; William Hopkinson; Richard Wixson; Shukri Khuri; Jennifer Daley; William G Henderson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Predictors of moderate-severe functional limitation after primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA): 4701 TKAs at 2-years and 2935 TKAs at 5-years.

Authors:  J A Singh; M O'Byrne; S Harmsen; D Lewallen
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Role of obesity on the risk for total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert Bourne; Shaheena Mukhi; Naisu Zhu; Margaret Keresteci; Mihaela Marin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  3 in total

1.  Racial disparities in total ankle arthroplasty utilization and outcomes.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Rekha Ramachandran
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.156

2.  Arthroplasty studies with greater than 1000 participants: analysis of follow-up methods.

Authors:  Muhammad B Tariq; José F Vega; Robert Westermann; Morgan Jones; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2019-05-07

3.  Impact of comorbid conditions on outcomes of hip and knee replacement surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bélène Podmore; Andrew Hutchings; Jan van der Meulen; Ajay Aggarwal; Sujith Konan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.