Literature DB >> 19889417

Differences in patellofemoral contact mechanics associated with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

K D Connolly1, J L Ronsky, L M Westover, J C Küpper, R Frayne.   

Abstract

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a disorder of the patellofemoral (PF) joint in which abnormal tracking is often cited as a factor in pain development. PF tracking is partially dependent on passive stabilizers (ex: PF geometry). Relations amongst PFPS, PF tracking, and contact mechanics are poorly understood. In-vivo investigation of passive PF joint stabilizers including PF tracking, contact mechanics, cartilage thickness, and patellar shape will allow structural characterization of the PF joint and may highlight differences associated with PFPS. This study examined the role that passive stabilizers play in PFPS (n=10) versus healthy subjects (n=10). PF tracking (contact area centroid migration), cartilage thickness, shape, congruence, and contact patterns were quantified using magnetic resonance imaging during isometric loading at 15 degrees , 30 degrees , and 45 degrees of knee flexion. Distinct relationships were identified between patellar shape and tracking and contact, particularly at low flexion (15-30 degrees ). Healthy subjects exhibited distinct PF tracking and contact patterns related to Type I patella shape (80%) with increasing total contact area (p<0.001) and proximal centroid migration (15-30 degrees p=0.012; 30-45 degrees p<0.001) for increasing knee angles. PFPS subjects deviated from these patterns at low flexion, demonstrating higher total contact area than healthy subjects (p=0.046 at 15 degrees ), lack of proximal centroid migration (15-30 degrees ), and more Type II (30%) and III (20%) patella shapes. This study highlights a new finding that patellar shape combined with low degrees of flexion (15-30 degrees ) may be important to consider, as this is where PFPS tracking and contact patterns deviate from healthy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19889417     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.07.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  14 in total

Review 1.  Multiscale mechanics of articular cartilage: potentials and challenges of coupling musculoskeletal, joint, and microscale computational models.

Authors:  J P Halloran; S Sibole; C C van Donkelaar; M C van Turnhout; C W J Oomens; J A Weiss; F Guilak; A Erdemir
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  CHANGES IN PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT STRESS DURING RUNNING WITH THE APPLICATION OF A PREFABRICATED FOOT ORTHOTIC.

Authors:  Thomas G Almonroeder; Lauren C Benson; Kristian M O'Connor
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-12

3.  A methodology to accurately quantify patellofemoral cartilage contact kinematics by combining 3D image shape registration and cine-PC MRI velocity data.

Authors:  Bhushan S Borotikar; William H Sipprell; Emily E Wible; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  CURRENT CONCEPTS IN BIOMECHANICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN.

Authors:  Richard W Willy; Erik P Meira
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-12

5.  In vivo patellofemoral contact mechanics during active extension using a novel dynamic MRI-based methodology.

Authors:  B S Borotikar; F T Sheehan
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Influence of step rate and quadriceps load distribution on patellofemoral cartilage contact pressures during running.

Authors:  Rachel L Lenhart; Colin R Smith; Michael F Vignos; Jarred Kaiser; Bryan C Heiderscheit; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Computational wear simulation of patellofemoral articular cartilage during in vitro testing.

Authors:  Lingmin Li; Shantanu Patil; Nick Steklov; Won Bae; Michele Temple-Wong; Darryl D D'Lima; Robert L Sah; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Knee cartilage MRI with in situ mechanical loading using prospective motion correction.

Authors:  Thomas Lange; Julian Maclaren; Michael Herbst; Cris Lovell-Smith; Kaywan Izadpanah; Maxim Zaitsev
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  MRI-based analysis of patellofemoral cartilage contact, thickness, and alignment in extension, and during moderate and deep flexion.

Authors:  Benjamin R Freedman; Frances T Sheehan; Amy L Lerner
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Hip Strength Is Greater in Athletes Who Subsequently Develop Patellofemoral Pain.

Authors:  Kristen A Herbst; Kim D Barber Foss; Lauren Fader; Timothy E Hewett; Erik Witvrouw; Denver Stanfield; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.