Literature DB >> 2314068

Listener experience and perception of voice quality.

J Kreiman1, B R Gerratt, K Precoda.   

Abstract

Five speech-language clinicians and 5 naive listeners rated the similarity of pairs of normal and dysphonic voices. Multidimensional scaling was used to determine the voice characteristics that were perceptually important for each voice set and listener group. Solution spaces were compared to determine if clinical experience affects perceptual strategies. Naive and expert listeners attended to different aspects of voice quality when judging the similarity of voices, for both normal and pathological voices. All naive listeners used similar perceptual strategies; however, individual clinicians differed substantially in the parameters they considered important when judging similarity. These differences were large enough to suggest that care must be taken when using data averaged across clinicians, because averaging obscures important aspects of an individual's perceptual behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2314068     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3301.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  10 in total

1.  Listener effort for highly intelligible tracheoesophageal speech.

Authors:  Kathy F Nagle; Tanya L Eadie
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  [On the auditory evaluation of voice quality].

Authors:  M Ptok; C Schwemmle; C Iven; M Jessen; T Nawka
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  A Comparative Study of Auditory-Perceptual Speech Measures for the Early Detection of Mild Speech Impairments.

Authors:  Mili Kuruvilla-Dugdale; Katie Threlkeld; Mary Salazar; Gwen Nolan; Lindsey Heidrick
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 1.761

4.  Acoustic and linguistic factors affecting perceptual dissimilarity judgments of voices.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Kristina T Furbeck; Emily J Thurston
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The Americleft Speech Project: A Training and Reliability Study.

Authors:  Kathy L Chapman; Adriane Baylis; Judith Trost-Cardamone; Kelly Nett Cordero; Angela Dixon; Cindy Dobbelsteyn; Anna Thurmes; Kristina Wilson; Anne Harding-Bell; Triona Sweeney; Gregory Stoddard; Debbie Sell
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2014-12-22

6.  Comparing two methods for reducing variability in voice quality measurements.

Authors:  Jody Kreiman; Bruce R Gerratt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Nonlinear dynamic-based analysis of severe dysphonia in patients with vocal fold scar and sulcus vocalis.

Authors:  Seong Hee Choi; Yu Zhang; Jack J Jiang; Diane M Bless; Nathan V Welham
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  The effect of anchors on reliability of endoscopic tremor ratings.

Authors:  Soren Y Lowell; Richard T Kelley; Lauren Busekroos; Ramani Voleti; Carly J Hosbach-Cannon; Raymond H Colton; Dragos Mihaila
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Decoding phonation with artificial intelligence (DeP AI): Proof of concept.

Authors:  Maria E Powell; Marcelino Rodriguez Cancio; David Young; William Nock; Beshoy Abdelmessih; Amy Zeller; Irvin Perez Morales; Peng Zhang; C Gaelyn Garrett; Douglas Schmidt; Jules White; Alexander Gelbard
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-25

10.  The Impact of Parkinson's Disease on Breath Pauses and Their Relationship to Speech Impairment: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Meghan Darling-White; Jessica E Huber
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 2.408

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.