Literature DB >> 2232760

Genetic implications of gender differences in the prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

R C Bilger1, M L Matthies, D R Hammel, M E Demorest.   

Abstract

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs), which occur in about 40% of normal-hearing humans, do not have a firm explanation in auditory theory nor are their distributional properties well understood. To enhance our understanding of SOAEs, we have pooled data from three reports (Hammel, 1983; Strickland, Burns, & Tubis, 1985; Zurek, 1981) to assemble a large enough sample to assess the relevant hypotheses about the effects of ear and gender on their presence. The results, based on loglinear analyses of the pooled sample of 131 normal-hearing subjects, indicated that (a) the prevalence of SOAEs for female subjects [P(S/F) = .533] was significantly higher than that for male subjects [P(S/M) = .268]; (b) the percentage of right ears with SOAEs (36.6%) was significantly greater than that of left ears (25.2%); and (c) right and left ears were not independent with respect to the presence of SOAEs. These results can be explained by assuming that the (a) tendency to exhibit emissions is inherited, perhaps as a sex-linked trait and (b) ears are asymmetric with respect to the anatomical anomalies of the apical portion of the organ of Corti that may precipitate SOAEs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2232760     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3303.418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  26 in total

1.  Cochlear Reflectance and Otoacoustic Emission Predictions of Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Sara E Fultz; Judy G Kopun; Natalie M Lenzen; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: frequency modulation.

Authors:  Lin Bian
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Ear effect and gender difference of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in children with auditory processing disorder.

Authors:  Kimberly Z Wissler; Kyoko Nagao; L A Greenwood; Rebecca G Gaffney; R M Cardinale; Thierry Morlet
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2014-07-18

Review 4.  Sexual orientation and the auditory system.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 8.606

5.  Laterality of basic auditory perception.

Authors:  Yvonne S Sininger; Anjali Bhatara
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2011-07-07

6.  Sex differences in distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions Reveal an Efficient Auditory Efferent Network.

Authors:  Viorica Marian; Tuan Q Lam; Sayuri Hayakawa; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 8.  Otoacoustic emissions: a new method to diagnose hearing impairment in children.

Authors:  P G Zorowka
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.183

9.  Ear asymmetries in middle-ear, cochlear, and brainstem responses in human infants.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Michael P Gorga; Walt Jesteadt; Lynette M Smith
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Masculinization of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.