Literature DB >> 33875840

Prospective assessment of breast cancer risk from multimodal multiview ultrasound images via clinically applicable deep learning.

Xuejun Qian1,2, Jing Pei3,4, Hui Zheng5, Xinxin Xie5, Lin Yan6, Hao Zhang7, Chunguang Han3,4, Xiang Gao8, Hanqi Zhang5, Weiwei Zheng9, Qiang Sun3,4, Lu Lu8, K Kirk Shung10.   

Abstract

The clinical application of breast ultrasound for the assessment of cancer risk and of deep learning for the classification of breast-ultrasound images has been hindered by inter-grader variability and high false positive rates and by deep-learning models that do not follow Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) standards, lack explainability features and have not been tested prospectively. Here, we show that an explainable deep-learning system trained on 10,815 multimodal breast-ultrasound images of 721 biopsy-confirmed lesions from 634 patients across two hospitals and prospectively tested on 912 additional images of 152 lesions from 141 patients predicts BI-RADS scores for breast cancer as accurately as experienced radiologists, with areas under the receiver operating curve of 0.922 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.868-0.959) for bimodal images and 0.955 (95% CI = 0.909-0.982) for multimodal images. Multimodal multiview breast-ultrasound images augmented with heatmaps for malignancy risk predicted via deep learning may facilitate the adoption of ultrasound imaging in screening mammography workflows.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33875840     DOI: 10.1038/s41551-021-00711-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng        ISSN: 2157-846X            Impact factor:   25.671


  36 in total

1.  Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Hye-Jeong Lee; Eun-Kyung Kim; Min Jung Kim; Ji Hyun Youk; Ji Young Lee; Dae Ryong Kang; Ki Keun Oh
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 2.  Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential.

Authors:  Kunio Doi
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses.

Authors:  Nouf Abdullah; Benoît Mesurolle; Mona El-Khoury; Ellen Kao
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Machine learning techniques for breast cancer computer aided diagnosis using different image modalities: A systematic review.

Authors:  Nisreen I R Yassin; Shaimaa Omran; Enas M F El Houby; Hemat Allam
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 6.  Breast and cervical cancer in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Kyle J Foreman; Allyne M Delossantos; Rafael Lozano; Alan D Lopez; Christopher J L Murray; Mohsen Naghavi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis From ACRIN 6666.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Andriy I Bandos; Ellen B Mendelson; Daniel Lehrer; Roberta A Jong; Etta D Pisano
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Global cancer statistics.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray; Melissa M Center; Jacques Ferlay; Elizabeth Ward; David Forman
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008-2030): a population-based study.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Ahmedin Jemal; Nathan Grey; Jacques Ferlay; David Forman
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Sensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Noriaki Ohuchi; Akihiko Suzuki; Tomotaka Sobue; Masaaki Kawai; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Ying-Fang Zheng; Yoko Narikawa Shiono; Hiroshi Saito; Shinichi Kuriyama; Eriko Tohno; Tokiko Endo; Akira Fukao; Ichiro Tsuji; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Yasuo Ohashi; Mamoru Fukuda; Takanori Ishida
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Shifting machine learning for healthcare from development to deployment and from models to data.

Authors:  Angela Zhang; Lei Xing; James Zou; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 25.671

2.  A K+-sensitive AND-gate dual-mode probe for simultaneous tumor imaging and malignancy identification.

Authors:  Qiyue Wang; Fangyuan Li; Zeyu Liang; Hongwei Liao; Bo Zhang; Peihua Lin; Xun Liu; Shen Hu; Jiyoung Lee; Daishun Ling
Journal:  Natl Sci Rev       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 23.178

3.  Using an Improved Residual Network to Identify PIK3CA Mutation Status in Breast Cancer on Ultrasound Image.

Authors:  Wen-Qian Shen; Yanhui Guo; Wan-Er Ru; Cheukfai Li; Guo-Chun Zhang; Ning Liao; Guo-Qing Du
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Artificial intelligence system reduces false-positive findings in the interpretation of breast ultrasound exams.

Authors:  Yiqiu Shen; Farah E Shamout; Jamie R Oliver; Jan Witowski; Kawshik Kannan; Jungkyu Park; Nan Wu; Connor Huddleston; Stacey Wolfson; Alexandra Millet; Robin Ehrenpreis; Divya Awal; Cathy Tyma; Naziya Samreen; Yiming Gao; Chloe Chhor; Stacey Gandhi; Cindy Lee; Sheila Kumari-Subaiya; Cindy Leonard; Reyhan Mohammed; Christopher Moczulski; Jaime Altabet; James Babb; Alana Lewin; Beatriu Reig; Linda Moy; Laura Heacock; Krzysztof J Geras
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 17.694

5.  Deep learning radiomics based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound images for assisted diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Tong Tong; Jionghui Gu; Dong Xu; Ling Song; Qiyu Zhao; Fang Cheng; Zhiqiang Yuan; Shuyuan Tian; Xin Yang; Jie Tian; Kun Wang; Tian'an Jiang
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Bioinformatics and Experimental Analysis of the Prognostic and Predictive Value of the CHPF Gene on Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Wan-Wan Li; Bin Liu; Shu-Qing Dong; Shi-Qing He; Yu-Ying Liu; Si-Yu Wei; Jing-Yi Mou; Jia-Xin Zhang; Zhao Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Performance of Deep Learning-Based Algorithm for Detection of Pediatric Intussusception on Abdominal Ultrasound Images.

Authors:  Zheming Li; Chunze Song; Jian Huang; Jing Li; Shoujiang Huang; Baoxin Qian; Xing Chen; Shasha Hu; Ting Shu; Gang Yu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 1.919

Review 8.  Ultrasound radiomics in personalized breast management: Current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Jionghui Gu; Tian'an Jiang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 5.738

9.  Breast lesion detection using an anchor-free network from ultrasound images with segmentation-based enhancement.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Yudong Yao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 10.  Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Biliary Atresia: From Conventional Ultrasound to Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Wenying Zhou; Luyao Zhou
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.