Literature DB >> 26213699

Reliability, Readability and Quality of Online Information about Femoracetabular Impingement.

Fatih Küçükdurmaz1, Miguel M Gomez1, Eric Secrist1, Javad Parvizi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Internet has become the most widely-used source for patients seeking information more about their health and many sites geared towards this audience have gained widespread use in recent years. Additionally, many healthcare institutions publish their own patient-education web sites with information regarding common conditions. Little is known about how these resources impact patient health, though, as they have the potential both to inform and to misinform patients regarding their prognosis and possible treatments. In this study we investigated the reliability, readability and quality of information about femoracetabular impingement, a condition which commonly affects young patients.
METHODS: The terms "hip impingement" and "femoracetabular impingement" were searched in Google® in November 2013 and the first 30 results were analyzed. The LIDA scale was used to assess website accessibility, usability and reliability. The DISCERN scale was used to assess reliability and quality of information. The FRE score was used to assess readability.
RESULTS: The patient-oriented sites performed significantly worse in LIDA reliability, and DISCERN reliability. However, the FRE score was significantly higher in patient-oriented sites.
CONCLUSION: According to our results, the websites intended to attract patients searching for information regarding femoroacetabular impingement are providing a highly accessible, readable information source, but do not appear to apply a comparable amount of rigor to scientific literature or healthcare practitioner websites in regard to matters such as citing sources for information, supplying methodology and including a publication date. This indicates that while these resources are easily accessed by patients, there is potential for them to be a source of misinformation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hip; Impingement; Internet; Medical information; Reliability

Year:  2015        PMID: 26213699      PMCID: PMC4507068     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  19 in total

1.  The quality of health information on the internet.

Authors:  Gretchen P Purcell; Petra Wilson; Tony Delamothe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-09

2.  Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish.

Authors:  G K Berland; M N Elliott; L S Morales; J I Algazy; R L Kravitz; M S Broder; D E Kanouse; J A Muñoz; J A Puyol; M Lara; K E Watkins; H Yang; E A McGlynn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001 May 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach; John Powell; Oliver Kuss; Eun-Ryoung Sa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Specialized medical search-engines are no better than general search-engines in sourcing consumer information about androgen deficiency.

Authors:  D Ilic; T L Bessell; C A Silagy; S Green
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  [Do we need a chart of quality for websites related to cosmetic surgery?].

Authors:  S Smarrito; M Mitrofanoff; R Haddad; B Pavy
Journal:  Ann Chir Plast Esthet       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 0.660

6.  [Study of the health food information for cancer patients on Japanese websites].

Authors:  Keiko Kishimoto; Chie Yoshino; Noriko Fukushima
Journal:  Yakugaku Zasshi       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 0.302

7.  Quality of health information on the Internet in pediatric neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Darren R Hargrave; Ursula A Hargrave; Eric Bouffet
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  A new readability yardstick.

Authors:  R FLESCH
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1948-06

9.  Vascular surgery and the Internet: a poor source of patient-oriented information.

Authors:  L C Soot; G L Moneta; J M Edwards
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Evaluating the reliability of DISCERN: a tool for assessing the quality of written patient information on treatment choices.

Authors:  Charlotte E Rees; Jillyan E Ford; Charlotte E Sheard
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2002-07
View more
  13 in total

1.  Letter to Editor: Comments on "Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Online Patient Education Materials Pertaining to Pathology of the Hand".

Authors:  Mark R Nazal; Ali Parsa; Scott D Martin
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-07-17

2.  Response to Letter Regarding "Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Online Patient Education Materials Pertaining to Pathology of the Hand".

Authors:  Sheriff D Akinleye; Garret Garofolo-Gonzalez; Michael Montuori; Maya Deza Culbertson; Jennifer Hashem; David Marc Edelstein
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-07-31

3.  Readability, credibility and quality of patient information for hypogonadism and testosterone replacement therapy on the Internet.

Authors:  J A McBride; C C Carson; R M Coward
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.896

4.  What Are Your Patients Reading Online About Soft-tissue Fillers? An Analysis of Internet Information.

Authors:  Mona T Al-Taha; Sarah A Al Youha; Courtney E Bull; Michael B Butler; Jason G Williams
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-07-27

5.  A systematic review of pediatric clinical trials of high dose vitamin D.

Authors:  Nassr Nama; Kusum Menon; Klevis Iliriani; Supichaya Pojsupap; Margaret Sampson; Katie O'Hearn; Linghong Linda Zhou; Lauralyn McIntyre; Dean Fergusson; James D McNally
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Readability Assessment of Online Patient Education Material on Congestive Heart Failure.

Authors:  Akhil Kher; Sandra Johnson; Robert Griffith
Journal:  Adv Prev Med       Date:  2017-06-01

7.  Quality of Web Information About Palliative Care on Websites from the United States and Japan: Comparative Evaluation Study.

Authors:  Kouichi Tanabe; Kaho Fujiwara; Hana Ogura; Hatsuna Yasuda; Nobuyuki Goto; Fumiko Ohtsu
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2018-04-03

8.  Evaluating hospital websites in Kuwait to improve consumer engagement and access to health information: a cross-sectional analytical study.

Authors:  Dari Alhuwail; Zainab AlMeraj; Fatima Boujarwah
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Quality and readability of English-language Internet information for vestibular disorders.

Authors:  Lilian Felipe; Eldré W Beukes; Baylie A Fox; Vinaya Manchaiah
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.354

10.  Comparison of the Source and Quality of Information on the Internet Between Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Australian Experience.

Authors:  Brian M Devitt; Taylor Hartwig; Haydn Klemm; Filip T Cosic; James Green; Kate E Webster; Julian A Feller; Joseph F Baker
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-12-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.