Literature DB >> 19487663

A Müllerian mimicry ring in Appalachian millipedes.

Paul E Marek1, Jason E Bond.   

Abstract

Few biological phenomena provide such an elegant and straightforward example of evolution by natural selection as color mimicry among unrelated organisms. By mimicking the appearance of a heavily defended aposematic species, members of a second species gain protection from predators and, potentially, enhanced fitness. Mimicking a preexisting warning advertisement is economical because a potentially costly novel one can be avoided; simultaneously, the addition of more aposematic individuals enhances the overall warning effect. The better-known mimetic systems comprise tropical taxa, but here, we show a remarkable example of color mimicry in 7 species of blind, cyanide-generating millipedes endemic to the Appalachian Mountains of temperate North America. Because these millipedes lack eyes, there is no sexual selection or intraspecific signaling for coloration, providing an ideal system for mimicry studies. We document a Müllerian symbiosis where unrelated species vary in color and pattern over geographical space but appear identical where they co-occur. By using spectral color data, estimations of evolutionary history, and detailed field observations of species abundance, we test 4 predictions of Müllerian mimicry theory and begin to unravel the story of an elaborate mimetic diversification in the forests of Appalachia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19487663      PMCID: PMC2700981          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810408106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  12 in total

1.  The evolution of a Müllerian mimic in a spatially distributed community.

Authors:  Mathieu Joron; Yoh Iwasa
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  LAMARC 2.0: maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation of population parameters.

Authors:  Mary K Kuhner
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Animal visual systems and the evolution of color patterns: sensory processing illuminates signal evolution.

Authors:  John A Endler; David A Westcott; Joah R Madden; Tim Robson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Predator learning favours mimicry of a less-toxic model in poison frogs.

Authors:  Catherine R Darst; Molly E Cummings
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Cyanogenic Glandular Apparatus of a Millipede.

Authors:  T Eisner; H E Eisner; J J Hurst; F C Kafatos; J Meinwald
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-03-22       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Diversity in mimicry: paradox or paradigm?

Authors:  M Joron; J L Mallet
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-11-01       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Three-butterfly system provides a field test of müllerian mimicry.

Authors:  D D Kapan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Molecular phylogenetic evidence for a mimetic radiation in Peruvian poison frogs supports a Müllerian mimicry hypothesis.

Authors:  R Symula; R Schulte; K Summers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  The shifting balance theory and macroevolution.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 16.830

10.  Separating population structure from population history: a cladistic analysis of the geographical distribution of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in the tiger salamander, Ambystoma tigrinum.

Authors:  A R Templeton; E Routman; C A Phillips
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  23 in total

1.  Evolutionary biology: Catfish mimics.

Authors:  James Mallet; Kanchon Dasmahapatra
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Bioluminescent aposematism in millipedes.

Authors:  Paul Marek; Daniel Papaj; Justin Yeager; Sergio Molina; Wendy Moore
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  A homeotic shift late in development drives mimetic color variation in a bumble bee.

Authors:  Li Tian; Sarthok Rasique Rahman; Briana D Ezray; Luca Franzini; James P Strange; Patrick Lhomme; Heather M Hines
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Repeated evolution in overlapping mimicry rings among North American velvet ants.

Authors:  Joseph S Wilson; Kevin A Williams; Matthew L Forister; Carol D von Dohlen; James P Pitts
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Mimics here and there, but not everywhere: Müllerian mimicry in Ceroglossus ground beetles?

Authors:  Carlos P Muñoz-Ramírez; Pierre-Paul Bitton; Stéphanie M Doucet; Lacey L Knowles
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Unsupervised machine learning reveals mimicry complexes in bumblebees occur along a perceptual continuum.

Authors:  Briana D Ezray; Drew C Wham; Carrie E Hill; Heather M Hines
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Prey community structure affects how predators select for Mullerian mimicry.

Authors:  Eira Ihalainen; Hannah M Rowland; Michael P Speed; Graeme D Ruxton; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Hard to catch: experimental evidence supports evasive mimicry.

Authors:  Erika Páez; Janne K Valkonen; Keith R Willmott; Pável Matos-Maraví; Marianne Elias; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Millipede taxonomy after 250 years: classification and taxonomic practices in a mega-diverse yet understudied arthropod group.

Authors:  Michael S Brewer; Petra Sierwald; Jason E Bond
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ecological and evolutionary processes drive the origin and maintenance of imperfect mimicry.

Authors:  Joseph S Wilson; Joshua P Jahner; Kevin A Williams; Matthew L Forister
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.