Literature DB >> 23292635

Dynamics of the DNA damage response: insights from live-cell imaging.

Ketki Karanam1, Alexander Loewer, Galit Lahav.   

Abstract

All organisms have to safeguard the integrity of their genome to prevent malfunctioning and oncogenic transformation. Sophisticated DNA damage response mechanisms have evolved to detect and repair genomic lesions. With the emergence of live-cell microscopy of individual cells, we now begin to appreciate the complex spatiotemporal kinetics of the DNA damage response and can address the causes and consequences of the heterogeneity in the responses of genetically identical cells. Here, we highlight key discoveries where live-cell imaging has provided unprecedented insights into how cells respond to DNA double-strand breaks and discuss the main challenges and promises in using this technique.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23292635      PMCID: PMC3609438          DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/els059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics        ISSN: 2041-2649            Impact factor:   4.241


  67 in total

1.  Dynamics of DNA double-strand breaks revealed by clustering of damaged chromosome domains.

Authors:  Jacob A Aten; Jan Stap; Przemek M Krawczyk; Carel H van Oven; Ron A Hoebe; Jeroen Essers; Roland Kanaar
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-01-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer.

Authors:  Michael B Kastan; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Chromatin mobility is increased at sites of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  P M Krawczyk; T Borovski; J Stap; T Cijsouw; R ten Cate; J P Medema; R Kanaar; N A P Franken; J A Aten
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Dynamic proteomics in individual human cells uncovers widespread cell-cycle dependence of nuclear proteins.

Authors:  Alex Sigal; Ron Milo; Ariel Cohen; Naama Geva-Zatorsky; Yael Klein; Inbal Alaluf; Naamah Swerdlin; Natalie Perzov; Tamar Danon; Yuvalal Liron; Tal Raveh; Anne E Carpenter; Galit Lahav; Uri Alon
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 5.  Molecular mechanisms of mammalian global genome nucleotide excision repair.

Authors:  Ludovic C J Gillet; Orlando D Schärer
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Evi Soutoglou; Jonas F Dorn; Kundan Sengupta; Maria Jasin; Andre Nussenzweig; Thomas Ried; Gaudenz Danuser; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 28.824

7.  In vivo determination of the fractional kill of human tumor cells by chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  M C Berenbaum
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1972-10

8.  Increased chromosome mobility facilitates homology search during recombination.

Authors:  Judith Miné-Hattab; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2012-04-08       Impact factor: 28.824

9.  Modularly assembled designer TAL effector nucleases for targeted gene knockout and gene replacement in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Ting Li; Sheng Huang; Xuefeng Zhao; David A Wright; Susan Carpenter; Martin H Spalding; Donald P Weeks; Bing Yang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Mammalian expression of infrared fluorescent proteins engineered from a bacterial phytochrome.

Authors:  Xiaokun Shu; Antoine Royant; Michael Z Lin; Todd A Aguilera; Varda Lev-Ram; Paul A Steinbach; Roger Y Tsien
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  9 in total

1.  Chromatin dynamics during DNA repair revealed by pair correlation analysis of molecular flow in the nucleus.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hinde; Xiangduo Kong; Kyoko Yokomori; Enrico Gratton
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Quantitating repair protein accumulation at DNA lesions: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Jyothi Mahadevan; Samuel Bowerman; Karolin Luger
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-07-08

3.  Bridging the gap between in vitro and in vivo: Dose and schedule predictions for the ATR inhibitor AZD6738.

Authors:  Stephen Checkley; Linda MacCallum; James Yates; Paul Jasper; Haobin Luo; John Tolsma; Claus Bendtsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  How are base excision DNA repair pathways deployed in vivo?

Authors:  Upasna Thapar; Bruce Demple
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-03-16

5.  Excitability in the p53 network mediates robust signaling with tunable activation thresholds in single cells.

Authors:  Gregor Mönke; Elena Cristiano; Ana Finzel; Dhana Friedrich; Hanspeter Herzel; Martin Falcke; Alexander Loewer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Multimodal Light Microscopy Approaches to Reveal Structural and Functional Properties of Promyelocytic Leukemia Nuclear Bodies.

Authors:  Christian Hoischen; Shamci Monajembashi; Klaus Weisshart; Peter Hemmerich
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Learning unsupervised feature representations for single cell microscopy images with paired cell inpainting.

Authors:  Alex X Lu; Oren Z Kraus; Sam Cooper; Alan M Moses
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 8.  In Situ Analysis of DNA-Protein Complex Formation upon Radiation-Induced DNA Damage.

Authors:  Giulio Ticli; Ennio Prosperi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Studying the organization of DNA repair by single-cell and single-molecule imaging.

Authors:  Stephan Uphoff; Achillefs N Kapanidis
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-03-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.