Literature DB >> 31402520

Fully automated patellofemoral MRI segmentation using holistically nested networks: Implications for evaluating patellofemoral osteoarthritis, pain, injury, pathology, and adolescent development.

Ruida Cheng1, Natalia A Alexandridi2, Richard M Smith2, Aricia Shen2,3, William Gandler1, Evan McCreedy1, Matthew J McAuliffe1, Frances T Sheehan2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our clinical understanding of the relationship between 3D bone morphology and knee osteoarthritis, as well as our ability to investigate potential causative factors of osteoarthritis, has been hampered by the time-intensive nature of manually segmenting bone from MR images. Thus, we aim to develop and validate a fully automated deep learning framework for segmenting the patella and distal femur cortex, in both adults and actively growing adolescents.
METHODS: Data from 93 subjects, obtained from on institutional review board-approved protocol, formed the study database. 3D sagittal gradient recalled echo and gradient recalled echo with fat saturation images and manual models of the outer cortex were available for 86 femurs and 90 patellae. A deep-learning-based 2D holistically nested network (HNN) architecture was developed to automatically segment the patella and distal femur using both single (sagittal, uniplanar) and 3 cardinal plane (triplanar) methodologies. Errors in the surface-to-surface distances and the Dice coefficient were the primary measures used to quantitatively evaluate segmentation accuracy using a 9-fold cross-validation.
RESULTS: Average absolute errors for segmenting both the patella and femur were 0.33 mm. The Dice coefficients were 97% and 94% for the femur and patella. The uniplanar, relative to the triplanar, methodology produced slightly superior segmentation. Neither the presence of active growth plates nor pathology influenced segmentation accuracy.
CONCLUSION: The proposed HNN with multi-feature architecture provides a fully automatic technique capable of delineating the often indistinct interfaces between the bone and other joint structures with an accuracy better than nearly all other techniques presented previously, even when active growth plates are present.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HNN; MRI; deep Learning; femur; knees; osteoarthritis; patella; segmentation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31402520      PMCID: PMC6778709          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  36 in total

1.  Automatic segmentation of the bone and extraction of the bone-cartilage interface from magnetic resonance images of the knee.

Authors:  Jurgen Fripp; Stuart Crozier; Simon K Warfield; Sébastien Ourselin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Unsupervised segmentation and quantification of anatomical knee features: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  José G Tamez-Peña; Joshua Farber; Patricia C González; Edward Schreyer; Erika Schneider; Saara Totterman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Development of subject-specific and statistical shape models of the knee using an efficient segmentation and mesh-morphing approach.

Authors:  Mark A Baldwin; Joseph E Langenderfer; Paul J Rullkoetter; Peter J Laz
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Deep convolutional neural network and 3D deformable approach for tissue segmentation in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Zhaoye Zhou; Hyungseok Jang; Alexey Samsonov; Gengyan Zhao; Richard Kijowski
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Automatic magnetic resonance prostate segmentation by deep learning with holistically nested networks.

Authors:  Ruida Cheng; Holger R Roth; Nathan Lay; Le Lu; Baris Turkbey; William Gandler; Evan S McCreedy; Tom Pohida; Peter A Pinto; Peter Choyke; Matthew J McAuliffe; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-08-21

6.  Increased Patellar Volume/Width and Decreased Femoral Trochlear Width Are Associated With Adolescent Patellofemoral Pain.

Authors:  Richard M Smith; Barry P Boden; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Is anterior knee pain a predisposing factor to patellofemoral osteoarthritis?

Authors:  M R Utting; G Davies; J H Newman
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Fully automated segmentation of cartilage from the MR images of knee using a multi-atlas and local structural analysis method.

Authors:  June-Goo Lee; Serter Gumus; Chan Hong Moon; C Kent Kwoh; Kyongtae Ty Bae
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Automatic graph-cut based segmentation of bones from knee magnetic resonance images for osteoarthritis research.

Authors:  Sufyan Y Ababneh; Jeff W Prescott; Metin N Gurcan
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 8.545

10.  Application of a semi-automatic cartilage segmentation method for biomechanical modeling of the knee joint.

Authors:  Mimmi K Liukkonen; Mika E Mononen; Petri Tanska; Simo Saarakkala; Miika T Nieminen; Rami K Korhonen
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 1.763

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Data Science Trends Relevant to Nursing Practice: A Rapid Review of the 2020 Literature.

Authors:  Brian J Douthit; Rachel L Walden; Kenrick Cato; Cynthia P Coviak; Christopher Cruz; Fabio D'Agostino; Thompson Forbes; Grace Gao; Theresa A Kapetanovic; Mikyoung A Lee; Lisiane Pruinelli; Mary A Schultz; Ann Wieben; Alvin D Jeffery
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 2.  Studying osteoarthritis with artificial intelligence applied to magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Francesco Calivà; Nikan K Namiri; Maureen Dubreuil; Valentina Pedoia; Eugene Ozhinsky; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 20.543

3.  Automatic quadriceps and patellae segmentation of MRI with cascaded U2 -Net and SASSNet deep learning model.

Authors:  Ruida Cheng; Marion Crouzier; François Hug; Kylie Tucker; Paul Juneau; Evan McCreedy; William Gandler; Matthew J McAuliffe; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 4.  Future Directions in Patellofemoral Imaging and 3D Modeling.

Authors:  Navya Dandu; Derrick M Knapik; Nicholas A Trasolini; Athan G Zavras; Adam B Yanke
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-04-26

5.  Influence of the Fluoroscopy Setting towards the Patient When Identifying the MPFL Insertion Point.

Authors:  Alexander Korthaus; Tobias Dust; Markus Berninger; Jannik Frings; Matthias Krause; Karl-Heinz Frosch; Grégoire Thürig
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09

Review 6.  AI musculoskeletal clinical applications: how can AI increase my day-to-day efficiency?

Authors:  YiRang Shin; Sungjun Kim; Young Han Lee
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  A Comprehensive Survey on Bone Segmentation Techniques in Knee Osteoarthritis Research: From Conventional Methods to Deep Learning.

Authors:  Sozan Mohammed Ahmed; Ramadhan J Mstafa
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.