Literature DB >> 33715434

Hard to catch: experimental evidence supports evasive mimicry.

Erika Páez1, Janne K Valkonen2, Keith R Willmott3, Pável Matos-Maraví4, Marianne Elias1, Johanna Mappes2,5.   

Abstract

Most research on aposematism has focused on chemically defended prey, but the signalling difficulty of capture remains poorly explored. Similar to classical Batesian and Müllerian mimicry related to distastefulness, such 'evasive aposematism' may also lead to convergence in warning colours, known as evasive mimicry. A prime candidate group for evasive mimicry are Adelpha butterflies, which are agile insects and show remarkable colour pattern convergence. We tested the ability of naive blue tits to learn to avoid and generalize Adelpha wing patterns associated with the difficulty of capture and compared their response to that of birds that learned to associate the same wing patterns with distastefulness. Birds learned to avoid all wing patterns tested and generalized their aversion to other prey to some extent, but learning was faster with evasive prey compared to distasteful prey. Our results on generalization agree with longstanding observations of striking convergence in wing colour patterns among Adelpha species, since, in our experiments, perfect mimics of evasive and distasteful models were always protected during generalization and suffered the lowest attack rate. Moreover, generalization on evasive prey was broader compared to that on distasteful prey. Our results suggest that being hard to catch may deter predators at least as effectively as distastefulness. This study provides empirical evidence for evasive mimicry, a potentially widespread but poorly understood form of morphological convergence driven by predator selection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adelpha; convergence; distastefulness; evasive aposematism; predator learning; prey defence

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33715434      PMCID: PMC7944090          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.3052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  32 in total

1.  Predator mixes and the conspicuousness of aposematic signals.

Authors:  John A Endler; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Rapid diversification and not clade age explains high diversity in neotropical Adelpha butterflies.

Authors:  Sean P Mullen; Wesley K Savage; Niklas Wahlberg; Keith R Willmott
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Beyond magic traits: Multimodal mating cues in Heliconius butterflies.

Authors:  Claire Mérot; Brigitte Frérot; Ene Leppik; Mathieu Joron
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  A Müllerian mimicry ring in Appalachian millipedes.

Authors:  Paul E Marek; Jason E Bond
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Ecological chemistry and the palatability spectrum.

Authors:  L P Brower; W N Ryerson; L L Coppinger; S C Glazier
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Batesian mimicry without distastefulness?

Authors:  D O Gibson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-07-05       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Geographic mosaic of selection by avian predators on hindwing warning colour in a polymorphic aposematic moth.

Authors:  Katja Rönkä; Janne K Valkonen; Ossi Nokelainen; Bibiana Rojas; Swanne Gordon; Emily Burdfield-Steel; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Sensory discrimination and its role in the evolution of Batesian mimicry.

Authors:  C J Duncan; P M Sheppard
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  1965       Impact factor: 1.991

9.  Visual pigments, oil droplets, ocular media and cone photoreceptor distribution in two species of passerine bird: the blue tit (Parus caeruleus L.) and the blackbird (Turdus merula L.).

Authors:  N S Hart; J C Partridge; I C Cuthill; A T Bennett
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Frequency dependence shapes the adaptive landscape of imperfect Batesian mimicry.

Authors:  Susan D Finkbeiner; Patricio A Salazar; Sofía Nogales; Cassidi E Rush; Adriana D Briscoe; Ryan I Hill; Marcus R Kronforst; Keith R Willmott; Sean P Mullen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  5 in total

1.  Evidence of attack deflection suggests adaptive evolution of wing tails in butterflies.

Authors:  Ariane Chotard; Joséphine Ledamoisel; Thierry Decamps; Anthony Herrel; Alexis S Chaine; Violaine Llaurens; Vincent Debat
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  Responsive robotic prey reveal how predators adapt to predictability in escape tactics.

Authors:  Andrew W Szopa-Comley; Christos C Ioannou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Hard to catch: experimental evidence supports evasive mimicry.

Authors:  Erika Páez; Janne K Valkonen; Keith R Willmott; Pável Matos-Maraví; Marianne Elias; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Convergent morphology and divergent phenology promote the coexistence of Morpho butterfly species.

Authors:  Vincent Debat; Violaine Llaurens; Camille Le Roy; Camille Roux; Elisabeth Authier; Hugues Parrinello; Héloïse Bastide
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Motion: enhancing signals and concealing cues.

Authors:  Eunice J Tan; Mark A Elgar
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 2.422

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.