Literature DB >> 22333915

DNA replication stress differentially regulates G1/S genes via Rad53-dependent inactivation of Nrm1.

Anna Travesa1, Dwight Kuo, Robertus A M de Bruin, Tatyana I Kalashnikova, Marisela Guaderrama, Kevin Thai, Aaron Aslanian, Marcus B Smolka, John R Yates, Trey Ideker, Curt Wittenberg.   

Abstract

MBF and SBF transcription factors regulate a large family of coordinately expressed G1/S genes required for early cell-cycle functions including DNA replication and repair. SBF is inactivated upon S-phase entry by Clb/CDK whereas MBF targets are repressed by the co-repressor, Nrm1. Using genome-wide expression analysis of cells treated with methyl methane sulfonate (MMS), hydroxyurea (HU) or camptothecin (CPT), we show that genotoxic stress during S phase specifically induces MBF-regulated genes. This occurs via direct phosphorylation of Nrm1 by Rad53, the effector checkpoint kinase, which prevents its binding to MBF target promoters. We conclude that MBF-regulated genes are distinguished from SBF-regulated genes by their sensitivity to activation by the S-phase checkpoint, thereby, providing an effective mechanism for enhancing DNA replication and repair and promoting genome stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22333915      PMCID: PMC3321207          DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2012.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  40 in total

Review 1.  The hallmarks of cancer.

Authors:  D Hanahan; R A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-01-07       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Genomic binding sites of the yeast cell-cycle transcription factors SBF and MBF.

Authors:  V R Iyer; C E Horak; C S Scafe; D Botstein; M Snyder; P O Brown
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint.

Authors:  Tony S Byun; Marcin Pacek; Muh-ching Yee; Johannes C Walter; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  High functional overlap between MluI cell-cycle box binding factor and Swi4/6 cell-cycle box binding factor in the G1/S transcriptional program in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  James M Bean; Eric D Siggia; Frederick R Cross
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Cell death induced by topoisomerase-targeted drugs: more questions than answers.

Authors:  S H Kaufmann
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1998-10-01

6.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes.

Authors:  A P Gasch; P T Spellman; C M Kao; O Carmel-Harel; M B Eisen; G Storz; D Botstein; P O Brown
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 7.  Cell cycle-dependent transcription in yeast: promoters, transcription factors, and transcriptomes.

Authors:  Curt Wittenberg; Steven I Reed
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-04-18       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms.

Authors:  Y Sanchez; J Bachant; H Wang; F Hu; D Liu; M Tetzlaff; S J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-11-05       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint.

Authors:  J A Tercero; J F Diffley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization.

Authors:  P T Spellman; G Sherlock; M Q Zhang; V R Iyer; K Anders; M B Eisen; P O Brown; D Botstein; B Futcher
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.138

View more
  47 in total

1.  Cdk1-interacting protein Cip1 is regulated by the S phase checkpoint in response to genotoxic stress.

Authors:  Ze Zhang; Ping Ren; Ajay A Vashisht; James A Wohlschlegel; David G Quintana; Fanli Zeng
Journal:  Genes Cells       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Topology and control of the cell-cycle-regulated transcriptional circuitry.

Authors:  Steven B Haase; Curt Wittenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The checkpoint transcriptional response: make sure to turn it off once you are satisfied.

Authors:  Marcus B Smolka; Francisco M Bastos de Oliveira; Michael R Harris; Robertus A M de Bruin
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 4.  Transcriptional responses to DNA damage.

Authors:  Erica Silva; Trey Ideker
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-05-07

5.  Dampening DNA damage checkpoint signalling via coordinated BRCT domain interactions.

Authors:  José R Cussiol; Carolyn M Jablonowski; Askar Yimit; Grant W Brown; Marcus B Smolka
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 6.  Genetic instability in budding and fission yeast-sources and mechanisms.

Authors:  Adrianna Skoneczna; Aneta Kaniak; Marek Skoneczny
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 16.408

7.  The Late S-Phase Transcription Factor Hcm1 Is Regulated through Phosphorylation by the Cell Wall Integrity Checkpoint.

Authors:  Takahiro Negishi; Jiri Veis; David Hollenstein; Mizuho Sekiya; Gustav Ammerer; Yoshikazu Ohya
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Rad53 downregulates mitotic gene transcription by inhibiting the transcriptional activator Ndd1.

Authors:  Ellen R Edenberg; Ajay Vashisht; Jennifer A Benanti; James Wohlschlegel; David P Toczyski
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  G(1)/S and G(2)/M cyclin-dependent kinase activities commit cells to death in the absence of the S-phase checkpoint.

Authors:  Nicola Manfrini; Elisa Gobbini; Veronica Baldo; Camilla Trovesi; Giovanna Lucchini; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Phenotypic Consequences of a Spontaneous Loss of Heterozygosity in a Common Laboratory Strain of Candida albicans.

Authors:  Toni Ciudad; Meleah Hickman; Alberto Bellido; Judith Berman; Germán Larriba
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.