Literature DB >> 22237908

Prey community structure affects how predators select for Mullerian mimicry.

Eira Ihalainen1, Hannah M Rowland, Michael P Speed, Graeme D Ruxton, Johanna Mappes.   

Abstract

Müllerian mimicry describes the close resemblance between aposematic prey species; it is thought to be beneficial because sharing a warning signal decreases the mortality caused by sampling by inexperienced predators learning to avoid the signal. It has been hypothesized that selection for mimicry is strongest in multi-species prey communities where predators are more prone to misidentify the prey than in simple communities. In this study, wild great tits (Parus major) foraged from either simple (few prey appearances) or complex (several prey appearances) artificial prey communities where a specific model prey was always present. Owing to slower learning, the model did suffer higher mortality in complex communities when the birds were inexperienced. However, in a subsequent generalization test to potential mimics of the model prey (a continuum of signal accuracy), only birds that had foraged from simple communities selected against inaccurate mimics. Therefore, accurate mimicry is more likely to evolve in simple communities even though predator avoidance learning is slower in complex communities. For mimicry to evolve, prey species must have a common predator; the effective community consists of the predator's diet. In diverse environments, the limited diets of specialist predators could create 'simple community pockets' where accurate mimicry is selected for.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22237908      PMCID: PMC3321702          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.2360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  21 in total

1.  The relationship between mimetic imperfection and phenotypic variation in insect colour patterns.

Authors:  Graham Holloway; Francis Gilbert; Amoret Brandt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The effect of alternative prey on the dynamics of imperfect Batesian and Müllerian mimicries.

Authors:  Leena Lindström; Rauno V Alatalo; Anne Lyytinen; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  The evolution of müllerian mimicry in multispecies communities.

Authors:  Christopher D Beatty; Kirsten Beirinckx; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Natural selection on unpalatable species imposed by state-dependent foraging behaviour.

Authors:  Thomas N Sherratt; Michael P Speed; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Müllerian mimicry: an examination of Fisher's theory of gradual evolutionary change.

Authors:  Alexandra C V Balogh; Olof Leimar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The evolution of multicomponent mimicry.

Authors:  Daniel W Franks; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Generalization of color by chickens: experimental observations and a Bayesian model.

Authors:  R J Baddeley; D Osorio; C D Jones
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  A Müllerian mimicry ring in Appalachian millipedes.

Authors:  Paul E Marek; Jason E Bond
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The population genetics of mimetic diversity in Heliconius butterflies.

Authors:  Marcus R Kronforst; Lawrence E Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Three-butterfly system provides a field test of müllerian mimicry.

Authors:  D D Kapan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  13 in total

1.  How do predators generalize warning signals in simple and complex prey communities? Insights from a videogame.

Authors:  Mónica Arias; John W Davey; Simon Martin; Chris Jiggins; Nicola Nadeau; Mathieu Joron; Violaine Llaurens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Food web persistence is enhanced by non-trophic interactions.

Authors:  Edd Hammill; Pavel Kratina; Matthijs Vos; Owen L Petchey; Bradley R Anholt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  The perfection of mimicry: an information approach.

Authors:  Thomas N Sherratt; Casey A Peet-Paré
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  The current and future state of animal coloration research.

Authors:  John A Endler; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  The gut microbiome as a driver of individual variation in cognition and functional behaviour.

Authors:  Gabrielle L Davidson; Amy C Cooke; Crystal N Johnson; John L Quinn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Unsupervised machine learning reveals mimicry complexes in bumblebees occur along a perceptual continuum.

Authors:  Briana D Ezray; Drew C Wham; Carrie E Hill; Heather M Hines
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Effect of maternal predator exposure on the ability of stickleback offspring to generalize a learned colour-reward association.

Authors:  Sally Feng; Katie E McGhee; Alison M Bell
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Frequency dependence shapes the adaptive landscape of imperfect Batesian mimicry.

Authors:  Susan D Finkbeiner; Patricio A Salazar; Sofía Nogales; Cassidi E Rush; Adriana D Briscoe; Ryan I Hill; Marcus R Kronforst; Keith R Willmott; Sean P Mullen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Hard to catch: experimental evidence supports evasive mimicry.

Authors:  Erika Páez; Janne K Valkonen; Keith R Willmott; Pável Matos-Maraví; Marianne Elias; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Ecological and evolutionary processes drive the origin and maintenance of imperfect mimicry.

Authors:  Joseph S Wilson; Joshua P Jahner; Kevin A Williams; Matthew L Forister
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.