Literature DB >> 15203002

Motion-sensitive neurones in V5/MT modulate perceived spatial position.

Paul V McGraw1, Vincent Walsh, Brendan T Barrett.   

Abstract

Until recently, it was widely believed that object position and object motion were represented independently in the visual cortex. However, several studies have shown that adaptation to motion produces substantial shifts in the perceived position of subsequently viewed stationary objects. Two stages of motion adaptation have been proposed: an initial stage at the level of V1 and a secondary stage thought to be located in V5/MT. Indeed, selective adaptation can be demonstrated at each of these levels of motion analysis. What remains unknown is which of these cortical sites are involved in modulating the positional representation of subsequently viewed objects. To answer this question directly, we disrupted cortical activity by using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) immediately after motion adaptation. When TMS was delivered to V5/MT after motion adaptation, the perceived offset of the test stimulus was greatly reduced. In marked contrast, TMS of V1 had no effect on the changes that normally occur in perceived position after motion adaptation. This result demonstrates that the anatomical locus at which motion and positional information interact is area V5/MT rather than V1/V2.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15203002     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  18 in total

1.  The perceived position of moving objects: transcranial magnetic stimulation of area MT+ reduces the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Jamie Ward; Romi Nijhawan; David Whitney
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Spatially asymmetric response to moving patterns in the visual cortex: re-examining the local sign hypothesis.

Authors:  David Whitney; David W Bressler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The segregation and integration of colour in motion processing revealed by motion after-effects.

Authors:  D J McKeefry; E G Laviers; P V McGraw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Visually guided reaching depends on motion area MT+.

Authors:  David Whitney; Amanda Ellison; Nichola J Rice; Derek Arnold; Melvyn Goodale; Vincent Walsh; David Milner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  The movement of motion-defined contours can bias perceived position.

Authors:  Szonya Durant; Johannes M Zanker
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Motion-form interactions beyond the motion integration level: evidence for interactions between orientation and optic flow signals.

Authors:  Andrea Pavan; Rosilari Bellacosa Marotti; George Mather
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Crowding is tuned for perceived (not physical) location.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; John A Greenwood; Thomas A Carlson; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Unifying account of visual motion and position perception.

Authors:  Oh-Sang Kwon; Duje Tadin; David C Knill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The edge of awareness: Mask spatial density, but not color, determines optimal temporal frequency for continuous flash suppression.

Authors:  Jan Drewes; Weina Zhu; David Melcher
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Psychophysical and rTMS Evidence for the Presence of Motion Opponency in Human V5.

Authors:  Benjamin Thompson; Choi Deblieck; Allan Wu; Marco Iacoboni; Zili Liu
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.