Literature DB >> 27101100

Prognostic factors and predictive tools for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review.

Aurélie Mbeutcha1,2, Morgan Rouprêt3, Ashish M Kamat4, Pierre I Karakiewicz5, Nathan Lawrentschuk6, Giacomo Novara7, Jay D Raman8, Christian Seitz1, Evanguelos Xylinas9, Shahrokh F Shariat10,11,12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and heterogeneous disease. Several clinical and biological prognostic factors have been identified in multi-institutional collaborative works with the aim of helping decision-making in pursuit of tailored individual patient care. This review provides an overview of these existing prognostic factors and predictive tools for the management of patients with UTUC.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus databases regarding articles published in English between January 2000 and November 2015 according to PRISMA guidelines. Thresholds of 100 and 300 patients were applied for studies on biomarkers and clinical studies, respectively. All the studies on predictive tools were included for analysis. Outcomes of interest were features associated with advanced-stage UTUC, disease recurrence and survival.
RESULTS: A total of 116 studies were included in this review. These large and/or multi-institutional studies have confirmed the prognostic value of standard pathological factors (i.e., tumor stage, grade and lymph node metastasis) and identified novel features such as lymphovascular invasion, tumor architecture, multifocality, concomitant CIS, variant histology and biomarker status among others. Based on these variables, several predictive tools have been developed; however, they often lack of validation. The value of these features and tools needs prospective testing.
CONCLUSION: Efforts provided by international collaboration groups have permitted to validate established features and identify new features of biologically and clinically aggressive UTUC. Further investigation on prognostic factors and biomarkers is still needed to assess the benefit of these features and tools on clinical decision-making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Disease recurrence; Nomograms; Predictive tools; Prognosis; Prognostic factors; Risk stratification; Survival; Upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27101100     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1826-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  120 in total

1.  Combining imaging and ureteroscopy variables in a preoperative multivariable model for prediction of muscle-invasive and non-organ confined disease in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Ricardo L Favaretto; Shahrokh F Shariat; Caroline Savage; Guilherme Godoy; Daher C Chade; Matthew Kaag; Bernard H Bochner; Jonathan Coleman; Guido Dalbagni
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Preoperative C-reactive protein as a prognostic predictor for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  You Luo; Sheng Jun Fu; Dong Li She; H U Xiong; L I Yang
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-24

3.  Racial differences in the outcome of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: an international study.

Authors:  Kazumasa Matsumoto; Giacomo Novara; Amit Gupta; Vitaly Margulis; Thomas J Walton; Marco Roscigno; Casey Ng; Eiji Kikuchi; Richard Zigeuner; Wassim Kassouf; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Vincenzo Ficarra; Guido Martignoni; Stefan Tritschler; Joaquin Carballido Rodriguez; Christian Seitz; Alon Weizer; Mesut Remzi; Jay D Raman; Christian Bolenz; Karim Bensalah; Theresa M Koppie; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Christopher G Wood; Francesco Montorsi; Masatsugu Iwamura; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Concomitant carcinoma in situ as an independent prognostic parameter for recurrence and survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter analysis of 772 patients.

Authors:  Wolfgang Otto; Shahrokh F Shariat; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Amit Gupta; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Wassim Kassouf; Guido Martignoni; Thomas J Walton; Stefan Tritschler; Shiro Baba; Patrick J Bastian; Juan I Martínez-Salamanca; Christian Seitz; Armin Pycha; Maximilian Burger; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence and cancer-specific death for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: comparison to American Joint Committee on Cancer staging classification.

Authors:  Behfar Ehdaie; Shahrokh F Shariat; Caroline Savage; Jonathan Coleman; Guido Dalbagni
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 1.510

6.  Influence of positive surgical margin status after radical nephroureterectomy on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma survival.

Authors:  Pierre Colin; Adil Ouzzane; David R Yates; François Audenet; Audenet François; Géraldine Pignot; Alexis Arvin-Berod; Olivier Merigot de Treigny; Guy Laurent; Antoine Valeri; Jacques Irani; Irani Jacques; Fabien Saint; Solène Gardic; Pascal Gres; François Rozet; Yann Neuzillet; Alain Ruffion; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  FGFR3 mutations indicate better survival in invasive upper urinary tract and bladder tumours.

