Literature DB >> 33630664

Effect of Noise on Speech Intelligibility and Perceived Listening Effort in Head and Neck Cancer.

Tanya L Eadie1, Holly Durr1, Cara Sauder1, Kathleen Nagle2, Mara Kapsner-Smith1, Kristie A Spencer1.   

Abstract

Purpose This study (a) examined the effect of different levels of background noise on speech intelligibility and perceived listening effort in speakers with impaired and intact speech following treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) and (b) determined the relative contribution of speech intelligibility, speaker group, and background noise to a measure of perceived listening effort. Method Ten speakers diagnosed with nasal, oral, or oropharyngeal HNC provided audio recordings of six sentences from the Sentence Intelligibility Test. All speakers were 100% intelligible in quiet: Five speakers with HNC exhibited mild speech imprecisions (speech impairment group), and five speakers with HNC demonstrated intact speech (HNC control group). Speech recordings were presented to 30 inexperienced listeners, who transcribed the sentences and rated perceived listening effort in quiet and two levels (+7 and +5 dB SNR) of background noise. Results Significant Group × Noise interactions were found for speech intelligibility and perceived listening effort. While no differences in speech intelligibility were found between the speaker groups in quiet, the results showed that, as the signal-to-noise ratio decreased, speakers with intact speech (HNC control) performed significantly better (greater intelligibility, less perceived listening effort) than those with speech imprecisions in the two noise conditions. Perceived listening effort was also shown to be associated with decreased speech intelligibility, imprecise speech, and increased background noise. Conclusions Speakers with HNC who are 100% intelligible in quiet but who exhibit some degree of imprecise speech are particularly vulnerable to the effects of increased background noise in comparison to those with intact speech. Results have implications for speech evaluations, counseling, and rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33630664      PMCID: PMC8702834          DOI: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1058-0360            Impact factor:   2.408


  38 in total

1.  A qualitative study of interference with communicative participation across communication disorders in adults.

Authors:  Carolyn Baylor; Michael Burns; Tanya Eadie; Deanna Britton; Kathryn Yorkston
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 2.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Word recognition performance in various background competitors.

Authors:  J L Sperry; T L Wiley; M R Chial
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Sophia E Kramer; Mark A Eckert; Brent Edwards; Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Larry E Humes; Ulrike Lemke; Thomas Lunner; Mohan Matthen; Carol L Mackersie; Graham Naylor; Natalie A Phillips; Michael Richter; Mary Rudner; Mitchell S Sommers; Kelly L Tremblay; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  A comparison of the intelligibility of esophageal, electrolaryngeal, and normal speech in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  S C Holley; J Lerman; K Randolph
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 6.  Perceptual learning of dysarthric speech: a review of experimental studies.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Megan J McAuliffe; Julie M Liss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Speech intelligibility after glossectomy and speech rehabilitation.

Authors:  C L Furia; L P Kowalski; M R Latorre; E C Angelis; N M Martins; A P Barros; K C Ribeiro
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-07

8.  Listener ratings of the intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech in noise.

Authors:  D McColl; D Fucci; L Petrosino; D E Martin; P McCaffrey
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  Effects of presentation mode and repeated familiarization on intelligibility of dysarthric speech.

Authors:  Katherine C Hustad; Meghan A Cahill
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  Association between objective measurement of the speech intelligibility of young people with dysarthria and listener ratings of ease of understanding.

Authors:  Sophie Landa; Lindsay Pennington; Nick Miller; Sheila Robson; Vicki Thompson; Nick Steen
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.484

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.