Literature DB >> 22270938

Prospective study of breast tomosynthesis as a triage to assessment in screening.

Daniela Bernardi1, Stefano Ciatto, Marco Pellegrini, Paolina Tuttobene, Carmine Fanto', Marvi Valentini, Stefano Di Michele, Paolo Peterlongo, Nehmat Houssami.   

Abstract

There is limited evidence on the role of 3D mammography with tomosynthesis in breast screening, although early studies suggest that it may improve specificity. We prospectively evaluated the effect of integrating 3D mammography as a triage to assessment in 158 consecutive recalls to assessment (recalled in standard 2D-mammographic screening) in asymptomatic subjects. Radiologists provided 3D mammography-based opinion as to whether recall/assessment was warranted or unnecessary, and all subjects proceeded to assessment. 3D triage was positive (confirmed the need for assessment) in all 21 subjects with breast cancer (there were no false negatives), and would have avoided recall in 102 of 137 (74.4%) subjects with a negative/benign final outcome in whom 3D triage did not recommend recall. Proportion of true negative 3D triage (as a proxy for potential reduction in recalls) was slightly higher in dense than non-dense breasts, did not differ across age-groups, but was significantly associated with the type of lesion seen on imaging (being highest for distortions, asymmetric densities, and lesions with ill-defined margins). While the simulation design may have over-estimated the potential for 3D mammography triage to reduce recalls, this study clearly demonstrates its capability to improve breast screening specificity and to reduce recall rates. Future studies of 3D mammography should further assess its role as a recall-reducing strategy in screening practice and should include formal cost-analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22270938     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-1959-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  19 in total

1.  Additional findings at preoperative breast MRI: the value of second-look digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Paola Clauser; Luca A Carbonaro; Martina Pancot; Rossano Girometti; Massimo Bazzocchi; Chiara Zuiani; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Secondary prevention at 360°: the important role of diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  Anna Micaela Ciarrapico; Guglielmo Manenti; Chiara Pistolese; Sebastiano Fabiano; Roberto Fiori; Andrea Romagnoli; Gianluigi Sergiacomi; Matteo Stefanini; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Comparative evaluation of average glandular dose and breast cancer detection between single-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view digital mammography (DM) and two-view DM: correlation with breast thickness and density.

Authors:  Sung Ui Shin; Jung Min Chang; Min Sun Bae; Su Hyun Lee; Nariya Cho; Mirinae Seo; Won Hwa Kim; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  [Future of mammography-based imaging].

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; T Wittenberg; T Michel; A Hartmann; M W Beckmann; C Rauh; S M Jud; B Brehm; M Meier-Meitinger; G Anton; M Uder; P A Fasching
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Diagnostic value of the stand-alone synthetic image in digital breast tomosynthesis examinations.

Authors:  Julia Garayoa; Margarita Chevalier; Maria Castillo; Ignacio Mahillo-Fernández; Najim Amallal El Ouahabi; Carmen Estrada; Alejandro Tejerina; Olivia Benitez; Julio Valverde
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Comparison between two-dimensional synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of T1 breast cancer.

Authors:  Ji Soo Choi; Boo-Kyung Han; Eun Young Ko; Eun Sook Ko; Soo Yeon Hahn; Jung Hee Shin; Min Jung Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Clinical implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Emily F Conant
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 8.  Screening for breast cancer in 2018-what should we be doing today?

Authors:  J M Seely; T Alhassan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Comparison of a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system to magnified 2D mammography using breast tissue specimens.

Authors:  Andrew W Tucker; Jabari Calliste; Emily M Gidcumb; Jaclyn Wu; Cherie M Kuzmiak; Noorie Hyun; Donglin Zeng; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou; Yueh Z Lee
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: lessons learned from early clinical implementation.

Authors:  Robyn Gartner Roth; Andrew D A Maidment; Susan P Weinstein; Susan Orel Roth; Emily F Conant
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.