Literature DB >> 22284969

Predicting clinical outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Eugene K Cha1, Shahrokh F Shariat, Matthias Kormaksson, Giacomo Novara, Thomas F Chromecki, Douglas S Scherr, Yair Lotan, Jay D Raman, Wassim Kassouf, Richard Zigeuner, Mesut Remzi, Karim Bensalah, Alon Weizer, Eiji Kikuchi, Christian Bolenz, Marco Roscigno, Theresa M Koppie, Casey K Ng, Hans-Martin Fritsche, Kazumasa Matsumoto, Thomas J Walton, Behfar Ehdaie, Stefan Tritschler, Harun Fajkovic, Juan I Martínez-Salamanca, Armin Pycha, Cord Langner, Vincenzo Ficarra, Jean-Jacques Patard, Francesco Montorsi, Christopher G Wood, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Vitaly Margulis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Novel prognostic factors for patients after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) have recently been described.
OBJECTIVE: We tested the prognostic value of pathologic characteristics and developed models to predict the individual probabilities of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) after RNU. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Our study included 2244 patients treated with RNU without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy at 23 international institutions. Tumor characteristics included T classification, grade, lymph node status, lymphovascular invasion, tumor architecture, location, and concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS). The cohort was randomly split for development (12 centers, n=1273) and external validation (11 centers, n=971).
INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent RNU. MEASUREMENTS: Univariable and multivariable models addressed RFS, CSS, and comparison of discrimination and calibration with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage grouping. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: At a median follow-up of 45 mo, 501 patients (22.3%) experienced disease recurrence and 418 patients (18.6%) died of UTUC. On multivariable analysis, T classification (p for trend <0.001), lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.98; p=0.002), lymphovascular invasion (HR: 1.66; p<0.001), sessile tumor architecture (HR: 1.76; p<0.001), and concomitant CIS (HR: 1.33; p=0.035) were associated with disease recurrence. Similarly, T classification (p for trend<0.001), lymph node metastasis (HR: 2.23; p=0.001), lymphovascular invasion (HR: 1.81; p<0.001), and sessile tumor architecture (HR: 1.72; p=0.001) were independently associated with cancer-specific mortality. Our models achieved 76.8% and 81.5% accuracy for predicting RFS and CSS, respectively. In contrast to these well-calibrated models, stratification based upon AJCC stage grouping resulted in a large degree of heterogeneity and did not improve discrimination.
CONCLUSIONS: Using standard pathologic features, we developed highly accurate prognostic models for the prediction of RFS and CSS after RNU for UTUC. These models offer improvements in calibration over AJCC stage grouping and can be used for individualized patient counseling, follow-up scheduling, risk stratification for adjuvant therapies, and inclusion criteria for clinical trials. Copyright Â
© 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22284969     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  65 in total

1.  Genomic Characterization of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  John P Sfakianos; Eugene K Cha; Gopa Iyer; Sasinya N Scott; Emily C Zabor; Ronak H Shah; Qinghu Ren; Aditya Bagrodia; Philip H Kim; A Ari Hakimi; Irina Ostrovnaya; Ricardo Ramirez; Aphrothiti J Hanrahan; Neil B Desai; Arony Sun; Patrizia Pinciroli; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Guido Dalbagni; Nikolaus Schultz; Dean F Bajorin; Victor E Reuter; Michael F Berger; Bernard H Bochner; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; David B Solit; Jonathan A Coleman
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Prognostic importance of lymphovascular invasion in urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis.

Authors:  Matthew R Danzig; Katherine Mallin; James M McKiernan; Walter M Stadler; Srikala S Sridhar; Todd M Morgan; Bernard H Bochner; Cheryl T Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  HER2 overexpression is associated with worse outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

Authors:  Francesco Soria; Marco Moschini; Andrea Haitel; Gregory J Wirth; Jose A Karam; Christopher G Wood; Morgan Rouprêt; Vitaly Margulis; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Alberto Briganti; Jay D Raman; Solene-Florence Kammerer-Jacquet; Romain Mathieu; Karim Bensalah; Yair Lotan; Mehmet Özsoy; Mesut Remzi; Kilian M Gust; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Prognostic factors and predictive tools for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aurélie Mbeutcha; Morgan Rouprêt; Ashish M Kamat; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Giacomo Novara; Jay D Raman; Christian Seitz; Evanguelos Xylinas; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Role of lymph node dissection during radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: multi-institutional large retrospective study JCOG1110A.

Authors:  Junichi Inokuchi; Kentaro Kuroiwa; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Mikio Sugimoto; Toshiki Tanigawa; Hiroyuki Fujimoto; Momokazu Gotoh; Naoya Masumori; Osamu Ogawa; Masatoshi Eto; Chikara Ohyama; Akito Yamaguchi; Hideyasu Matsuyama; Tomohiko Ichikawa; Tomohiko Asano; Junki Mizusawa; Junko Eba; Seiji Naito
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Are there differences between de novo and secondary upper tract urothelial carcinoma tumours?

Authors:  Hanan Goldberg; Douglas C Cheung; Thenappan Chandrasekar; Zachary Klaassen; Christopher J D Wallis; Girish S Kulkarni; Rashid Sayyid; Andrew Evans; Mehdi Masoomian; Bharati Bapat; Theodorus van der Kwast; Robert J Hamilton; Alexandre Zlotta; Neil Fleshner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  Predictive tools for clinical decision-making and counseling of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Evanguelos Xylinas; Luis Kluth; Sibani Mangal; Morgan Roupret; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Prognostic implication of infiltrative growth pattern and establishment of novel risk stratification model for survival in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Takeshi Hashimoto; Jun Nakashima; Rie Inoue; Tatsuo Gondo; Yoshio Ohno; Masaaki Tachibana
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  A systematic review of the tools available for predicting survival and managing patients with urothelial carcinomas of the bladder and of the upper tract in a curative setting.

Authors:  Sarah J Drouin; David R Yates; Vincent Hupertan; Olivier Cussenot; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Prognostic role of ERCC1 protein expression in upper tract urothelial carcinoma following radical nephroureterectomy with curative intent.

Authors:  Aurélie Mbeutcha; Ilaria Lucca; Vitaly Margulis; Jose A Karam; Christopher G Wood; Michela de Martino; Romain Mathieu; Andrea Haitel; Evanguelos Xylinas; Luis Kluth; Morgan Rouprêt; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Alberto Briganti; Michael Rink; Malte Rieken; Alon Z Weizer; Jay D Raman; Nathalie Rioux-Leclecq; Christian Bolenz; Karim Bensalah; Yair Lotan; Christian Seitz; Mesut Remzi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Tobias Klatte
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.