Literature DB >> 22298709

Understanding and predicting the fitness decline of shrunk populations: inbreeding, purging, mutation, and standard selection.

Aurora García-Dorado1.   

Abstract

The joint consequences of inbreeding, natural selection, and deleterious mutation on mean fitness after population shrinkage are of great importance in evolution and can be critical to the conservation of endangered populations. I present simple analytical equations that predict these consequences, improving and extending a previous heuristic treatment. Purge is defined as the "extra" selection induced by inbreeding, due to the "extra" fitness disadvantage (2d) of homozygotes for (partially) recessive deleterious alleles. Its effect is accounted for by using, instead of the classical inbreeding coefficient f, a purged inbreeding coefficient g that is weighed by the reduction of the frequency of deleterious alleles caused by purging. When the effective size of a large population is reduced to a smaller stable value N (with Nd ≥ 1), the purged inbreeding coefficient after t generations can be predicted as g(t) ≈ [(1 - 1/2N) g(t)(-1) + 1/2N](1 - 2d f(t)(-1)), showing how purging acts upon previously accumulated inbreeding and how its efficiency increases with N. This implies an early fitness decay, followed by some recovery. During this process, the inbreeding depression rate shifts from its ancestral value (δ) to that of the mutation-selection-drift balance corresponding to N (δ*), and standard selection cancels out the inbreeding depression ascribed to δ*. Therefore, purge and inbreeding operate only upon the remaining δ - δ*. The method is applied to the conservation strategy in which family contributions to the breeding pool are equal and is extended to make use of genealogical information. All these predictions are checked using computer simulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22298709      PMCID: PMC3316656          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.135541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  15 in total

Review 1.  The genetic basis of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; D Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Accumulation of deleterious mutations and equalization of parental contributions in the conservation of genetic resources.

Authors:  J Fernández; A Caballero
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Perspective: purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence.

Authors:  Peter Crnokrak; Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift versus nonrandom mating.

Authors:  Sylvain Glémin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Haploidy or diploidy: which is better?

Authors:  A S Kondrashov; J F Crow
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-05-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  An investigation of inbreeding depression and purging in captive pedigreed populations.

Authors:  E H Boakes; J Wang; W Amos
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Shortcut predictions for fitness properties at the mutation-selection-drift balance and for its buildup after size reduction under different management strategies.

Authors:  Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Inferring purging from pedigree data.

Authors:  Davorka Gulisija; James F Crow
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Role of inbreeding depression and purging in captive breeding and restoration programmes.

Authors:  Paul L Leberg; Brigette D Firmin
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  31 in total

1.  Inbreeding load and inbreeding depression estimated from lifetime reproductive success in a small, dispersal-limited population.

Authors:  Janna R Willoughby; Peter M Waser; Anna Brüniche-Olsen; Mark R Christie
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  On the consequences of ignoring purging on genetic recommendations for minimum viable population rules.

Authors:  A García-Dorado
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Inferring Individual Inbreeding and Demographic History from Segments of Identity by Descent in Ficedula Flycatcher Genome Sequences.

Authors:  Marty Kardos; Anna Qvarnström; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  From "the Worm" to "the Worms" and Back Again: The Evolutionary Developmental Biology of Nematodes.

Authors:  Eric S Haag; David H A Fitch; Marie Delattre
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Purging deleterious mutations in conservation programmes: combining optimal contributions with inbred matings.

Authors:  M Á R de Cara; B Villanueva; M Á Toro; J Fernández
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Inbreeding load and purging: implications for the short-term survival and the conservation management of small populations.

Authors:  A Caballero; I Bravo; J Wang
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Passenger pigeon genomic diversity and extinction.

Authors:  P W Hedrick
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Detection of genetic purging and predictive value of purging parameters estimated in pedigreed populations.

Authors:  Eugenio López-Cortegano; Diego Bersabé; Jinliang Wang; Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Royal dynasties as human inbreeding laboratories: the Habsburgs.

Authors:  F C Ceballos; G Alvarez
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Inbreeding reduces long-term growth of Alpine ibex populations.

Authors:  Claudio Bozzuto; Iris Biebach; Stefanie Muff; Anthony R Ives; Lukas F Keller
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 15.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.