Literature DB >> 28281091

Accuracy and Readability of Websites on Kidney and Bladder Cancers.

Samy A Azer1,2,3, Maha M Alghofaili4, Rana M Alsultan4, Najla S Alrumaih4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the scientific accuracy and the readability level of websites on kidney and bladder cancers. The search engines Google™, Yahoo™ and Bing™ were searched independently by assessors in November 2014 using the following keywords: "bladder cancer", "kidney cancer", "patient bladder cancer", "patient kidney cancer" and "bladder and kidney cancer". Only English-language websites were selected on the bases of predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Assessors independently reviewed the findings and evaluated the accuracy and quality of each website by using the DISCERN and the LIDA instruments. The readability of the websites was calculated using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Index and the Coleman-Liau Readability Index. Sixty-two websites were finally included in the study. The overall accuracy scores varied; for the DISCERN, the range was 28 to 76; out of 80 (mean ± SD, 47.1 ± 12.1; median = 46.0, interquartile range (IQR) = 19.2), and for the LIDA, the range was 52 to 125; out of 144 (mean ± SD, 101.9 ± 15.2; median, 103; IQR, 16.5). The creators of these websites were universities and research centres (n = 25, 40%), foundations and associations (n = 10, 16%), commercial and pharmaceutical companies (n = 13, 21%), charities and volunteer work (n = 4, 6%) and non-university educational bodies (n = 10, 16%). The readability scores (mean ± SD) were 11.2 ± 2.2 for the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Index and 11.2 ± 1.6 for the Coleman-Liau Readability Index. The accuracy and the quality of the websites on kidney and bladder cancers varied. In most websites, there were deficiencies in clarity of aims, presenting symptoms, investigations and treatment options. The readability matched grades 10-11 literacy levels-a level above the public readability level. The study highlights the needs for further improvement of the online information created for public and patients with kidney and bladder cancers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Kidney cancer; Online resources; Patients’ education; The Internet

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28281091     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1181-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  38 in total

1.  Evaluating the quality of Internet health resources in pediatric urology.

Authors:  Angela M Fast; Christopher M Deibert; Gregory W Hruby; Kenneth I Glassberg
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.830

Review 2.  Renal cancer.

Authors:  Umberto Capitanio; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Histological subtype is an independent predictor of outcome for patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Bradley C Leibovich; Christine M Lohse; Paul L Crispen; Stephen A Boorjian; R Houston Thompson; Michael L Blute; John C Cheville
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Evaluation of gastroenterology and hepatology articles on Wikipedia: are they suitable as learning resources for medical students?

Authors:  Samy A Azer
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.566

Review 5.  Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer.

Authors:  Maximilian Burger; James W F Catto; Guido Dalbagni; H Barton Grossman; Harry Herr; Pierre Karakiewicz; Wassim Kassouf; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Carlo La Vecchia; Shahrokh Shariat; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  The impact of CyberHealthcare on the physician-patient relationship.

Authors:  James G Anderson; Michelle R Rainey; Gunther Eysenbach
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.

Authors:  Tiffany M Walsh; Teresa A Volsko
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.258

8.  The quality and readability of colorectal cancer information on the internet.

Authors:  P Grewal; S Alagaratnam
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 9.  The doctor, the patient and the world-wide web: how the internet is changing healthcare.

Authors:  J A Powell; M Darvell; J A M Gray
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 18.000

10.  Inflammatory bowel disease: An evaluation of health information on the internet.

Authors:  Samy A Azer; Thekra I AlOlayan; Malak A AlGhamdi; Malak A AlSanea
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  5 in total

1.  Quality, Readability, and Understandability of German Booklets Addressing Melanoma Patients.

Authors:  Julia Brütting; Lydia Reinhardt; Maike Bergmann; Dirk Schadendorf; Christiane Weber; Wolfgang Tilgen; Carola Berking; Friedegund Meier
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.

Authors:  Alexandra Martin; J Ryan Stewart; Jeremy Gaskins; Erin Medlin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Content and Quality of Websites for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: An Environmental Scan.

Authors:  Michelle Smekal; Sarah Gil; Maoliosa Donald; Heather Beanlands; Sharon Straus; Gwen Herrington; Dwight Sparkes; Lori Harwood; Allison Tong; Allan Grill; Karen Tu; Blair Waldvogel; Chantel Large; Claire Large; Marta Novak; Matthew James; Meghan Elliott; Maria Delgado; Scott Brimble; Susan Samuel; Brenda R Hemmelgarn
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2019-07-30

4.  Readability of Cancer Clinical Trials Websites.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Melissa Beauchemin; Philip Garcia; Moshe Kelsen; Frances L Brogan; Gary K Schwartz; Corey H Basch
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

5.  Evaluation of the Liver Disease Information in Baidu Encyclopedia and Wikipedia: Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Fei Sun; Fuchun Yang; Shusen Zheng
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 5.428

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.