Literature DB >> 18574265

Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition).

Jack Ansell1, Jack Hirsh2, Elaine Hylek3, Alan Jacobson4, Mark Crowther5, Gualtiero Palareti6.   

Abstract

This article concerning the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) is part of the American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). It describes the antithrombotic effect of the VKAs, the monitoring of anticoagulation intensity, and the clinical applications of VKA therapy and provides specific management recommendations. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do or do not outweigh the risks, burdens, and costs. Grade 2 recommendations suggest that the individual patient's values may lead to different choices. (For a full understanding of the grading, see the "Grades of Recommendation" chapter by Guyatt et al, CHEST 2008; 133:123S-131S.) Among the key recommendations in this article are the following: for dosing of VKAs, we recommend the initiation of oral anticoagulation therapy, with doses between 5 mg and 10 mg for the first 1 or 2 days for most individuals, with subsequent dosing based on the international normalized ratio (INR) response (Grade 1B); we suggest against pharmacogenetic-based dosing until randomized data indicate that it is beneficial (Grade 2C); and in elderly and other patient subgroups who are debilitated or malnourished, we recommend a starting dose of < or = 5 mg (Grade 1C). The article also includes several specific recommendations for the management of patients with nontherapeutic INRs, with INRs above the therapeutic range, and with bleeding whether the INR is therapeutic or elevated. For the use of vitamin K to reverse a mildly elevated INR, we recommend oral rather than subcutaneous administration (Grade 1A). For patients with life-threatening bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage, we recommend the use of prothrombin complex concentrates or recombinant factor VIIa to immediately reverse the INR (Grade 1C). For most patients who have a lupus inhibitor, we recommend a therapeutic target INR of 2.5 (range, 2.0 to 3.0) [Grade 1A]. We recommend that physicians who manage oral anticoagulation therapy do so in a systematic and coordinated fashion, incorporating patient education, systematic INR testing, tracking, follow-up, and good patient communication of results and dose adjustments [Grade 1B]. In patients who are suitably selected and trained, patient self-testing or patient self-management of dosing are effective alternative treatment models that result in improved quality of anticoagulation management, with greater time in the therapeutic range and fewer adverse events. Patient self-monitoring or self-management, however, is a choice made by patients and physicians that depends on many factors. We suggest that such therapeutic management be implemented where suitable (Grade 2B).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18574265     DOI: 10.1378/chest.08-0670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  509 in total

1.  [Anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation : the future has begun].

Authors:  M Moser; C Bode
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Genetic warfarin dosing: tables versus algorithms.

Authors:  Brian S Finkelman; Brian F Gage; Julie A Johnson; Colleen M Brensinger; Stephen E Kimmel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Practical issues with vitamin K antagonists: elevated INRs, low time-in-therapeutic range, and warfarin failure.

Authors:  Andrea Lee; Mark Crowther
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Factor VII R353Q genetic polymorphism is associated with altered warfarin sensitivity among CYP2C9 *1/*1 carriers.

Authors:  Liat Mlynarsky; Idit Bejarano-Achache; Mordechai Muszkat; Yoseph Caraco
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Incidence, clinical impact and risk of bleeding during oral anticoagulation therapy.

Authors:  Andrea Rubboli; Cecilia Becattini; Freek Wa Verheugt
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-26

6.  VKORC1-1639A allele influences warfarin maintenance dosage among Blacks receiving warfarin anticoagulation: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Fatima Donia Mili; Tenecia Allen; Paula Weinstein Wadell; W Craig Hooper; Christine De Staercke; Christopher J Bean; Cathy Lally; Harland Austin; Nanette K Wenger
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-08

7.  Language, literacy, and characterization of stroke among patients taking warfarin for stroke prevention: Implications for health communication.

Authors:  Margaret C Fang; Praveen Panguluri; Edward L Machtinger; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-01-25

Review 8.  Comparative pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of oral direct thrombin and factor xa inhibitors in development.

Authors:  Bengt I Eriksson; Daniel J Quinlan; Jeffrey I Weitz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Beliefs about medicines in Dutch acenocoumarol and phenprocoumon users.

Authors:  Talitha I Verhoef; W Ken Redekop; Marcel L Bouvy; Brenda Dorenbos; Zamiera Karwar; Rianne M F van Schie; Anthonius de Boer; Anke-Hilse Maitland-van der Zee
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants in patients with sickle cell disease and venous thromboembolism: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Megan Z Roberts; G Eric Gaskill; Julie Kanter-Washko; T Rogers Kyle; Brittany C Jones; Nicole M Bohm
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.