Literature DB >> 30352669

Facility-level changes in receipt of pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorder: Implications for implementation science.

Andrea K Finlay1, Ingrid A Binswanger2, Christine Timko3, David Smelson4, Matthew A Stimmel5, Mengfei Yu6, Tom Bowe7, Alex H S Harris8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The U.S. is facing an opioid epidemic, but despite mandates for pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorder to be available at Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities, the majority of veterans with opioid use disorder do not receive these medications. In implementation research, facilities are often targeted for qualitative inquiry or quality improvement efforts based on quality measure performance during a one-year period. However, sites that experience quality performance changes from one year to the next may be highly informative because mechanisms that impact facility change may be more discoverable. The current study examined changes in receipt of pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorder in a national healthcare system to determine the extent to which sites fluctuated in performance over a two-year period and illustrate how changes in quality measures over time may be useful for implementation research and healthcare surveillance of quality measures.
METHODS: Using national VHA data from Fiscal Years (FY) 2016 and 2017, we calculated quality measure performance as the number of patients who received pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorder (i.e., methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone) divided by the number of patients with a current non-remitted opioid use disorder diagnosis for each FY at each facility (n = 129) and examined change from FY16 to FY17.
RESULTS: The mean rate of receipt of pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorder was 38% (facility range = 3% to 74%) in FY16 and 41% (facility range = 2% to 76%) in FY17. The average facility-level change in performance was 3% and ranged from -19% to 26%. There were 32 facilities that decreased in provision of pharmacotherapy, 12 facilities with no change, and 85 facilities that increased.
CONCLUSIONS: For facilities with average or high performance, it was difficult to maintain their performance over time. Identifying and learning from facilities with recent fluctuations may be more informative to guide the design of future quality improvement efforts than studying facilities with stable high or low performance. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Buprenorphine; Implementation science; Methadone; Opioid-related disorders; Pharmacotherapy; United States Department of Veterans Affairs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30352669      PMCID: PMC6209329          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat        ISSN: 0740-5472


  25 in total

1.  Organizational characteristics of high- and low-performing anticoagulation clinics in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Adam J Rose; Beth Ann Petrakis; Patricia Callahan; Scott Mambourg; Dimple Patel; Elaine M Hylek; Barbara G Bokhour
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Variation in the implementation of California's Full Service Partnerships for persons with serious mental illness.

Authors:  Todd P Gilmer; Marian L Katz; Ana Stefancic; Lawrence A Palinkas
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Receipt of opioid agonist treatment in the Veterans Health Administration: facility and patient factors.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Oliva; Alex H S Harris; Jodie A Trafton; Adam J Gordon
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 4.  An overview of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of opiate maintenance therapies: available evidence to inform clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Laura Amato; Marina Davoli; Carlo A Perucci; Marica Ferri; Fabrizio Faggiano; Richard P Mattick
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2005-06

5.  Barriers to the implementation of medication-assisted treatment for substance use disorders: the importance of funding policies and medical infrastructure.

Authors:  Hannah K Knudsen; Amanda J Abraham; Carrie B Oser
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2011-03-02

6.  When quality indicators undermine quality: bias in a quality indicator of follow-up for alcohol misuse.

Authors:  Katharine A Bradley; Laura J Chavez; Gwendolyn T Lapham; Emily C Williams; Carol E Achtmeyer; Anna D Rubinsky; Eric J Hawkins; Richard Saitz; Daniel R Kivlahan
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Are Improvements in Measured Performance Driven by Better Treatment or "Denominator Management"?

Authors:  Alex H S Harris; Cheng Chen; Anna D Rubinsky; Katherine J Hoggatt; Matthew Neuman; Megan E Vanneman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Specifying and Pilot Testing Quality Measures for the American Society of Addiction Medicine's Standards of Care.

Authors:  Alex H S Harris; Constance M Weisner; Mady Chalk; Victor Capoccia; Cheng Chen; Cindy Parks Thomas
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.702

9.  Receipt of pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorder by justice-involved U.S. Veterans Health Administration patients.

Authors:  Andrea K Finlay; Alex H S Harris; Joel Rosenthal; Jessica Blue-Howells; Sean Clark; Jim McGuire; Christine Timko; Susan M Frayne; David Smelson; Elizabeth Oliva; Ingrid Binswanger
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-01-24       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Overdose Deaths Involving Opioids, Cocaine, and Psychostimulants - United States, 2015-2016.

Authors:  Puja Seth; Lawrence Scholl; Rose A Rudd; Sarah Bacon
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Importance of Learning Health Systems in Addressing the Opioid Crisis.

Authors:  Wilson M Compton; Tisha Wiley; Carlos Blanco
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Barriers to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Among Veterans Involved in the Legal System: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Andrea K Finlay; Erica Morse; Matthew Stimmel; Emmeline Taylor; Christine Timko; Alex H S Harris; David Smelson; Mengfei Yu; Jessica Blue-Howells; Ingrid A Binswanger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Opioid Agonist Therapy During Hospitalization Within the Veterans Health Administration: a Pragmatic Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Kelsey C Priest; Travis I Lovejoy; Honora Englander; Sarah Shull; Dennis McCarty
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Strategies to improve implementation of medications for opioid use disorder reported by veterans involved in the legal system: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Erica Morse; Ingrid A Binswanger; Emmeline Taylor; Caroline Gray; Matthew Stimmel; Christine Timko; Alex H S Harris; David Smelson; Andrea K Finlay
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2021-03-04

5.  A national survey of barriers and facilitators to medications for opioid use disorder among legal-involved veterans in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Emmeline N Taylor; Christine Timko; Ingrid A Binswanger; Alex H S Harris; Matthew Stimmel; David Smelson; Andrea K Finlay
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.984

6.  Disparities in Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Andrea K Finlay; Alex H S Harris; Christine Timko; Mengfei Yu; David Smelson; Matthew Stimmel; Ingrid A Binswanger
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.647

7.  Expanding Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder: Program and Policy Approaches from Outside the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Kelsey C Priest; Dennis McCarty; Travis I Lovejoy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 5.128

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.