| Literature DB >> 22267192 |
Elizabeth Hernández-Marin1, Andrés Barbosa, Ana Martínez.
Abstract
In this Density Functional Theory study, it became apparent that astaxanthin (ASTA) may form metal ion complexes with metal cations such as Ca⁺², Cu⁺², Pb⁺², Zn⁺², Cd⁺² and Hg⁺². The presence of metal cations induces changes in the maximum absorption bands which are red shifted in all cases. Therefore, in the case of compounds where metal ions are interacting with ASTA, they are redder in color. Moreover, the antiradical capacity of some ASTA-metal cationic complexes was studied by assessing their vertical ionization energy and vertical electron affinity, reaching the conclusion that metal complexes are slightly better electron donors and better electron acceptors than ASTA.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22267192 PMCID: PMC6268172 DOI: 10.3390/molecules17011039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Optimized structures of different isomers of [ASTA-Pb]+2and [ASTA-Pb2]+4, ΔE is the relative energy with respect to the corresponding most stable structure.
Figure 2Optimized structures of [ASTA-Ca]+2, [ASTA-Ca2]+4, [ASTA-Cd2(H2O)2]+2, and [ASTA-Cd2(H2O)4]+4. Schematic representation of ASTA is also included.
UV/vis maximum absorption wavelength, λmax in nm and oscillator strength (f), as well as the correspondent excitation energy (EE in eV) calculated in gas phase and in ethanol for ASTA and the ASTA-metal cationic complexes.
| Chemical Formula | λmax (f)(gas) | EE(gas) | λmax (f)(ethanol) | EE(ethanol) | Exp λmax(ethanol) [ | Exp EE (ethanol) [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASTA | 447 (4) | 2.77 | 471 (4) | 2.63 | 480 | 2.58 |
| [ASTA-Ca]+2 | 651 (4) | 1.90 | 712 (4) | 1.74 | 492 * | 2.52 |
| [ASTA-Ca2]+4 | 603 (5) | 2.06 | 516 (4) | 2.40 | ||
| [ASTA-Zn(H 2O)2]+2 | 642 (4) | 1.93 | 680 (4) | 1.82 | 492 * | 2.52 |
| [ASTA-Zn2(H 2O)4]+4 | 615 (5) | 2.02 | 551 (5) | 2.25 | ||
| [ASTA-Pb]+2 | 605 (4) | 2.05 | 634 (4) | 1.96 | ||
| [ASTA-Pb2]+4 | 673 (5) | 1.84 | 680 (5) | 1.82 | ||
| [ASTA-Cu(H 2O)2]+2 | 817 (4) | 1.52 | 910 (4) | 1.36 | ||
| [ASTA-Cu2(H 2O)4]+4 | 564 (4) | 2.20 | 587 (4) | 2.11 | ||
| [ASTA-Cd(H 2O)2]+2 | 671 (4) | 1.85 | 737 (4) | 1.68 | ||
| [ASTA-Cd2(H 2O)4]+4 | 595 (5) | 2.08 | 515 (5) | 2.41 | ||
| [ASTA-Hg(H 2O)2]+2 | 642 (4) | 1.93 | 682 (4) | 1.82 | ||
| [ASTA-Hg2(H 2O)4]+4 | 601 (5) | 2.06 | 516 (5) | 2.40 |
* Broad shoulder was found at 520–600 nm.
Figure 3Optimized structures of [(ASTA-H)Pb(C2H 5OH)2]+1 and [(ASTA-2H)Pb2(C2H5OH)4]+2.
UV/vis maximum absorption wavelength, λmax, in nm and oscillator strength (f), as well as the correspondent excitation energy (EE in eV) calculated including solvent (ethanol) effect via the PCM model. The optimized metal complexes considered the deprotonation of ASTA to form the metal compound.
| Chemical formula | λmax (f)(ethanol) | EE(ethanol) | Exp λmax(ethanol) [ | Exp EE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASTA | 471 (4) | 2.63 | 480 | 2.58 |
| [(ASTA-H) Ca (C2H 5OH)2]+1 | 514 (4) | 2.41 | 492 * | 2.52 |
| [(ASTA-2H) Ca2 (C2H5OH)4 ]+2 | 500 (5) | 2.48 | ||
| [(ASTA-H) Zn (C2H 5OH)2]+1 | 547 (4) | 2.27 | 492 * | 2.52 |
| [(ASTA-2H) Zn2 (C2H5OH)4]+2 | 531 (5) | 2.33 | ||
| [(ASTA-H) Pb (C2H 5OH)2]+1 | 562 (4) | 2.09 | ||
| [(ASTA-2H) Pb2 (C2H5OH)4]+2 | 548(5) | 2.26 | ||
| [(ASTA-H) Cu (C2H 5OH)2]+1 | 583 (2) | 2.13 | ||
| [(ASTA-2H) Cu2 (C2H5OH)4]+2 | 851 (3) | 1.46 | ||
| [(ASTA-H) Cd (C2H 5OH)2]+1 | 530 (4) | 2.34 | ||
| [(ASTA-2H) Cd2 (C2H5OH)4]+2 | 513 (5) | 2.42 | ||
| [(ASTA-H) Hg (C2H 5OH)2]+1 | 528 (4) | 2.35 | ||
| [(ASTA-2H) Hg2 (C2H5OH)4]+2 | 509 (5) | 2.44 |
* Broad shoulder was found at 520–600 nm.
Energy differences in ethanol (reported in kcal/mol) for the formation of [(ASTA-nH)Mn C2H 5OH)2n]+n complexes.
| (ASTA-H)−1 + M+2 + 2 C2H 5OH → [(ASTA-H)M(C2H 5OH)2]+1 | (ASTA-H)−2 + 2M+2 + 4 C2H 5OH→[(ASTA-2H)M2(C2H5OH)4]+2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ca2 + | −73.2 | Ca2 + | −139.0 |
| Pb2 + | −166.2 | Pb2 + | −336.2 |
| Cu2 + | −239.9 | Cu2 + | −404.9 |
| Zn2 + | −112.4 | Zn2 + | −223.0 |
| Cd2 + | −74.3 | Cd2 + | −144.7 |
| Hg2 + | −47.5 | Hg2 + | −93.8 |
Vertical Ionization Energy (VIE) and Vertical Electron Affinity (VEA) in ethanol, calculated with the LC-wPBE functional.
| Compound | VIE (eV) | VEA (eV) |
|---|---|---|
| ASTA | 4.96 | 3.00 |
| [(ASTA-H)Ca(C2H 5OH)2]+1 | 4.87 | 3.70 |
| [(ASTA-2H)Ca2(C2H5OH)4]+2 | 4.96 | 3.20 |
| [(ASTA-H)Zn(C2H 5OH)2]+1 | 4.86 | 4.06 |
| [(ASTA-2H)Zn2(C2H5OH)4]+2 | 4.97 | 3.36 |