Literature DB >> 22299722

Organizational characteristics of high- and low-performing anticoagulation clinics in the Veterans Health Administration.

Adam J Rose1, Beth Ann Petrakis, Patricia Callahan, Scott Mambourg, Dimple Patel, Elaine M Hylek, Barbara G Bokhour.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Anticoagulation clinics (ACCs) can improve anticoagulation control and prevent adverse events. However, ACCs vary widely in their performance on anticoagulation control. Our objective was to compare the organization and management of top-performing with that of bottom-performing ACCs. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Three high outlier and three low outlier ACCs in the Veterans Health Administration (VA). STUDY
DESIGN: Site visits with qualitative data collection and analysis. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with ACC staff regarding work flow, staffing, organization, and quality assurance efforts. We also observed ACC operations and collected documents, such as the clinic protocol. We used grounded thematic analysis to examine site-level factors associated with high and low outlier status. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: High outlier sites were characterized by (1) adequate (pharmacist) staffing and effective use of (nonpharmacist) support personnel; (2) innovation to standardize clinical practice around evidence-based guidelines; (3) the presence of a quality champion for the ACC; (4) higher staff qualifications; (5) a climate of ongoing group learning; and (6) internal efforts to measure performance. Although high outliers had all of these features, no low outlier had more than two of them.
CONCLUSIONS: The top-performing ACCs in the VA system shared six relatively recognizable characteristics. Efforts to improve performance should focus on these domains. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22299722      PMCID: PMC3401398          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01377.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  14 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them?

Authors:  S Sofaer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Risk-adjusted percent time in therapeutic range as a quality indicator for outpatient oral anticoagulation: results of the Veterans Affairs Study to Improve Anticoagulation (VARIA).

Authors:  Adam J Rose; Elaine M Hylek; Al Ozonoff; Arlene S Ash; Joel I Reisman; Dan R Berlowitz
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2010-11-23

Review 3.  Measuring quality of oral anticoagulation care: extending quality measurement to a new field.

Authors:  Adam J Rose; Dan R Berlowitz; Susan M Frayne; Elaine M Hylek
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2009-03

Review 4.  Effect of study setting on anticoagulation control: a systematic review and metaregression.

Authors:  Carl van Walraven; Alison Jennings; Natalie Oake; Dean Fergusson; Alan J Forster
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Patient characteristics associated with oral anticoagulation control: results of the Veterans AffaiRs Study to Improve Anticoagulation (VARIA).

Authors:  A J Rose; E M Hylek; A Ozonoff; A S Ash; J I Reisman; D R Berlowitz
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.824

6.  What distinguishes top-performing hospitals in acute myocardial infarction mortality rates? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Leslie A Curry; Erica Spatz; Emily Cherlin; Jennifer W Thompson; David Berg; Henry H Ting; Carole Decker; Harlan M Krumholz; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin at different levels of international normalised ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the RE-LY trial.

Authors:  Lars Wallentin; Salim Yusuf; Michael D Ezekowitz; Marco Alings; Marcus Flather; Maria Grazia Franzosi; Prem Pais; Antonio Dans; John Eikelboom; Jonas Oldgren; Janice Pogue; Paul A Reilly; Sean Yang; Stuart J Connolly
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition).

Authors:  Jack Ansell; Jack Hirsh; Elaine Hylek; Alan Jacobson; Mark Crowther; Gualtiero Palareti
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  F R Rosendaal; S C Cannegieter; F J van der Meer; E Briët
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 5.249

10.  Delivery of optimized anticoagulant therapy: consensus statement from the Anticoagulation Forum.

Authors:  David A Garcia; Daniel M Witt; Elaine Hylek; Ann K Wittkowsky; Edith A Nutescu; Alan Jacobson; Stephan Moll; Geno J Merli; Mark Crowther; Laura Earl; Richard C Becker; Lynn Oertel; Amir Jaffer; Jack E Ansell
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  A Practical Guide to Using the Positive Deviance Method in Health Services Research.

Authors:  Adam J Rose; Megan B McCullough
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Positive Deviance to Address Health Equity in Quality and Safety in Obstetrics.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Howell; Zainab N Ahmed; Shoshanna Sofaer; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.190

3.  Consistent differences in medical unit fall rates: implications for research and practice.

Authors:  Vincent S Staggs; Lorraine C Mion; Ronald I Shorr
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Barriers and Facilitators to Evidence-Based Practices for Obesity Prevention in Head Start.

Authors:  Taren Swindle; Susan L Johnson; Karen Davenport; Leanne Whiteside-Mansell; Thirosha Thirunavukarasu; Gireesh Sadasavin; Geoffrey M Curran
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.045

5.  Determinants of Risk-Aligned Bladder Cancer Surveillance-Mixed-Methods Evaluation Using the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases Framework.

Authors:  Florian R Schroeck; A Aziz Ould Ismail; Grace N Perry; David A Haggstrom; Steven L Sanchez; DeRon R Walker; Jeanette Young; Susan Zickmund; Lisa Zubkoff
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-08-31

6.  Facility-level changes in receipt of pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorder: Implications for implementation science.

Authors:  Andrea K Finlay; Ingrid A Binswanger; Christine Timko; David Smelson; Matthew A Stimmel; Mengfei Yu; Tom Bowe; Alex H S Harris
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2018-10-02

7.  Gaps in monitoring during oral anticoagulation: insights into care transitions, monitoring barriers, and medication nonadherence.

Authors:  Adam J Rose; Donald R Miller; Al Ozonoff; Dan R Berlowitz; Arlene S Ash; Shibei Zhao; Joel I Reisman; Elaine M Hylek
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 8.  High performing hospitals: a qualitative systematic review of associated factors and practical strategies for improvement.

Authors:  Natalie Taylor; Robyn Clay-Williams; Emily Hogden; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Oliver Groene
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Hospital Workforce Engagement and Inpatient Mortality Rate: Findings from the English National Health Service Staff Surveys.

Authors:  R G Badgett; L Jonker; S Xirasagar
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  What methods are used to apply positive deviance within healthcare organisations? A systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Baxter; Natalie Taylor; Ian Kellar; Rebecca Lawton
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 7.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.