Literature DB >> 22298872

Evaluation of breast lesions using sonographic elasticity imaging: a multicenter trial.

Richard G Barr1, Stamatia Destounis, Logan B Lackey, William E Svensson, Corinne Balleyguier, Carmel Smith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of real-time compression elasticity imaging in characterizing breast lesions as benign or malignant.
METHODS: A cohort of 578 women scheduled for sonographically guided biopsy of breast lesions were recruited from 6 sites under an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. All participants received an elastogram, which displayed both the B-mode and elasticity images in real time. The longest dimensions of the lesion on the B-mode and elasticity imaging were measured. An elasticity imaging/B-mode ratio of at least 1.0 was considered positive for malignant lesions. The reference standard was based on biopsy.
RESULTS: A total of 635 lesions were imaged and biopsied. There were 222 (35%) malignant or borderline lesions and 413 (65%) benign lesions. The benign lesions were either cystic (145 [35%]) or solid (268 [65%]). Of the 222 malignant lesions, 219 had an elasticity imaging/B-mode ratio of at least 1.0. Of the 413 benign lesions, 361 had an elasticity imaging/B-mode ratio less than 1.0. These results corresponded to overall sensitivity of 98.6% and overall specificity of 87.4%. Individual site sensitivities ranged from 96.7% to 100% whereas specificities ranged from 66.7% to 95.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: Elasticity imaging has high sensitivity in characterizing malignant lesions of the breast. Variability in specificity between sites and sonographers is possibly due to individual technique differences in performing elastography and measuring lesions. Further work in standardizing the technique is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22298872     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.2.281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  41 in total

1.  Combination of two-dimensional shear wave elastography with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system in the diagnosis of breast lesions: a new method to increase the diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Dan-Dan Li; Hui-Xiong Xu; Le-Hang Guo; Xiao-Wan Bo; Xiao-Long Li; Rong Wu; Jun-Mei Xu; Yi-Feng Zhang; Kun Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Auto strain ratio system for the quality control of breast strain elastography.

Authors:  Kazutaka Nakashima; Akiko Mizutou; Sayaka Sakurai
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 1.314

3.  Ultrasonographic characteristics and BI-RADS-US classification of BRCA1 mutation-associated breast cancer in Guangxi, China.

Authors:  Cheng Li; Junjie Liu; Sida Wang; Yuanyuan Chen; Zhigang Yuan; Jian Zeng; Zhixian Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

4.  Sonoelastography findings for idiopathic granulomatous mastitis.

Authors:  Afak Durur-Karakaya; Irmak Durur-Subasi; Mufide Nuran Akcay; Sare Sipal; Bülent Guvendi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Breast elastography: A literature review.

Authors:  A Goddi; M Bonardi; S Alessi
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2012-06-30

Review 6.  Frontiers of cancer imaging and guided therapy using ultrasound, light, and microwaves.

Authors:  Russell S Witte; Chandra Karunakaran; Andres N Zuniga; Hannah Schmitz; Hina Arif
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 5.150

7.  Modeling Uncertainty of Strain Ratio Measurements in Ultrasound Breast Strain Elastography: A Factorial Experiment.

Authors:  David Rosen; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 8.  MR Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Lori R Arlinghaus; Adrienne N Dula; C Chad Quarles; Ashley M Stokes; Jared A Weis; Jennifer G Whisenant; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Igor Zhukov; Jason M Williams; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

9.  Transrectal quantitative shear wave elastography in the detection and characterisation of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sarfraz Ahmad; Rui Cao; Tomy Varghese; Luc Bidaut; Ghulam Nabi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Small breast lesion classification performance using the normalized axial-shear strain area feature.

Authors:  Arun K Thittai; Jose-Miguel Yamal; Jonathan Ophir
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.