Literature DB >> 16647278

Is cartilage thickness different in young subjects with and without patellofemoral pain?

C E Draper1, T F Besier, G E Gold, M Fredericson, A Fiene, G S Beaupre, S L Delp.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the differences in load-bearing patellofemoral joint cartilage thickness between genders. To determine the differences in load-bearing cartilage thickness between pain-free controls and individuals with patellofemoral pain.
METHODS: The articular cartilage thickness of the patella and anterior femur was estimated from magnetic resonance images in 16 young, pain-free control subjects (eight males, eight females) and 34 young individuals with patellofemoral pain (12 males, 22 females). The average age of all subjects was 28+/-4 years. The cartilage surfaces were divided into regions approximating the location of patellofemoral joint contact during knee flexion. The mean and peak cartilage thicknesses of each region were computed and compared using a repeated-measures Analysis of Variance.
RESULTS: On average, males had 22% and 23% thicker cartilage than females in the patella (P < 0.01) and femur (P < 0.05), respectively. Male control subjects had 18% greater peak patellar cartilage thickness than males with patellofemoral pain (P < 0.05); however, we did not detect differences in patellar cartilage thickness between female control subjects and females with patellofemoral pain (P = 0.45). We detected no significant differences in femoral cartilage thickness between the control and pain groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Thin cartilage at the patella may be one mechanism of patellofemoral pain in male subjects, but is unlikely to be a dominant factor in the development of pain in the female population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16647278     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  23 in total

1.  A methodology to accurately quantify patellofemoral cartilage contact kinematics by combining 3D image shape registration and cine-PC MRI velocity data.

Authors:  Bhushan S Borotikar; William H Sipprell; Emily E Wible; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  CURRENT CONCEPTS IN BIOMECHANICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN.

Authors:  Richard W Willy; Erik P Meira
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-12

3.  The Role of Cartilage Stress in Patellofemoral Pain.

Authors:  Thor F Besier; Saikat Pal; Christine E Draper; Michael Fredericson; Garry E Gold; Scott L Delp; Gary S Beaupré
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Topographical Variation of Human Femoral Articular Cartilage Thickness, T1rho and T2 Relaxation Times Is Related to Local Loading during Walking.

Authors:  Sam Van Rossom; Mariska Wesseling; Dieter Van Assche; Ilse Jonkers
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Differences in patellar cartilage thickness, transverse relaxation time, and deformational behavior: a comparison of young women with and without patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  Shawn Farrokhi; Patrick M Colletti; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  MRI-based analysis of patellofemoral cartilage contact, thickness, and alignment in extension, and during moderate and deep flexion.

Authors:  Benjamin R Freedman; Frances T Sheehan; Amy L Lerner
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Is There a Biomechanical Link Between Patellofemoral Pain and Osteoarthritis? A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Narelle Wyndow; Natalie Collins; Bill Vicenzino; Kylie Tucker; Kay Crossley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Sagittal plane tilting deformity of the patellofemoral joint: a new concept in patients with chondromalacia patella.

Authors:  Ertugrul Aksahin; Cem Nuri Aktekin; Onur Kocadal; Semra Duran; Cüneyd Gunay; Defne Kaya; Onur Hapa; Murad Pepe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  The coupled effects of crouch gait and patella alta on tibiofemoral and patellofemoral cartilage loading in children.

Authors:  Scott C E Brandon; Darryl G Thelen; Colin R Smith; Tom F Novacheck; Michael H Schwartz; Rachel L Lenhart
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  In vivo cartilage contact deformation in the healthy human tibiofemoral joint.

Authors:  J T Bingham; R Papannagari; S K Van de Velde; C Gross; T J Gill; D T Felson; H E Rubash; G Li
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 7.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.