Literature DB >> 24899380

Detection of modulated tones in modulated noise by non-human primates.

Peter Bohlen1, Margit Dylla, Courtney Timms, Ramnarayan Ramachandran.   

Abstract

In natural environments, many sounds are amplitude-modulated. Amplitude modulation is thought to be a signal that aids auditory object formation. A previous study of the detection of signals in noise found that when tones or noise were amplitude-modulated, the noise was a less effective masker, and detection thresholds for tones in noise were lowered. These results suggest that the detection of modulated signals in modulated noise would be enhanced. This paper describes the results of experiments investigating how detection is modified when both signal and noise were amplitude-modulated. Two monkeys (Macaca mulatta) were trained to detect amplitude-modulated tones in continuous, amplitude-modulated broadband noise. When the phase difference of otherwise similarly amplitude-modulated tones and noise were varied, detection thresholds were highest when the modulations were in phase and lowest when the modulations were anti-phase. When the depth of the modulation of tones or noise was varied, detection thresholds decreased if the modulations were anti-phase. When the modulations were in phase, increasing the depth of tone modulation caused an increase in tone detection thresholds, but increasing depth of noise modulations did not affect tone detection thresholds. Changing the modulation frequency of tone or noise caused changes in threshold that saturated at modulation frequencies higher than 20 Hz; thresholds decreased when the tone and noise modulations were in phase and decreased when they were anti-phase. The relationship between reaction times and tone level were not modified by manipulations to the nature of temporal variations in the signal or noise. The changes in behavioral threshold were consistent with a model where the brain subtracted noise from signal. These results suggest that the parameters of the modulation of signals and maskers heavily influence detection in very predictable ways. These results are consistent with some results in humans and avians and form the baseline for neurophysiological studies of mechanisms of detection in noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24899380      PMCID: PMC4164687          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-014-0467-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  64 in total

1.  Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  B S Krishna; M N Semple
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Comodulation detection differences with multiple signal bands.

Authors:  B A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A retinal circuit that computes object motion.

Authors:  Stephen A Baccus; Bence P Olveczky; Mihai Manu; Markus Meister
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Effects of temporal fringes on fundamental-frequency discrimination.

Authors:  C Micheyl; R P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Across-critical-band processing of amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  W A Yost; S Sheft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Comodulation masking release for various monaural and binaural combinations of the signal, on-frequency, and flanking bands.

Authors:  G P Schooneveldt; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Enhancement of neural synchronization in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. II. Responses in the tuning curve tail.

Authors:  P X Joris; P H Smith; T C Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Neural correlates of auditory scene analysis based on inharmonicity in monkey primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Yonatan I Fishman; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Neural encoding of amplitude modulation within the auditory midbrain of squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  P Müller-Preuss; C Flachskamm; A Bieser
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 10.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.231

View more
  14 in total

1.  Noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  M D Valero; J A Burton; S N Hauser; T A Hackett; R Ramachandran; M C Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Masking Differentially Affects Envelope-following Responses in Young and Aged Animals.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Modulation-frequency-specific adaptation in awake auditory cortex.

Authors:  Brian J Malone; Ralph E Beitel; Maike Vollmer; Marc A Heiser; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neuronal adaptation to sound statistics in the inferior colliculus of behaving macaques does not reduce the effectiveness of the masking noise.

Authors:  Francesca Rocchi; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Effects of noise overexposure on tone detection in noise in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Samantha N Hauser; Jane A Burton; Evan T Mercer; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Amplitude modulation encoding in the auditory cortex: comparisons between the primary and middle lateral belt regions.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Mamiko Niwa; Kevin N O'Connor; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Contribution of spiking activity in the primary auditory cortex to detection in noise.

Authors:  Kate L Christison-Lagay; Sharath Bennur; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Frequency selectivity in macaque monkeys measured using a notched-noise method.

Authors:  Jane A Burton; Margit E Dylla; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Spatial and temporal disparity in signals and maskers affects signal detection in non-human primates.

Authors:  Francesca Rocchi; Margit E Dylla; Peter A Bohlen; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Changes in audiometric threshold and frequency selectivity correlate with cochlear histopathology in macaque monkeys with permanent noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Jane A Burton; Chase A Mackey; Kaitlyn S MacDonald; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.