Authors:  Johanna M M van Oers; Ellen C Zwarthoff; Ishtiaq Rehman; Abdel-Rahmene Azzouzi; Olivier Cussenot; Mark Meuth; Freddie C Hamdy; James W F Catto
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 8.  Challenges of cancer biomarker profiling.

Authors:  Karim Bensalah; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Advanced patient age is associated with inferior cancer-specific survival after radical nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Guilherme Godoy; Yair Lotan; Michael Droller; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Jay D Raman; Hendrik Isbarn; Alon Weizer; Mesut Remzi; Marco Roscigno; Eiji Kikuchi; Christian Bolenz; Karim Bensalah; Theresa M Koppie; Wassim Kassouf; Jeffrey C Wheat; Richard Zigeuner; Cord Langner; Christopher G Wood; Vitaly Margulis
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Cancer-specific survival after radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: proposal and multi-institutional validation of a post-operative nomogram.

Authors:  D R Yates; V Hupertan; P Colin; A Ouzzane; A Descazeaud; J A Long; G Pignot; S Crouzet; F Rozet; Y Neuzillet; M Soulie; T Bodin; A Valeri; O Cussenot; M Rouprêt
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  23 in total

1.  Tumour architecture, grade and location remain predictors of non-organ-confined upper tract urothelial carcinoma at time of radical nephroureterectomy: results from a multicenter Norwegian external validation study.

Authors:  Bjarte Almås; Stein Øverby; Ole J Halvorsen; Lars A R Reisæter; Jørg Assmus; Birgitte Carlsen; Anders Loe; Christian Beisland
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Reflections on personalized management of UTUC.

Authors:  Marianne Brehmer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  [Nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma : Effectiveness of single-dose intravesical chemotherapy].

Authors:  Annabel Spek
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Is neutrophil-to-lymphocytes ratio a clinical relevant preoperative biomarker in upper tract urothelial carcinoma? A meta-analysis of 4385 patients.

Authors:  Mihai Dorin Vartolomei; Shoji Kimura; Matteo Ferro; Liliana Vartolomei; Beat Foerster; Mohammad Abufaraj; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Single-dose intravesical chemotherapy after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Eu Chang Hwang; Niranjan J Sathianathen; Jae Hung Jung; Myung Ha Kim; Philipp Dahm; Michael C Risk
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-18

Review 6.  Risk stratification for kidney sparing procedure in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Zine-Eddine Khene; Romain Mathieu; Solène-Florence Kammerer-Jacquet; Thomas Seisen; Morgan Roupret; Shahrokh F Shariat; Benoit Peyronnet; Karim Bensalah
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-10

Review 7.  Predictive models and prognostic factors for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Aurélie Mbeutcha; Romain Mathieu; Morgan Rouprêt; Kilian M Gust; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-10

8.  Contemporary concepts and controversies in the diagnosis and management of urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Romain Mathieu
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-10

9.  Is preoperative chronic kidney disease status associated with oncologic outcomes in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma? A multicenter propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Ho Song Yu; Jun Eul Hwang; Ho Seok Chung; Yang Hyun Cho; Myung Soo Kim; Eu Chang Hwang; Kyung Jin Oh; Sun-Ouck Kim; Seung Il Jung; Taek Won Kang; Dong Deuk Kwon; Kwangsung Park; Soo Bang Ryu; Sung-Hoon Jung; Young Hoe Hur; Joon Hwa Noh; Myung Ki Kim; Ill Young Seo; Chul-Sung Kim; Sung Gu Kang; Seok Ho Kang; Jun Cheon
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-03-15

10.  Prognostic microRNAs in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: multicenter and international validation study.

Authors:  Laura Izquierdo; Ruth Montalbo; Mercedes Ingelmo-Torres; Carme Mallofré; Miguel Ramírez-Backhaus; Jose Rubio; Antoine G Van der Heijden; Ewout Schaafsma; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Ana Blanca; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Antonio Alcaraz; Lourdes Mengual
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.