Literature DB >> 29618547

Frequency dependence shapes the adaptive landscape of imperfect Batesian mimicry.

Susan D Finkbeiner1,2, Patricio A Salazar3, Sofía Nogales4, Cassidi E Rush5, Adriana D Briscoe6, Ryan I Hill5, Marcus R Kronforst2, Keith R Willmott3, Sean P Mullen7.   

Abstract

Despite more than a century of biological research on the evolution and maintenance of mimetic signals, the relative frequencies of models and mimics necessary to establish and maintain Batesian mimicry in natural populations remain understudied. Here we investigate the frequency-dependent dynamics of imperfect Batesian mimicry, using predation experiments involving artificial butterfly models. We use two geographically distinct populations of Adelpha butterflies that vary in their relative frequencies of a putatively defended model (Adelpha iphiclus) and Batesian mimic (Adelpha serpa). We found that in Costa Rica, where both species share similar abundances, Batesian mimicry breaks down, and predators more readily attack artificial butterfly models of the presumed mimic, A. serpa By contrast, in Ecuador, where A. iphiclus (model) is significantly more abundant than A. serpa (mimic), both species are equally protected from predation. Our results provide compelling experimental evidence that imperfect Batesian mimicry is frequency-dependent on the relative abundance of models and mimics in natural populations, and contribute to the growing body of evidence that complex dynamics, such as seasonality or the availability of alternative prey, influence the evolution of mimetic traits.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Batesian mimicry; abundance; frequency dependence; predation; seasonality

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29618547      PMCID: PMC5904311          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  34 in total

1.  A comparative analysis of the evolution of imperfect mimicry.

Authors:  Heather D Penney; Christopher Hassall; Jeffrey H Skevington; Kevin R Abbott; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Mimicry on the edge: why do mimics vary in resemblance to their model in different parts of their geographical range?

Authors:  George R Harper; David W Pfennig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Receptor noise as a determinant of colour thresholds.

Authors:  M Vorobyev; D Osorio
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Keeping the band together: evidence for false boundary disruptive coloration in a butterfly.

Authors:  B M Seymoure; A Aiello
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Rapid diversification associated with ecological specialization in Neotropical Adelpha butterflies.

Authors:  Emily R Ebel; Jeffrey M DaCosta; Michael D Sorenson; Ryan I Hill; Adriana D Briscoe; Keith R Willmott; Sean P Mullen
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Disruptive ecological selection on a mating cue.

Authors:  Richard M Merrill; Richard W R Wallbank; Vanessa Bull; Patricio C A Salazar; James Mallet; Martin Stevens; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Sensory discrimination and its role in the evolution of Batesian mimicry.

Authors:  C J Duncan; P M Sheppard
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  1965       Impact factor: 1.991

8.  Bird colour vision: behavioural thresholds reveal receptor noise.

Authors:  Peter Olsson; Olle Lind; Almut Kelber
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  STRONG NATURAL SELECTION IN A WARNING-COLOR HYBRID ZONE.

Authors:  James Mallet; Nicholas H Barton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Co-mimics have a mutualistic relationship despite unequal defences.

Authors:  Hannah M Rowland; Eira Ihalainen; Leena Lindström; Johanna Mappes; Michael P Speed
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  11 in total

1.  Sensory bias and signal detection trade-offs maintain intersexual floral mimicry.

Authors:  Avery L Russell; David W Kikuchi; Noah W Giebink; Daniel R Papaj
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The abundance, biomass, and distribution of ants on Earth.

Authors:  Patrick Schultheiss; Sabine S Nooten; Runxi Wang; Mark K L Wong; François Brassard; Benoit Guénard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  How signalling games explain mimicry at many levels: from viral epidemiology to human sociology.

Authors:  William Casey; Steven E Massey; Bud Mishra
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Hard to catch: experimental evidence supports evasive mimicry.

Authors:  Erika Páez; Janne K Valkonen; Keith R Willmott; Pável Matos-Maraví; Marianne Elias; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Evolutionary fine-tuning of background-matching camouflage among geographical populations in the sandy beach tiger beetle.

Authors:  Nayuta Yamamoto; Teiji Sota
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Mimicry in Cretaceous Bugs.

Authors:  Erik Tihelka; Michael S Engel; Diying Huang; Chenyang Cai
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2020-06-16

7.  Experimental field tests of Batesian mimicry in the swallowtail butterfly Papilio polytes.

Authors:  Daniela H Palmer; Yue Qian Tan; Susan D Finkbeiner; Adriana D Briscoe; Antónia Monteiro; Marcus R Kronforst
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Field evidence for colour mimicry overshadowing morphological mimicry.

Authors:  Alberto Corral-Lopez; Javier Edo Varg; Yiselle P Cano-Cobos; Rafael Losada; Emilio Realpe; David Outomuro
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 5.091

9.  Balanced polymorphisms and their divergence in a Heliconius butterfly.

Authors:  James G Ogilvie; Steven Van Belleghem; Ryan Range; Riccardo Papa; Owen W McMillan; Mathieu Chouteau; Brian A Counterman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  How Signaling Games Explain Mimicry at Many Levels: From Viral Epidemiology to Human Sociology.

Authors:  William Casey; Steven E Massey; Bud Mishra
Journal:  Res Sq       Date:  2020-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.