Adam J Rose1, Donald R Miller2, Al Ozonoff3, Dan R Berlowitz4, Arlene S Ash5, Shibei Zhao6, Joel I Reisman6, Elaine M Hylek7. 1. Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research, Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford; Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston. Electronic address: adamrose@bu.edu. 2. Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research, Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford; Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston. 3. Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research, Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford; Biostatistics Section, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston. 4. Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research, Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford; Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston; Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston. 5. Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research, Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford; Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (Dr Ash), Division of Biostatistics and Health Services Research, University of Massachusetts School of Medicine, Worcester, MA. 6. Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research, Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford. 7. Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research, Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford; Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Among patients receiving oral anticoagulation, a gap of > 56 days between international normalized ratio tests suggests loss to follow-up that could lead to poor anticoagulation control and serious adverse events. METHODS: We studied long-term oral anticoagulation care for 56,490 patients aged 65 years and older at 100 sites of care in the Veterans Health Administration. We used the rate of gaps in monitoring per patient-year to predict percentage time in therapeutic range (TTR) at the 100 sites. RESULTS: Many patients (45%) had at least one gap in monitoring during an average of 1.6 years of observation; 5% had two or more gaps per year. The median gap duration was 74 days (interquartile range, 62-107). The average TTR for patients with two or more gaps per year was 10 percentage points lower than for patients without gaps (P < .001). Patient-level predictors of gaps included nonwhite race, area poverty, greater distance from care, dementia, and major depression. Site-level gaps per patient-year varied from 0.19 to 1.78; each one-unit increase was associated with a 9.2 percentage point decrease in site-level TTR (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Site-level gap rates varied widely within an integrated care system. Sites with more gaps per patient-year had worse anticoagulation control. Strategies to address and reduce gaps in monitoring may improve anticoagulation control.
BACKGROUND: Among patients receiving oral anticoagulation, a gap of &gt; 56 days between international normalized ratio tests suggests loss to follow-up that could lead to poor anticoagulation control and serious adverse events. METHODS: We studied long-term oral anticoagulation care for 56,490 patients aged 65 years and older at 100 sites of care in the Veterans Health Administration. We used the rate of gaps in monitoring per patient-year to predict percentage time in therapeutic range (TTR) at the 100 sites. RESULTS: Many patients (45%) had at least one gap in monitoring during an average of 1.6 years of observation; 5% had two or more gaps per year. The median gap duration was 74 days (interquartile range, 62-107). The average TTR for patients with two or more gaps per year was 10 percentage points lower than for patients without gaps (P &lt; .001). Patient-level predictors of gaps included nonwhite race, area poverty, greater distance from care, dementia, and major depression. Site-level gaps per patient-year varied from 0.19 to 1.78; each one-unit increase was associated with a 9.2 percentage point decrease in site-level TTR (P &lt; .001). CONCLUSIONS: Site-level gap rates varied widely within an integrated care system. Sites with more gaps per patient-year had worse anticoagulation control. Strategies to address and reduce gaps in monitoring may improve anticoagulation control.
Authors: Adam J Rose; Elaine M Hylek; Al Ozonoff; Arlene S Ash; Joel I Reisman; Dan R Berlowitz Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2010-11-23
Authors: Adam J Rose; Beth Ann Petrakis; Patricia Callahan; Scott Mambourg; Dimple Patel; Elaine M Hylek; Barbara G Bokhour Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Stuart J Connolly; Janice Pogue; John Eikelboom; Gregory Flaker; Patrick Commerford; Maria Grazia Franzosi; Jeffrey S Healey; Salim Yusuf Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-10-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alan S Go; Elaine M Hylek; Yuchiao Chang; Kathleen A Phillips; Lori E Henault; Angela M Capra; Nancy G Jensvold; Joe V Selby; Daniel E Singer Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-11-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Felix Yang; Jessica A Hellyer; Claire Than; Aditya J Ullal; Daniel W Kaiser; Paul A Heidenreich; Donald D Hoang; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Susan Schmitt; Susan M Frayne; Ciaran S Phibbs; Mintu P Turakhia Journal: Heart Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Supriya Shore; Evan P Carey; Mintu P Turakhia; Cynthia A Jackevicius; Fran Cunningham; Louise Pilote; Steven M Bradley; Thomas M Maddox; Gary K Grunwald; Anna E Barón; John S Rumsfeld; Paul D Varosy; Preston M Schneider; Lucas N Marzec; P Michael Ho Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2014-04-05 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Roland von Känel; Angelina Margani; Stefanie Stauber; Fiorenza A Meyer; Franziska Demarmels Biasiutti; Franziska Vökt; Thomas Wissmann; Bernhard Lämmle; Paul S Lukas Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anna K Stuck; Marie Méan; Andreas Limacher; Marc Righini; Kurt Jaeger; Hans-Jürg Beer; Joseph Osterwalder; Beat Frauchiger; Christian M Matter; Nils Kucher; Michael Egloff; Markus Aschwanden; Marc Husmann; Anne Angelillo-Scherrer; Nicolas Rodondi; Drahomir Aujesky Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 3.240