Literature DB >> 6716991

A comparative acoustic study of normal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech production.

J Robbins, H B Fisher, E C Blom, M I Singer.   

Abstract

Acoustic characteristics of two types of alaryngeal speech were quantified and compared to normal speech production. High-quality audio recordings were obtained from 15 subjects who had undergone the tracheoesophageal puncture method of postlaryngectomy vocal rehabilitation (Singer & Blom, 1980), 15 esophageal speakers, and 15 laryngeal talkers as they sustained the vowel /alpha/ and read a standard paragraph. Ten frequency, 7 intensity, and 13 duration variables were quantified. Central tendency and variability measures of frequency and duration for the three speaker groups indicated that tracheoesophageal speech is more similar to normal speech than is esophageal speech. Intensity measures indicated that tracheoesophageal speech is more intense than normal and esophageal speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6716991     DOI: 10.1044/jshd.4902.202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord        ISSN: 0022-4677


  18 in total

1.  Application of the Voice Handicap Index in 45 patients with substitution voicing after total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Mieke Moerman; Jean-Pierre Martens; Philippe Dejonckere
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Listener effort for highly intelligible tracheoesophageal speech.

Authors:  Kathy F Nagle; Tanya L Eadie
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Intelligibility of laryngectomees' substitute speech: automatic speech recognition and subjective rating.

Authors:  Maria Schuster; Tino Haderlein; Elmar Nöth; Jörg Lohscheller; Ulrich Eysholdt; Frank Rosanowski
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Perceptual evaluation of substitution voices: development and evaluation of the (I)INFVo rating scale.

Authors:  M B J Moerman; J P Martens; M J Van der Borgt; M Peleman; M Gillis; P H Dejonckere
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-25       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  The INFVo perceptual rating scale for substitution voicing: development and reliability.

Authors:  Mieke Moerman; Jean-Pierre Martens; Lise Crevier-Buchman; Else de Haan; Stephanie Grand; Christophe Tessier; Virginie Woisard; Philippe Dejonckere
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Intensity and fundamental frequency control in tracheoesophageal voice.

Authors:  A Schindler; A Canale; A L Cavalot; R Albera; P Capaccio; F Ottaviani; O Schindler
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Laryngeal Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery.

Authors:  Soon-Hyun Ahn; Hyun Jun Hong; Soon Young Kwon; Kee Hwan Kwon; Jong-Lyel Roh; Junsun Ryu; Jun Hee Park; Seung-Kuk Baek; Guk Haeng Lee; Sei Young Lee; Jin Choon Lee; Man Ki Chung; Young Hoon Joo; Yong Bae Ji; Jeong Hun Hah; Minsu Kwon; Young Min Park; Chang Myeon Song; Sung-Chan Shin; Chang Hwan Ryu; Doh Young Lee; Young Chan Lee; Jae Won Chang; Ha Min Jeong; Jae-Keun Cho; Wonjae Cha; Byung Joon Chun; Ik Joon Choi; Hyo Geun Choi; Kang Dae Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.372

8.  Automatic evaluation of prosodic features of tracheoesophageal substitute voice.

Authors:  Tino Haderlein; Elmar Nöth; Hikmet Toy; Anton Batliner; Maria Schuster; Ulrich Eysholdt; Joachim Hornegger; Frank Rosanowski
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Tracheoesophageal Puncture - an Indian perspective.

Authors:  R Dhawan; A Gulati; A K Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-10

10.  [Automated postlaryngectomy telephone test].

Authors:  T Haderlein; K Riedhammer; A Maier; E Nöth; U Eysholdt; F Rosanowski
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.