Literature DB >> 22253342

Prostatic cancer surveillance following whole-gland high-intensity focused ultrasound: comparison of MRI and prostate-specific antigen for detection of residual or recurrent disease.

S Punwani1, M Emberton, M Walkden, A Sohaib, A Freeman, H Ahmed, C Allen, A Kirkham.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study compares dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI with the serial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement for detection of residual disease following whole-gland high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy of prostate cancer.
METHODS: Patients in whom post-HIFU DCE-MRI was followed within 3 months by ultrasound-guided transrectal biopsy were selected from a local database. 26 patients met the study inclusion criteria. Serial PSA levels following HIFU and post-HIFU follow-up MRI were retrieved for each patient. Three radiologists unaware of other investigative results independently assessed post-HIFU MRI studies for the presence of cancer, scoring on a four-point scale (1, no disease; 2, probably no disease; 3, probably residual disease; and 4, residual disease). Sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were performed for each reader, post-HIFU PSA nadir and pre-biopsy PSA level thresholds of >0.2 and >0.5 ng ml(-1).
RESULTS: The sensitivity of DCE-MRI for detection of residual disease for the three readers ranged between 73% and 87%, and the specificity between 73% and 82%. There was good agreement between readers (κ = 0.69-0.77). The sensitivity and specificity of PSA thresholds was 60-87% and 73-100%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve was greatest for pre-biopsy PSA (0.95).
CONCLUSION: DCE-MRI performed following whole-gland HIFU has similar sensitivity and specificity and ROC performance to serial PSA measurements for detection of residual or recurrent disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22253342      PMCID: PMC3474121          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/61380797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  18 in total

Review 1.  Principles and results of high-intensity focused ultrasound for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Colombel; A Gelet
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.554

2.  Focal therapy for prostate cancer is a reasonable treatment option in properly selected patients.

Authors:  Thomas J Polascik; Vladimir Mouraviev
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Quality of life following high-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Sunao Shoji; Mayura Nakano; Yoshihiro Nagata; Yukio Usui; Toshiro Terachi; Toyoaki Uchida
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 3.369

4.  Salvage radiotherapy after high-intensity focussed ultrasound for recurrent localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Julien Riviere; Jean-Christophe Bernhard; Grégoire Robert; Hervé Wallerand; Edouard Deti; Sylvie Maurice-Tison; Jean-Michel Ardiet; Jean-Philippe Maire; Pierre Richaud; Jean-Marie Ferriere; Philippe Ballanger; Albert Gelet; Gilles Pasticier
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  To what extent does the prostate-specific antigen nadir predict subsequent treatment failure after transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy for presumed localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate?

Authors:  Toyoaki Uchida; Rowland O Illing; Paul J Cathcart; Mark Emberton
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop?

Authors:  B Djavan; V Ravery; A Zlotta; P Dobronski; M Dobrovits; M Fakhari; C Seitz; M Susani; A Borkowski; L Boccon-Gibod; C C Schulman; M Marberger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Dynamic contrast enhanced, pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging of localized prostate cancer for predicting tumor volume: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings.

Authors:  Arnauld Villers; Philippe Puech; Damien Mouton; Xavier Leroy; Charles Ballereau; Laurent Lemaitre
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: 5-year experience.

Authors:  Andreas Blana; Bernhard Walter; Sebastian Rogenhofer; Wolf F Wieland
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  High-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: comparative definitions of biochemical failure.

Authors:  Andreas Blana; Stephen C W Brown; Christian Chaussy; Giario N Conti; James A Eastham; Roman Ganzer; Francois J Murat; Gilles Pasticier; Xavier Rebillard; John C Rewcastle; Cary N Robertson; Stefan Thuroff; John F Ward
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Armando Stabile; Francesco Giganti; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Samir S Taneja; Geert Villeirs; Inderbir S Gill; Clare Allen; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore; Veeru Kasivisvanathan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Imaging modalities in focal therapy: patient selection, treatment guidance, and follow-up.

Authors:  Berrend G Muller; Willemien van den Bos; Peter A Pinto; Jean J de la Rosette
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 3.  Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer in the era of routine multi-parametric MRI.

Authors:  M J Connor; M A Gorin; H U Ahmed; R Nigam
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.554

4.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in focal therapy for prostate cancer: recommendations from a consensus panel.

Authors:  Berrend G Muller; Jurgen J Fütterer; Rajan T Gupta; Aaron Katz; Alexander Kirkham; John Kurhanewicz; Judd W Moul; Peter A Pinto; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Cary Robertson; Jean de la Rosette; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; J Stephen Jones; Osamu Ukimura; Sadhna Verma; Hessel Wijkstra; Michael Marberger
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Multiparametric MRI for Suspected Recurrent Prostate Cancer after HIFU:Is DCE still needed?

Authors:  Raïssa Lotte; Alexandre Lafourcade; Pierre Mozer; Pierre Conort; Eric Barret; Eva Comperat; Malek Ezziane; Paul-Hugo Jouve de Guibert; Sebastian Tavolaro; Lisa Belin; Franck Boudghene; Olivier Lucidarme; Raphaële Renard-Penna
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate with high spatiotemporal resolution using compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and continuous golden-angle radial sampling: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Christian Geppert; Robert Grimm; Tobias K Block; Christian Glielmi; Li Feng; Ricardo Otazo; Justin M Ream; Melanie Moccaldi Romolo; Samir S Taneja; Daniel K Sodickson; Hersh Chandarana
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the management and diagnosis of prostate cancer: current applications and strategies.

Authors:  Daniel J Lee; Hashim U Ahmed; Caroline M Moore; Mark Emberton; Behfar Ehdaie
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Focal therapy for localised unifocal and multifocal prostate cancer: a prospective development study.

Authors:  Hashim U Ahmed; Richard G Hindley; Louise Dickinson; Alex Freeman; Alex P Kirkham; Mahua Sahu; Rebecca Scott; Clare Allen; Jan Van der Meulen; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 9.  Histological outcomes after focal high-intensity focused ultrasound and cryotherapy.

Authors:  Taimur T Shah; Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Charles Jameson; Alex Freeman; Mark Emberton; Hashim U Ahmed
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Ultrasonic enhancement of drug penetration in solid tumors.

Authors:  Chun-Yen Lai; Brett Z Fite; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.