Literature DB >> 26298535

Prevalence and risk factors for intra-operative periprosthetic fractures in one thousand eight hundred and seventy two patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study.

Walter Ricioli1, Marcelo Cavalheiro Queiroz1, Rodrigo Pereira Guimarães1, Emerson K Honda1, Giancarlo Polesello1, Patricia M de Moraes Barros Fucs2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the frequency and type of intra-operative periprosthetic fractures and to describe risk factors in a single tertiary, public hospital, so that these events could be prevented, even among less experienced surgeons.
METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study, based on medical records and imaging exams from the archives of a public, tertiary hospital, from April 1998 to October 2013. All consecutive patients submitted to total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the study period were evaluated, excluding unipolar or bipolar arthroplasty, surgery for the osteosynthesis of periprosthetic fractures, surgical procedure to clean infection site without component substitution and not arthroplastic surgery. Data were analyzed with chi-squared test and multivariate Cox regression.
RESULTS: In the study period, 1,872 THA (1,728 patients) were performed and analyzed, with 144 bilateral cases. In 173 cases, patients had undergone surgical procedures other than THA previously, and in only 260 the surgery consisted of revision THA. There were only two cases of resection THA. Among all patients 101 intra-operative periprosthetic fractures occurred. The univariate analysis revealed a significantly higher risk of intra-operative fractures in female patients, aged more than 65 years, with indication of primary THA and the presence of a previous hip surgery. It indicated also that revision surgeries were associated with a 2.8-fold higher risk of intra-operative fracture, 2.18-fold risk in a previously operated hip and 3.9-fold in cases of resection THA or revision surgery in two stages.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture is a rare event, and it is associated with revision type surgery and THA in a previously operated hip.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Hip; Hip fractures; Hip prosthesis; Periprosthetic fractures; Replacement; Risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26298535     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2961-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  24 in total

Review 1.  Periprosthetic fracture of the femur after total hip arthroplasty: treatment and results to date.

Authors:  D G Lewallen; D J Berry
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1998

Review 2.  Incidence and predisposing factors of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures: a literature review.

Authors:  Claudia C Sidler-Maier; James P Waddell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Patient factors predict periprosthetic fractures after revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Matthew R Jensen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert Pivec; Aaron J Johnson; Simon C Mears; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Periprosthetic fractures around a cementless hydroxyapatite-coated implant: a new fracture pattern is described.

Authors:  William N Capello; James A D'Antonio; Marybeth Naughton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Young age and wedge stem design are risk factors for periprosthetic fracture after arthroplasty due to hip fracture. A case-control study.

Authors:  Roope Sarvilinna; Heini Huhtala; Jorma Pajamäki
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 7.  Intraoperative fractures of the femur in prosthetic hip reimplantations.

Authors:  S Terzi; A Toni; M C Zanotlí Russo; D Nardi; A Sudanese; A Giunti
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  1997 Jul-Sep

8.  Impaction bone grafting in revision hip surgery. A high incidence of complications.

Authors:  J Pekkarinen; A Alho; J Lepistö; M Ylikoski; P Ylinen; T Paavilainen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-01

9.  The excess mortality due to periprosthetic femur fracture. A study from the Swedish national hip arthroplasty register.

Authors:  H Lindahl; A Oden; G Garellick; H Malchau
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Early complications after one hundred and forty-four consecutive hip revisions with impacted morselized allograft bone and cement.

Authors:  Ewald Ornstein; Isam Atroshi; Herbert Franzén; Ragnar Johnsson; Per Sandquist; Martin Sundberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  5 in total

1.  Higher prevalence of periprosthetic fractures with ceramic on polyethylene hip bearing compared with ceramic on ceramic on the contralateral side: a forty year experience with hip osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Jean Charles Auregan; Claire Bastard; Victor Housset; Charles Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette; Arnaud Dubory
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-04       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Occult periprosthetic femoral fractures occur frequently during a long, trapezoidal, double-tapered cementless femoral stem fixation in primary THA.

Authors:  Ho Hyun Yun; Jung Taek Lim; Se-Hyun Yang; Phil Sun Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Factors affecting the incidence of postoperative periprosthetic fractures following primary and revision hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christos Bissias; Angelos Kaspiris; Athanasios Kalogeropoulos; Konstantinos Papoutsis; Nikolaos Natsioulas; Konstantinos Barbagiannis; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos; Olga D Savvidou
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Incidence and risk factors of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures during primary total hip arthroplasty: 218,423 cases reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register between 1987 and 2020.

Authors:  Heinrich Brüggemann; Ingvild Dalen; Lena Kristin Bache-Mathiesen; Anne Marie Fenstad; Geir Hallan; Lars Fosse
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Comparison of Bone Remodeling Between Collum Femoris-Preserving Stems and Ribbed Stems in 1-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Zeming Liu; Bo Liu; Sikai Liu; Mengnan Li; Xiao Chen; Yongtai Han
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-05-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.