Literature DB >> 27338543

Review of information technology for surgical patient care.

Jamie R Robinson1, Hannah Huth2, Gretchen P Jackson3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electronic health records (EHRs), computerized provider order entry (CPOE), and patient portals have experienced increased adoption by health care systems. The objective of this study was to review evidence regarding the impact of such health information technologies (HIT) on surgical practice.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify data-driven, nonsurvey studies about the effects of HIT on surgical care. Domain experts were queried for relevant articles. Two authors independently reviewed abstracts for inclusion criteria and analyzed full text of eligible articles.
RESULTS: A total of 2890 citations were identified. Of them, 32 observational studies and two randomized controlled trials met eligibility criteria. EHR or CPOE improved appropriate antibiotic administration for surgical procedures in 13 comparative observational studies. Five comparative observational studies indicated that electronically generated operative notes had increased accuracy, completeness, and availability in the medical record. The Internet as an information resource about surgical procedures was generally inadequate. Surgical patients and providers demonstrated rapid adoption of patient portals, with increasing proportions of online versus inperson outpatient surgical encounters.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall quality of evidence about the effects of HIT in surgical practice was low. Current data suggest an improvement in appropriate perioperative antibiotic administration and accuracy of operative reports from CPOE and EHR applications. Online consumer health educational resources and patient portals are popular among patients and families, but their impact has not been studied well in surgical populations. With increasing adoption of HIT, further research is needed to optimize the efficacy of such tools in surgical care.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computerized provider order entry; Electronic medical record; Electronic operative note; Health information technology; Internet; Patient portal

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27338543      PMCID: PMC4939767          DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  54 in total

1.  Electronic templates versus dictation for the completion of Mohs micrographic surgery operative notes.

Authors:  David A Cowan; Mandy B Sands; Susan M Rabizadeh; Charles S Amos; Carolyn Ford; Rachel Nussbaum; David Stein; Nanette J Liegeois
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.398

2.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  D L Hunt; R B Haynes; S E Hanna; K Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Point-of-care electronic prompts: an effective means of increasing compliance, demonstrating quality, and improving outcome.

Authors:  Nanette M Schwann; Karen A Bretz; Sherrine Eid; Terry Burger; Deborah Fry; Frederick Ackler; Paul Evans; David Romancheck; Michelle Beck; Anthony J Ardire; Harry Lukens; Thomas M McLoughlin
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2013.

Authors:  Chun-Ju Hsiao; Esther Hing
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2014-01

5.  Clinical documentation in the 21st century: executive summary of a policy position paper from the American College of Physicians.

Authors:  Thomson Kuhn; Peter Basch; Michael Barr; Thomas Yackel
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Case report: patient portal versus telephone recruitment for a surgical research study.

Authors:  R B Baucom; J Ousley; B K Poulose; S T Rosenbloom; G P Jackson
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.342

7.  Structured electronic operative reporting: comparison with dictation in kidney cancer surgery.

Authors:  Darryl N Hoffer; Antonio Finelli; Raymond Chow; Justin Liu; Tran Truong; Kelly Lane; Sanoj Punnen; Jennifer J Knox; Laura Legere; Ghada Kurban; Brenda Gallie; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2012-01-02       Impact factor: 4.046

8.  Improving timely surgical antibiotic prophylaxis redosing administration using computerized record prompts.

Authors:  Paul St Jacques; Neal Sanders; Nimesh Patel; Thomas R Talbot; Jayant K Deshpande; Michael Higgins
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.150

9.  Improving the electronic health record--are clinicians getting what they wished for?

Authors:  James J Cimino
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  'Smart' electronic operation notes in surgery: an innovative way to improve patient care.

Authors:  Yaser Ghani; Raj Thakrar; Dennis Kosuge; Peter Bates
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 6.071

View more
  1 in total

1.  Surgical Informatics: Defining the Role of Informatics in the Current Surgical Training Paradigm.

Authors:  Heather G Lyu; Gerard M Doherty; Adam B Landman
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 2.891

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.