Literature DB >> 34709527

Decision-Making Regarding Newborn Circumcision: A Qualitative Analysis.

Allison M Morgan1, Yue-Yung Hu1,2,3, Andrea Benin3, Gina M Lockwood4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Circumcision of newborn males is left to parental preference, as medical necessity has not been demonstrated. For medical providers seeking to help parents make decisions and provide informed consent, there is little information regarding how parents gather and process information about circumcision. This study aimed to characterize the comprehensive range of parental attitudes, gaps in knowledge, and decision-making regarding circumcision.
METHODS: Qualitative data was obtained from semi-structured open-ended interviews conducted during the postpartum hospitalization. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded by multiple independent reviewers. A grounded theory approach was used to identify emergent themes regarding attitudes towards, sources of information about, and decision-making surrounding circumcision.
RESULTS: Ten mothers were interviewed, of whom six planned to circumcise and four did not. Major themes emerged: the importance of cultural norms, limited yet influential discussions, and the lack of, but desire for, more knowledge. Discussions with medical providers were often limited, though when physician conversation was more extensive, provider input was highly influential. Parents lacked evidence-based knowledge of the risks and benefits of the procedure. They uniformly desire more information and counseling from their medical providers. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study affirms the importance of sociocultural factors and identified a discrepancy between parents' desire for empiric information and the counsel offered by providers, identifying a need for improved parent counseling. The qualitative themes that emerged from this work enabled the development of a comprehensive conceptual model that can be further tested to develop a decision aid for circumcision of the newborn.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Circumcision; Decision aids; Decision-making; Qualitative methods

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34709527     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-021-03228-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  20 in total

1.  Evaluating the quality of Internet health resources in pediatric urology.

Authors:  Angela M Fast; Christopher M Deibert; Gregory W Hruby; Kenneth I Glassberg
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.830

2.  Circumcision, sexual dysfunction and the child's best interests: why the anatomical details matter.

Authors:  David P Lang
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Circumcision: we have heard from the experts; now let's hear from the parents.

Authors:  R Adler; M S Ottaway; S Gould
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Effect of parental education on decision-making about neonatal circumcision.

Authors:  Sharon L Binner; Joan M Mastrobattista; Mary-Clare Day; Laurie S Swaim; Manju Monga
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 0.954

5.  Attitudes and decision making about neonatal male circumcision in a Hispanic population in New York City.

Authors:  Gabriela M Bisono; Lisa Simmons; Robert J Volk; Dodi Meyer; Thomas C Quinn; Susan L Rosenthal
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 1.168

6.  Psychosocial factors influence parental decision for circumcision in pediatric males of African American descent.

Authors:  Chiledum Ahaghotu; Henry Okafor; Enaruna Igiehon; Ekwenzi Gray
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  Cultural bias in the AAP's 2012 Technical Report and Policy Statement on male circumcision.

Authors:  Morten Frisch; Yves Aigrain; Vidmantas Barauskas; Ragnar Bjarnason; Su-Anna Boddy; Piotr Czauderna; Robert P E de Gier; Tom P V M de Jong; Günter Fasching; Willem Fetter; Manfred Gahr; Christian Graugaard; Gorm Greisen; Anna Gunnarsdottir; Wolfram Hartmann; Petr Havranek; Rowena Hitchcock; Simon Huddart; Staffan Janson; Poul Jaszczak; Christoph Kupferschmid; Tuija Lahdes-Vasama; Harry Lindahl; Noni MacDonald; Trond Markestad; Matis Märtson; Solveig Marianne Nordhov; Heikki Pälve; Aigars Petersons; Feargal Quinn; Niels Qvist; Thrainn Rosmundsson; Harri Saxen; Olle Söder; Maximilian Stehr; Volker C H von Loewenich; Johan Wallander; Rene Wijnen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  After Cologne: male circumcision and the law. Parental right, religious liberty or criminal assault?

Authors:  Reinhard Merkel; Holm Putzke
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Rates of adverse events associated with male circumcision in U.S. medical settings, 2001 to 2010.

Authors:  Charbel El Bcheraoui; Xinjian Zhang; Christopher S Cooper; Charles E Rose; Peter H Kilmarx; Robert T Chen
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 10.  A systematic development process for patient decision aids.

Authors:  Angela Coulter; Diana Stilwell; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Patricia Dolan Mullen; Chirk Jenn Ng; Trudy van der Weijden
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.