Literature DB >> 30809076

Inbreeding load and inbreeding depression estimated from lifetime reproductive success in a small, dispersal-limited population.

Janna R Willoughby1,2, Peter M Waser3, Anna Brüniche-Olsen4, Mark R Christie3,4.   

Abstract

The fitness consequences of inbreeding and the individual behaviors that prevent its detrimental effects can be challenging to document in wild populations. Here, we use field and molecular data from a 17-year study of banner-tailed kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spectabilis) to quantify the relationship between inbreeding, mate kinship, and lifetime reproductive success. Using a pedigree that was reconstructed using genetic and field data within a Bayesian framework (median probability of parental assignment = 0.92, mean pedigree depth = 6 generations), we estimated both inbreeding coefficients and kinship between individuals that produced offspring (mean inbreeding coefficient = 0.07, mean mate kinship = 0.08). We also used the pedigree, in combination with census data, to generate a series of fitness estimates, ranging from survival to reproductive maturity to lifetime reproductive success. We found that the population's inbreeding load was low to moderate (0.98-4.66 haploid lethal equivalents) and increased with the time frame over which fitness was estimated (lowest for survival to maturity, highest for adult-to-adult reproductive success). Fitness decreased with increasing inbreeding coefficients. For example, lifetime reproductive success was reduced by 24% for individuals with inbreeding coefficients greater than twice the population mean. Within full sibling pairs, the sibling with less-related mates produced an average of 30% more offspring over its lifetime. These data further illustrate that inbreeding can have a negative effect on lifetime reproductive success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30809076      PMCID: PMC6781135          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-019-0197-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  35 in total

1.  Perspective: purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence.

Authors:  Peter Crnokrak; Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Severe inbreeding depression in a wild wolf (Canis lupus) population.

Authors:  Olof Liberg; Henrik Andrén; Hans-Christian Pedersen; Håkan Sand; Douglas Sejberg; Petter Wabakken; Mikael Kesson; Staffan Bensch
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  On valuing patches: estimating contributions to metapopulation growth with reverse-time capture-recapture modelling.

Authors:  Jamie S Sanderlin; Peter M Waser; James E Hines; James D Nichols
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.

Authors:  M D Jennions; M Petrie
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1997-05

5.  Inbreeding load and purging: implications for the short-term survival and the conservation management of small populations.

Authors:  A Caballero; I Bravo; J Wang
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Inbreeding depression across the lifespan in a wild mammal population.

Authors:  Jisca Huisman; Loeske E B Kruuk; Philip A Ellis; Tim Clutton-Brock; Josephine M Pemberton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Gene dispersal and outbreeding in a philopatric mammal.

Authors:  Jonathan B Winters; Peter M Waser
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Inbreeding depression in red deer calves.

Authors:  Craig A Walling; Daniel H Nussey; Alison Morris; Tim H Clutton-Brock; Loeske E B Kruuk; Josephine M Pemberton
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Predictive Model and Software for Inbreeding-Purging Analysis of Pedigreed Populations.

Authors:  Aurora García-Dorado; Jinliang Wang; Eugenio López-Cortegano
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Nonequivalent lethal equivalents: Models and inbreeding metrics for unbiased estimation of inbreeding load.

Authors:  Pirmin Nietlisbach; Stefanie Muff; Jane M Reid; Michael C Whitlock; Lukas F Keller
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 5.183

View more
  1 in total

1.  High-Quality Reference Genome for an Arid-Adapted Mammal, the Banner-Tailed Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys spectabilis).

Authors:  Avril M Harder; Kimberly K O Walden; Nicholas J Marra; Janna R Willoughby
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.416

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.