Literature DB >> 22305772

Listener effort for highly intelligible tracheoesophageal speech.

Kathy F Nagle1, Tanya L Eadie.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to determine whether: (a) inexperienced listeners can reliably judge listener effort and (b) whether listener effort provides unique information beyond speech intelligibility or acceptability in tracheoesophageal speech. Twenty inexperienced listeners made judgments of speech acceptability and amount of effort required to listen to 14 male tracheoesophageal speakers using a paired comparison paradigm. Intelligibility was controlled to limit the analysis to the relationship between ratings of listener effort and speech acceptability. Results showed that as a group, inexperienced listeners reliably rated both speech acceptability and listener effort. In addition, ratings of speech acceptability and listener effort were strongly correlated (r>.99); however, there was evidence that some individual listeners assigned different ratings for each dimension for the same speech samples. Results have important implications for communication success for tracheoesophageal speakers. LEARNING OUTCOMES: Readers will be able to describe: (a) the measurement of listener burden in speech and (b) the differences and relationships among listener effort, speech acceptability and speech intelligibility.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22305772      PMCID: PMC3334414          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Commun Disord        ISSN: 0021-9924            Impact factor:   2.288


  40 in total

1.  Assessing the cognitive demands of speech listening for people with hearing losses.

Authors:  B Rakerd; P F Seitz; M Whearty
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Individual differences in voice quality perception.

Authors:  J Kreiman; B R Gerratt; K Precoda; G S Berke
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-06

3.  The perceptual structure of pathologic voice quality.

Authors:  J Kreiman; B R Gerratt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Listener experience and perception of voice quality.

Authors:  J Kreiman; B R Gerratt; K Precoda
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1990-03

5.  Acoustic characteristics of female tracheoesophageal speech.

Authors:  M D Trudeau; Y Y Qi
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1990-05

6.  A comparison of the speech acceptability of good and excellent esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers.

Authors:  M D Trudeau
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 7.  Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research.

Authors:  J Kreiman; B R Gerratt; G B Kempster; A Erman; G S Berke
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-02

8.  Comparing internal and external standards in voice quality judgments.

Authors:  B R Gerratt; J Kreiman; N Antonanzas-Barroso; G S Berke
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-02

9.  A comparative acoustic study of normal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech production.

Authors:  J Robbins; H B Fisher; E C Blom; M I Singer
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1984-05

10.  Acceptability ratings of tracheoesophageal speech.

Authors:  R H Pindzola; B H Cain
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  6 in total

1.  Continuous Vocal Fry Simulated in Laboratory Subjects: A Preliminary Report on Voice Production and Listener Ratings.

Authors:  Anumitha Venkatraman; M Preeti Sivasankar
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  The Effect of Noise on Relationships Between Speech Intelligibility and Self-Reported Communication Measures in Tracheoesophageal Speakers.

Authors:  Tanya L Eadie; Devon Sawin Otero; Susan Bolt; Mara Kapsner-Smith; Jessica R Sullivan
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Listener Perception of Monopitch, Naturalness, and Intelligibility for Speakers With Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Supraja Anand; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  "You Say Severe, I Say Mild": Toward an Empirical Classification of Dysarthria Severity.

Authors:  Kaila L Stipancic; Kira M Palmer; Hannah P Rowe; Yana Yunusova; James D Berry; Jordan R Green
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 2.674

5.  Auditory-perceptual speech outcomes and quality of life after total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Tanya L Eadie; Adam M B Day; Devon E Sawin; Kristin Lamvik; Philip C Doyle
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Effect of Noise on Speech Intelligibility and Perceived Listening Effort in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Tanya L Eadie; Holly Durr; Cara Sauder; Kathleen Nagle; Mara Kapsner-Smith; Kristie A Spencer
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.408

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.