Literature DB >> 22281281

Evaluating the quality of Internet health resources in pediatric urology.

Angela M Fast1, Christopher M Deibert, Gregory W Hruby, Kenneth I Glassberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Many patients and their parents utilize the Internet for health-related information, but quality is largely uncontrolled and unregulated. The Health on the Net Foundation Code (HONcode) and DISCERN Plus were used to evaluate the pediatric urological search terms 'circumcision,' 'vesicoureteral reflux' and 'posterior urethral valves'.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A google.com search was performed to identify the top 20 websites for each term. The HONcode toolbar was utilized to determine whether each website was HONcode accredited and report the overall frequency of accreditation for each term. The DISCERN Plus instrument was used to score each website in accordance with the DISCERN Handbook. High and low scoring criteria were then compared.
RESULTS: A total of 60 websites were identified. For the search terms 'circumcision', 'posterior urethral valves' and 'vesicoureteral reflux', 25-30% of the websites were HONcode certified. Out of the maximum score of 80, the average DISCERN Plus score was 60 (SD = 12, range 38-78), 40 (SD = 12, range 22-69) and 45 (SD = 19, range 16-78), respectively. The lowest scoring DISCERN criteria included: 'Does it describe how the treatment choices affect overall quality of life?', 'Does it describe the risks of each treatment?' and 'Does it provide details of additional sources of support and information?' (1.35, 1.83 and 1.95 out of 5, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the poor quality of information that patients and their parents may use in decision-making and treatment choices. The two lowest scoring DISCERN Plus criteria involved education on quality of life issues and risks of treatment. Physicians should know how to best use these tools to help guide patients and their parents to websites with valid information.
Copyright © 2012 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22281281     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  21 in total

1.  Can Internet information on vertebroplasty be a reliable means of patient self-education?

Authors:  T Barrett Sullivan; Joshua T Anderson; Uri M Ahn; Nicholas U Ahn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Quality and readability of online information resources on insomnia.

Authors:  Yan Ma; Albert C Yang; Ying Duan; Ming Dong; Albert S Yeung
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Urologists in cyberspace: A review of the quality of health information from American urologists' websites using three validated tools.

Authors:  Lih-Ming Wong; Hanmu Yan; David Margel; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Consulting "Dr. YouTube": an objective evaluation of hypospadias videos on a popular video-sharing website.

Authors:  Amr Salama; Janet Panoch; Elhaam Bandali; Aaron Carroll; Sarah Wiehe; Stephen Downs; Mark P Cain; Richard Frankel; Katherine H Chan
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 1.830

5.  Assessment of readability, quality and popularity of online information on ureteral stents.

Authors:  Sarah Mozafarpour; Briony Norris; James Borin; Brian H Eisner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Accuracy and Readability of Websites on Kidney and Bladder Cancers.

Authors:  Samy A Azer; Maha M Alghofaili; Rana M Alsultan; Najla S Alrumaih
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Decision-Making Regarding Newborn Circumcision: A Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Allison M Morgan; Yue-Yung Hu; Andrea Benin; Gina M Lockwood
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-10-28

8.  Reliability, Readability and Quality of Online Information about Femoracetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Fatih Küçükdurmaz; Miguel M Gomez; Eric Secrist; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2015-07

Review 9.  A Systematic Review of the Factors that Patients Use to Choose their Surgeon.

Authors:  Alexander T Yahanda; Kelly J Lafaro; Gaya Spolverato; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Review of information technology for surgical patient care.

Authors:  Jamie R Robinson; Hannah Huth; Gretchen P Jackson
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.192

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.