Literature DB >> 19388986

High-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: comparative definitions of biochemical failure.

Andreas Blana1, Stephen C W Brown, Christian Chaussy, Giario N Conti, James A Eastham, Roman Ganzer, Francois J Murat, Gilles Pasticier, Xavier Rebillard, John C Rewcastle, Cary N Robertson, Stefan Thuroff, John F Ward.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the specificity and sensitivity of different definitions of biochemical failure in patients treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for prostate cancer, to identify the most accurate predictor of clinical failure after HIFU. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutively treated patients who underwent HIFU between October 1997 and July 2006 at two centres (Lyon, France; and Regensburg, Germany) were prospectively maintained within a central database and retrospectively reviewed for this study. Clinical failure was defined as a positive prostate biopsy after treatment, radiographic evidence of lymphatic or bony metastatic disease, or salvage treatment for prostate cancer (surgery, radiation, hormonal therapy or second HIFU). The serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values after HIFU were assessed as a biochemical surrogate of a therapeutic success or failure. PSA threshold values, 'PSA nadir plus', PSA velocity, PSA doubling time and the American Society or Therapeutic Radiotherapy and Oncology and Phoenix definition of biochemical failure were all considered. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of each biochemical definition for predicting clinical failure were determined.
RESULTS: The data from 285 patients (stage <or= T2, PSA <15 ng/mL, Gleason score <or=7) were analysed. The median (range) follow-up was 4.7 (2-10.9) years. The median PSA nadir was 0.13 ng/mL, which occurred at a median of 12.9 weeks after HIFU, and the median PSA at the last follow-up was 0.76 (1.6-2.7) ng/mL. Clinical failure occurred in 71 patients (25%); 24 due to a positive biopsy and 47 through the use of an additional therapy. Biochemical events that best predicted clinical failure were 'PSA nadir plus' values of 1.1-1.3 ng/mL, PSA velocities of <0.3 ng/mL/year and PSA doubling times of 1.25-1.75 years.
CONCLUSION: A new definition of biochemical failure that is specific to patients treated with HIFU therapy is established, i.e. the 'Stuttgart definition', the 'PSA nadir plus 1.2 ng/mL'.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19388986     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08518.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  33 in total

1.  HIFU: Definitely ready for prime time.

Authors:  Jack Barkin
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  HIFU ablation is not a proven standard treatment for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alan I So
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Prostate cancer: Defining biochemical failure in patients treated with HIFU.

Authors:  May Abdel-Wahab; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Robotic high-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: what have we learned in 15 years of clinical use?

Authors:  Christian G Chaussy; Stefan F Thüroff
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Current role of salvage robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  D Wetherell; D Bolton; L Kavanagh; M Perera
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Long-term outcomes of partial prostate treatment with magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for patients with favorable-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Martin T King; Paul L Nguyen; Ninjin Boldbaatar; Clare M Tempany; Robert A Cormack; Clair J Beard; Mark D Hurwitz; W Warren Suh; Anthony V D'Amico; Peter F Orio
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Salvage radiotherapy after high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for localized prostate cancer: feasibility, tolerance and efficacy.

Authors:  Thomas Ripert; Younes Bayoud; Rabah Messaoudi; Johann Ménard; Marie-Dominique Azémar; François Duval; Tan Dat Nguyen; Frédéric Staerman
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  [High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) : Importance in the treatment of prostate cancer].

Authors:  R Ganzer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 9.  Imaging of prostate cancer local recurrences: why and how?

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Thierry Vitry; Denis Lyonnet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  "Super-active surveillance": MRI ultrasound fusion biopsy and ablation for less invasive management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan B Bloom; Samuel A Gold; Graham R Hale; Kareem N Rayn; Vikram K Sabarwal; Ivane Bakhutashvili; Vladimir Valera; Baris Turkbey; Peter A Pinto; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.