Literature DB >> 12931320

Software for image registration: algorithms, accuracy, efficacy.

Brian F Hutton1, Michael Braun.   

Abstract

Image registration is finding increased clinical use both in aiding diagnosis and guiding therapy. There are numerous algorithms for registration, which all involve maximizing a measure of similarity between a transformed floating image and a fixed reference image. The choice of the similarity measure depends, to some extent, on the application. Methods based on the use of the joint intensity histogram have become popular because of their flexibility and robustness. A distinction is made between rigid-body and non-rigid transformations. The latter are needed for inter-subject registration or intra-subject registration in cases where the region of the body of interest is not considered rigid. Non-rigid transformation is normally achieved using a global model of the deformation but can also be defined by a set of locally rigid transformations, each constrained to a small block in the image. There is scope for further research on the incorporation of appropriate constraints, especially for the application of non-rigid transformations to nuclear medicine studies. Most of the initial practical concerns regarding image registration have been overcome and there is increasing availability of commercial software. There are several approaches to the validation of registration software, with validation of non-rigid algorithms being particularly difficult. Studies have demonstrated the accuracy on the order of half a pixel for both intra- and inter-modality registration (typically 2 to 3 mm). Although hardware-based registration has now become possible by using dual-modality instruments, software-based registration will continue to play an important role in nuclear medicine. Copyright 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12931320     DOI: 10.1053/snuc.2003.127309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  20 in total

1.  [Combined Scanners (PET/CT, SPECT/CT) Versus Multimodality Imaging with Separated Systems].

Authors:  T Pfluger; C la Fougère; J Stauss; R Santos; C Vollmar; K Hahn
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Automated registration of hip and spine for longitudinal QCT studies: integration with 3D densitometric and structural analysis.

Authors:  Wenjun Li; Miki Sode; Isra Saeed; Thomas Lang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Review of functional/anatomical imaging in oncology.

Authors:  Stephanie N Histed; Maria L Lindenberg; Esther Mena; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Karen A Kurdziel
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.690

4.  Update of PET and PET/CT for hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies.

Authors:  Dominique Delbeke; William H Martin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 5.  Multimodality image registration with software: state-of-the-art.

Authors:  Piotr J Slomka; Richard P Baum
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  New technique for real-time interface pressure analysis: getting more out of large image data sets.

Authors:  Kath Bogie; Xiaofeng Wang; Baowei Fei; Jiayang Sun
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

7.  Dual-isotope acquisition for CT-SPECT registration of infection studies.

Authors:  Lisa Tang; Ghassan Hamarneh; Anna Celler
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Evaluation of a method for projection-based tissue-activity estimation within small volumes of interest.

Authors:  Sudeepti Southekal; Sarah J McQuaid; Marie Foley Kijewski; Stephen C Moore
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Comparison of fMRI coregistration results between human experts and software solutions in patients and healthy subjects.

Authors:  Andreas Gartus; Alexander Geissler; Thomas Foki; Amir Reza Tahamtan; Gerald Pahs; Markus Barth; Katja Pinker; Siegfried Trattnig; Roland Beisteiner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Role of PET/CT in the detection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Orlacchio; O Schillaci; N Fusco; P Broccoli; M Maurici; M Yamgoue; R Danieli; S D'Urso; G Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.