Literature DB >> 24081648

Potential role of shear-wave ultrasound elastography for the differential diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions: preliminary report.

Kyung Hee Ko1, Hae Kyoung Jung, So Joong Kim, Hyerin Kim, Jung Hyun Yoon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report our preliminary experience with shear-wave elastography (SWE) for non-mass lesions (NMLs) in the breast and suggest a potential ancillary role of SWE for BI-RADS Category 4a NMLs in reducing the number of unnecessary benign biopsies.
METHODS: A total of 310 breast lesions in 286 consecutive women who had been scheduled for US-guided automated gun biopsy or vacuum-assisted biopsy between June and December 2012 were initially included in this study. Finally, 33 women with 34 breast lesions classified as NMLs constituted our study population. Diagnostic performances of each quantitative SWE parameter were calculated. Histological diagnosis was used as a reference standard.
RESULTS: Among the 34 breast NMLs, 22 (65%) were benign and 12 (35%) were malignant. Emean value with cut-off set at 41.6 kPa had the highest Az value 0.788 (95% CI, 0.625-0.951), showing sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 68.2%. By applying an Emean value of 41.6 kPa or less as a criterion for downgrading soft BI-RADS category 4a NMLs to category 3 NMLs, 15 unnecessary biopsies could have been eliminated from the 19 BI-RADS category 4a lesions (79%).
CONCLUSIONS: SWE features could increase positive predictive values and reduce unnecessary benign biopsies of category 4a NMLs. KEY POINTS: • Ultrasound elastography is increasingly used to assess the stiffness of breast lesions • Shear-wave elastography provides useful information about non-mass breast lesions • Shear-wave elastography may render some biopsies of non-mass breast lesions unnecessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24081648     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-3034-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  26 in total

1.  Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; David O Cosgrove; Caroline J Doré; Fritz K W Schäfer; William E Svensson; Regina J Hooley; Ralf Ohlinger; Ellen B Mendelson; Catherine Balu-Maestro; Martina Locatelli; Christophe Tourasse; Barbara C Cavanaugh; Valérie Juhan; A Thomas Stavros; Anne Tardivon; Joel Gay; Jean-Pierre Henry; Claude Cohen-Bacrie
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features.

Authors:  Andrea S Hong; Eric L Rosen; Mary S Soo; Jay A Baker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Screening-detected and symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the sonographic and pathologic features.

Authors:  Hee Jung Shin; Hak Hee Kim; Sun Mi Kim; Gui Young Kwon; Gyungyub Gong; On Koo Cho
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Ultrasonographic detection and characterization of asymptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation.

Authors:  Yeon Ju Gwak; Hye Jung Kim; Jin Young Kwak; Sang Kwon Lee; Kyung Min Shin; Hui Joong Lee; Gab Chul Kim; Yun-Jin Jang; Man Hoon Han; Ji Young Park; Jin Hyang Jung
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  Diagnostic performances of shear wave elastography: which parameter to use in differential diagnosis of solid breast masses?

Authors:  Eun Jung Lee; Hae Kyoung Jung; Kyung Hee Ko; Jong Tae Lee; Jung Hyun Yoon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Visually assessed colour overlay features in shear-wave elastography for breast masses: quantification and diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Hye Mi Gweon; Ji Hyun Youk; Eun Ju Son; Jeong-Ah Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Shear-wave elastography in the diagnosis of solid breast masses: what leads to false-negative or false-positive results?

Authors:  Jung Hyun Yoon; Hae Kyoung Jung; Jong Tae Lee; Kyung Hee Ko
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Stiffness of tumours measured by shear-wave elastography correlated with subtypes of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jung Min Chang; In Ae Park; Su Hyun Lee; Won Hwa Kim; Min Sun Bae; Hye Ryoung Koo; Ann Yi; Seung Ja Kim; Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses.

Authors:  Andrew Evans; Patsy Whelehan; Kim Thomson; Denis McLean; Katrin Brauer; Colin Purdie; Lee Jordan; Lee Baker; Alastair Thompson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Ultrasound findings and histological features of ductal carcinoma in situ detected by ultrasound examination alone.

Authors:  Ayumi Izumori; Koji Takebe; Akira Sato
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 4.239

View more
  23 in total

1.  Comparison of shear wave velocities on ultrasound elastography between different machines, transducers, and acquisition depths: a phantom study.

Authors:  Hyun Joo Shin; Myung-Joon Kim; Ha Yan Kim; Yun Ho Roh; Mi-Jung Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Additional diagnostic value of shear-wave elastography and color Doppler US for evaluation of breast non-mass lesions detected at B-mode US.

Authors:  Ji Soo Choi; Boo-Kyung Han; Eun Young Ko; Eun Sook Ko; Jung Hee Shin; Ga Ram Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions: factors associated with false negative and false positive results.

Authors:  So Yoon Park; Ji Soo Choi; Boo-Kyung Han; Eun Young Ko; Eun Sook Ko
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Spatial coordinate corrected motion tracking for optical coherence elastography.

Authors:  Xuan Liu; Basil Hubbi; Xianlian Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Shear-Wave Elastography Features of Primary Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the Breast: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Youdong Kim; Kyung Hee Ko; Hae Kyoung Jung; Hyun Ju Lee
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-12-01

6.  Can shear wave elastography be utilized as an additional tool for the assessment of non-mass breast lesions?

Authors:  Sepideh Sefidbakht; Sara Haseli; Neda Khalili; Vahid Bazojoo; Pedram Keshavarz; Banafsheh Zeinali-Rafsanjani
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2021-03-17

7.  Diagnostic performance of 2D-shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of breast cancer: a clinical appraisal of cutoff values.

Authors:  Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta; Alessia Angela Maria Orlando; Mariangela Dimarco; Calogero Zarcaro; Fabiola Ferraro; Alessandra Cirino; Domenica Matranga; Salvatore Vieni; Daniela Cabibi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 6.313

8.  Tumor stiffness measured by quantitative and qualitative shear wave elastography of breast cancer.

Authors:  Eun Jee Song; Yu-Mee Sohn; Mirinae Seo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  The significance of dual-mode elastography in the diagnosis of breast lesions by physicians with different levels of experience.

Authors:  Sijing Huang; Xiuqin Ye; Keen Yang; Hongtian Tian; Zhimin Ding; Jing Chen; Jinfeng Xu; Fajin Dong
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02

10.  Prediction of high nodal burden in invasive breast cancer by quantitative shear wave elastography.

Authors:  Bo Li; Xin Zhao; Qiucheng Wang; Hui Jing; Hua Shao; Lei Zhang; Wen Cheng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.