Literature DB >> 10755721

Recovery correction for quantitation in emission tomography: a feasibility study.

L Geworski1, B O Knoop, M L de Cabrejas, W H Knapp, D L Munz.   

Abstract

In emission tomography, the spread of regional tracer uptake to surrounding areas caused by limited spatial resolution of the tomograph must be taken into account when quantitating activity concentrations in vivo. Assuming linearity and stationarity, the relationship between imaged activity concentration and true activity concentration is only dependent on the geometric relationship between the limited spatial resolution of the tomograph in all three dimensions and the three-dimensional size and shape of the object. In particular it is independent of the type of object studied. This concept is characterized by the term "recovery coefficient". Recovery effects can be corrected for by recovery coefficients determined in a calibration measurement for lesions of simple geometrical shape. This method works on anatomical structures that can be approximated to simple geometrical objects. The aim of this study was to investigate whether recovery correction of appropriate structures is feasible in a clinical setting. Measurements were done on a positron emission tomography (PET) scanner in the 2D and 3D acquisition mode and on an analogue and digital single-photon emission tomography (SPET) system using commercially available software for image reconstruction and correction of absorption and scatter effects. The results of hot spot and cold spot phantom measurements were compared to validate the assumed conditions of linearity and stationarity. It can be concluded that a recovery correction is feasible for PET scanners down to lesions measuring about 1.5xFWHM in size, whereas with simple correction schemes, which are widely available, an object-independent recovery correction for SPET cannot be performed. This result can be attributed to imperfections in the commercially available methods for attenuation and scatter correction in SPET, which are only approximate.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10755721     DOI: 10.1007/s002590050022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  35 in total

1.  Proposal for the standardisation of multi-centre trials in nuclear medicine imaging: prerequisites for a European 123I-FP-CIT SPECT database.

Authors:  John Caddell Dickson; Livia Tossici-Bolt; Terez Sera; Robin de Nijs; Jan Booij; Maria Claudia Bagnara; Anita Seese; Pierre Malick Koulibaly; Umit Ozgur Akdemir; Cathrine Jonsson; Michel Koole; Maria Raith; Markus Nowak Lonsdale; Jean George; Felicia Zito; Klaus Tatsch
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Cross-camera comparison of SPECT measurements of a 3-D anthropomorphic basal ganglia phantom.

Authors:  Walter Koch; Perry E Radau; Wolfgang Münzing; Klaus Tatsch
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Partial-volume effect correction in positron emission tomography brain scan image using super-resolution image reconstruction.

Authors:  T Meechai; S Tepmongkol; C Pluempitiwiriyawej
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Quantitative simultaneous positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jinsong Ouyang; Yoann Petibon; Chuan Huang; Timothy G Reese; Aleksandra L Kolnick; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-11-03

5.  Improved mapping and quantification of serotonin transporter availability in the human brainstem with the HRRT.

Authors:  Martin Schain; Miklós Tóth; Zsolt Cselényi; Ryosuke Arakawa; Christer Halldin; Lars Farde; Andrea Varrone
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Accuracy and precision of radioactivity quantification in nuclear medicine images.

Authors:  Eric C Frey; John L Humm; Michael Ljungberg
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 7.  A review on segmentation of positron emission tomography images.

Authors:  Brent Foster; Ulas Bagci; Awais Mansoor; Ziyue Xu; Daniel J Mollura
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 4.589

8.  Kidney stone volume estimation from computerized tomography images using a model based method of correcting for the point spread function.

Authors:  Xinhui Duan; Jia Wang; Mingliang Qu; Shuai Leng; Yu Liu; Amy Krambeck; Cynthia McCollough
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Absolute quantification in SPECT.

Authors:  Philipp Ritt; Hans Vija; Joachim Hornegger; Torsten Kuwert
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Partial volume correction strategies for quantitative FDG PET in oncology.

Authors:  Nikie J Hoetjes; Floris H P van Velden; Otto S Hoekstra; Corneline J Hoekstra; Nanda C Krak; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.