Literature DB >> 23546544

Prognostic implication of infiltrative growth pattern and establishment of novel risk stratification model for survival in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Takeshi Hashimoto1, Jun Nakashima, Rie Inoue, Tatsuo Gondo, Yoshio Ohno, Masaaki Tachibana.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic significance of infiltrative growth pattern (INF) and to develop a novel risk stratification model for disease-specific survival (DSS) in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).
METHODS: This study included 113 patients with UTUC treated with radical nephroureterectomy. Pathological features, including INF, were compared with DSS. INF was classified into 3 patterns (INFa, INFb, and INFc). The prognostic factors of DSS were evaluated with univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model analyses. A risk stratification model based on the relative risks of DSS was then established. RESULT: Univariate analysis revealed that patients with high-grade tumor, pathological T stage ≥T3, a non-expanding infiltration pattern (INF ≥b), sessile-type carcinoma, the presence of lymphovascular invasion and positive lymph node involvement showed significantly lower survival rates than their respective counterparts. In the multivariate analysis, high grade tumor, positive lymph node involvement and INF ≥b were independent predictors for DSS (p < 0.05). The patients were stratified into 3 risk groups. The 5-year DSS rates were 94.4 % in the low-risk group, 67.5 % in the intermediate-risk group and 20.5 % in the high-risk group.
CONCLUSION: In addition to lymph node involvement and pathological tumor grade, INF is a novel independent prognostic factor in patients with UTUC treated with radical nephroureterectomy. Our risk stratification model developed using these 3 factors may help clinicians identify patients with a poor prognosis who might be good candidates for clinical trials of innovative therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23546544     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-013-0548-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  26 in total

1.  The prognostic significance of vascular invasion in upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Y Hasui; S Nishi; S Kitada; Y Osada; Y Asada
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Prognostic factors in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas: a comprehensive review of the current literature.

Authors:  Giovanni Lughezzani; Maximilian Burger; Vitaly Margulis; Surena F Matin; Giacomo Novara; Morgan Roupret; Shahrokh F Shariat; Christopher G Wood; Richard Zigeuner
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Implications of overweight in gastric cancer: A multicenter study in a Western patient population.

Authors:  J Kulig; M Sierzega; P Kolodziejczyk; J Dadan; M Drews; M Fraczek; A Jeziorski; M Krawczyk; T Starzynska; G Wallner
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 4.424

4.  Predicting clinical outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Eugene K Cha; Shahrokh F Shariat; Matthias Kormaksson; Giacomo Novara; Thomas F Chromecki; Douglas S Scherr; Yair Lotan; Jay D Raman; Wassim Kassouf; Richard Zigeuner; Mesut Remzi; Karim Bensalah; Alon Weizer; Eiji Kikuchi; Christian Bolenz; Marco Roscigno; Theresa M Koppie; Casey K Ng; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Thomas J Walton; Behfar Ehdaie; Stefan Tritschler; Harun Fajkovic; Juan I Martínez-Salamanca; Armin Pycha; Cord Langner; Vincenzo Ficarra; Jean-Jacques Patard; Francesco Montorsi; Christopher G Wood; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Vitaly Margulis
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Gastric carcinoma. A pathobiological classification.

Authors:  S C Ming
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Bladder Consensus Conference Committee.

Authors:  J I Epstein; M B Amin; V R Reuter; F K Mostofi
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 7.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Impact of tumor location on prognosis for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma managed by radical nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Jay D Raman; Casey K Ng; Douglas S Scherr; Vitaly Margulis; Yair Lotan; Karim Bensalah; Jean-Jacques Patard; Eiji Kikuchi; Francesco Montorsi; Richard Zigeuner; Alon Weizer; Christian Bolenz; Theresa M Koppie; Hendrik Isbarn; Claudio Jeldres; Wareef Kabbani; Mesut Remzi; Mathias Waldert; Christopher G Wood; Marco Roscigno; Mototsuga Oya; Cord Langner; J Stuart Wolf; Philipp Ströbel; Mario Fernández; Pierre Karakiewcz; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Significant predictive factors for prognosis of primary upper urinary tract cancer after radical nephroureterectomy in Taiwanese patients.

Authors:  Ching-Chia Li; Tu-Hao Chang; Wen-Jeng Wu; Hung-Lung Ke; Shu-Pin Huang; Pei-Chien Tsai; Shun-Jen Chang; Jung-Tsung Shen; Yii-Her Chou; Chun-Hsiung Huang
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  The prognostic predictors of primary ureteral transitional cell carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Wei-Ming Li; Ching-Chia Li; Hung-Lung Ke; Wen-Jeng Wu; Chun-Nung Huang; Chun-Hsiung Huang
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.