Literature DB >> 26334312

Improved quantification for local regions of interest in preclinical PET imaging.

J Cal-González1, S C Moore, M-A Park, J L Herraiz, J J Vaquero, M Desco, J M Udias.   

Abstract

In Positron Emission Tomography, there are several causes of quantitative inaccuracy, such as partial volume or spillover effects. The impact of these effects is greater when using radionuclides that have a large positron range, e.g. (68)Ga and (124)I, which have been increasingly used in the clinic. We have implemented and evaluated a local projection algorithm (LPA), originally evaluated for SPECT, to compensate for both partial-volume and spillover effects in PET. This method is based on the use of a high-resolution CT or MR image, co-registered with a PET image, which permits a high-resolution segmentation of a few tissues within a volume of interest (VOI) centered on a region within which tissue-activity values need to be estimated. The additional boundary information is used to obtain improved activity estimates for each tissue within the VOI, by solving a simple inversion problem. We implemented this algorithm for the preclinical Argus PET/CT scanner and assessed its performance using the radionuclides (18)F, (68)Ga and (124)I. We also evaluated and compared the results obtained when it was applied during the iterative reconstruction, as well as after the reconstruction as a postprocessing procedure. In addition, we studied how LPA can help to reduce the 'spillover contamination', which causes inaccurate quantification of lesions in the immediate neighborhood of large, 'hot' sources. Quantification was significantly improved by using LPA, which provided more accurate ratios of lesion-to-background activity concentration for hot and cold regions. For (18)F, the contrast was improved from 3.0 to 4.0 in hot lesions (when the true ratio was 4.0) and from 0.16 to 0.06 in cold lesions (true ratio  =  0.0), when using the LPA postprocessing. Furthermore, activity values estimated within the VOI using LPA during reconstruction were slightly more accurate than those obtained by post-processing, while also visually improving the image contrast and uniformity within the VOI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26334312      PMCID: PMC4593622          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/18/7127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  35 in total

1.  PET quantitation and imaging of the non-pure positron-emitting iodine isotope 124I.

Authors:  H Herzog; L Tellman; S M Qaim; S Spellerberg; A Schmid; H H Coenen
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Partial volume effect compensation for quantitative brain SPECT imaging.

Authors:  Yong Du; Benjamin M W Tsui; Eric C Frey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 3.  Image quality with non-standard nuclides in PET.

Authors:  R Laforest; X Liu
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 2.346

4.  PeneloPET, a Monte Carlo PET simulation tool based on PENELOPE: features and validation.

Authors:  S España; J L Herraiz; E Vicente; J J Vaquero; M Desco; J M Udias
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  P E Kinahan; D W Townsend; T Beyer; D Sashin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Calculation of positron range and its effect on the fundamental limit of positron emission tomography system spatial resolution.

Authors:  C S Levin; E J Hoffman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Performance evaluation of the GE healthcare eXplore VISTA dual-ring small-animal PET scanner.

Authors:  Yuchuan Wang; Jurgen Seidel; Benjamin M W Tsui; Juan J Vaquero; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Partial-volume correction in PET: validation of an iterative postreconstruction method with phantom and patient data.

Authors:  Boon-Keng Teo; Youngho Seo; Stephen L Bacharach; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Steven K Libutti; Himanshu Shukla; Bruce H Hasegawa; Randall A Hawkins; Benjamin L Franc
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Anatomical-based FDG-PET reconstruction for the detection of hypo-metabolic regions in epilepsy.

Authors:  Kristof Baete; Johan Nuyts; Wim Van Paesschen; Paul Suetens; Patrick Dupont
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Invalidity of SUV Measurements of Lesions in Close Proximity to Hot Sources due to "Shine-Through" Effect on FDG PET-CT Interpretation.

Authors:  Yiyan Liu
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-10-14
View more
  4 in total

1.  Noise suppressed partial volume correction for cardiac SPECT/CT.

Authors:  Chung Chan; Hui Liu; Yariv Grobshtein; Mitchel R Stacy; Albert J Sinusas; Chi Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Vulnerable plaque imaging using 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Jacek Kwiecinski; Piotr J Slomka; Marc R Dweck; David E Newby; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Partial volume correction for improved PET quantification in 18F-NaF imaging of atherosclerotic plaques.

Authors:  Jacobo Cal-Gonzalez; Xiang Li; Daniel Heber; Ivo Rausch; Stephen C Moore; Klaus Schäfers; Marcus Hacker; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Accuracy of PET quantification in [68Ga]Ga-pentixafor PET/MR imaging of carotid plaques.

Authors:  Ivo Rausch; Dietrich Beitzke; Xiang Li; Sahra Pfaff; Sazan Rasul; Alexander R Haug; Marius E Mayerhoefer; Marcus Hacker; Thomas Beyer; Jacobo Cal-González
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 5.952

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.