Literature DB >> 22241591

Evaluation of a method for projection-based tissue-activity estimation within small volumes of interest.

Sudeepti Southekal1, Sarah J McQuaid, Marie Foley Kijewski, Stephen C Moore.   

Abstract

A new method of compensating for tissue-fraction and count-spillover effects, which require tissue segmentation only within a small volume surrounding the primary lesion of interest, was evaluated for SPECT imaging. Tissue-activity concentration estimates are obtained by fitting the measured projection data to a statistical model of the segmented tissue projections. Multiple realizations of two simulated human-torso phantoms, each containing 20 spherical 'tumours', 1.6 cm in diameter, with tumour-to-background ratios of 8:1 and 4:1, were simulated. Estimates of tumour- and background-activity concentration values for homogeneous as well as inhomogeneous tissue activities were compared to the standard uptake value (SUV) metrics on the basis of accuracy and precision. For perfectly registered, high-contrast, superficial lesions in a homogeneous background without scatter, the method yielded accurate (<0.4% bias) and precise (<6.1%) recovery of the simulated activity values, significantly outperforming the SUV metrics. Tissue inhomogeneities, greater tumour depth and lower contrast ratios degraded precision (up to 11.7%), but the estimates remained almost unbiased. The method was comparable in accuracy but more precise than a well-established matrix inversion approach, even when errors in tumour size and position were introduced to simulate moderate inaccuracies in segmentation and image registration. Photon scatter in the object did not significantly affect the accuracy or precision of the estimates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22241591      PMCID: PMC3741654          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/3/685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  39 in total

1.  Recovery correction for quantitation in emission tomography: a feasibility study.

Authors:  L Geworski; B O Knoop; M L de Cabrejas; W H Knapp; D L Munz
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-02

Review 2.  Software for image registration: algorithms, accuracy, efficacy.

Authors:  Brian F Hutton; Michael Braun
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  Breast imaging with fluorine-18-FDG PET: quantitative image analysis.

Authors:  N Avril; S Bense; S I Ziegler; J Dose; W Weber; C Laubenbacher; W Römer; F Jänicke; M Schwaiger
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Partial volume effect compensation for quantitative brain SPECT imaging.

Authors:  Yong Du; Benjamin M W Tsui; Eric C Frey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Development and validation of a Monte Carlo simulation of photon transport in an Anger camera.

Authors:  D J De Vries; S C Moore; R E Zimmerman; S P Mueller; B Friedland; R C Lanza
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Positron emission tomography metabolic data corrected for cortical atrophy using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  C Labbé; J C Froment; A Kennedy; J Ashburner; L Cinotti
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.703

7.  The convergence of object dependent resolution in maximum likelihood based tomographic image reconstruction.

Authors:  J S Liow; S C Strother
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  FDG PET/CT patterns of treatment failure of malignant pleural mesothelioma: relationship to histologic type, treatment algorithm, and survival.

Authors:  Victor H Gerbaudo; Marcelo Mamede; Beatrice Trotman-Dickenson; Hiroto Hatabu; David J Sugarbaker
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Measurement of mesothelioma on thoracic CT scans: a comparison of manual and computer-assisted techniques.

Authors:  Samuel G Armato; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Heber MacMahon; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Hedy L Kindler; Masha Kocherginsky; Adam Starkey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard; Nanda C Krak; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  5 in total

1.  AI-based applications in hybrid imaging: how to build smart and truly multi-parametric decision models for radiomics.

Authors:  Isabella Castiglioni; Francesca Gallivanone; Paolo Soda; Michele Avanzo; Joseph Stancanello; Marco Aiello; Matteo Interlenghi; Marco Salvatore
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Improved quantification for local regions of interest in preclinical PET imaging.

Authors:  J Cal-González; S C Moore; M-A Park; J L Herraiz; J J Vaquero; M Desco; J M Udias
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Comparison of the scanning linear estimator (SLE) and ROI methods for quantitative SPECT imaging.

Authors:  Arda Könik; Meredith Kupinski; P Hendrik Pretorius; Michael A King; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Region-Based Partial Volume Correction Techniques for PET Imaging: Sinogram Implementation and Robustness.

Authors:  Mike Sattarivand; Jennifer Armstrong; Gregory M Szilagyi; Maggie Kusano; Ian Poon; Curtis Caldwell
Journal:  Int J Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-12-17

5.  Partial volume correction for improved PET quantification in 18F-NaF imaging of atherosclerotic plaques.

Authors:  Jacobo Cal-Gonzalez; Xiang Li; Daniel Heber; Ivo Rausch; Stephen C Moore; Klaus Schäfers; Marcus Hacker; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 5.952

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.