| Literature DB >> 22235316 |
Cristina Tuni1, Sara Goodacre, Jesper Bechsgaard, Trine Bilde.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Polyandry is widespread throughout the animal kingdom. In the absence of direct benefits of mating with different males, the underlying basis for polyandry is enigmatic because it can carry considerable costs such as elevated exposure to sexual diseases, physical injury or other direct fitness costs. Such costs may be balanced by indirect genetic benefits to the offspring of polyandrous females. We investigated polyandry and patterns of parentage in the spider Stegodyphus lineatus. This species experiences relatively high levels of inbreeding as a result of its spatial population structure, philopatry and limited male mating dispersal. Polyandry may provide an opportunity for post mating inbreeding avoidance that reduces the risk of genetic incompatibilities arising from incestuous matings. However, multiple mating carries direct fitness costs to females suggesting that genetic benefits must be substantial to counter direct costs. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22235316 PMCID: PMC3250463 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029636
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Summary statistics for 5 microsatellite loci including number of individuals analyzed (N), number of alleles (NA), expected (He) and observed (Ho) heterozygosity, allelic richness, estimates of inbreeding coefficient (Fis), and relatedness (R) among offspring and adult females and percentage of full- sib (FS) and half-sib (HS) relationships between pairs of individuals.
| Offspring generation | Parental generation | ||||||||||||
| Site | N | NA (range) | Ho/He | Allelic Richness | F | R (95% C .I.) | %FS | %HS | N | R (95% C .I.) | %FS | %HS | |
| Israel | SB | 7 | 1–4 | 0.32/0.61 | 2.6 | 0.48 | 0.17 (0.08;0.25) | 14 | 24 | 5 | 0.11 (0.03;0.17) | 20 | |
| L | 3 | 1–5 | - | - | - | 0.38 (0.31;0.44) | 67 | 33 | 3 | ||||
| Greece | S1 | 12 | 1–3 | 0.26/0.28 | 1.65 | 0.08 | 0.22 (0.15;0.28) | 37 | 63 | 10 | 0.28 (0.17;0.39) | 35 | 13 |
| S2 | 15 | 1–3 | 0.15/0.26 | 1.58 | 0.46 | 0.25 (0.19;0.30) | 42 | 4 | 9 | 0.26 (0.20;0.32) | 38 | 4 | |
| S3 | 7 | 1–3 | 0.26/0.32 | 1.79 | 0.17 | 0.19 (0.09;0.29) | 28.5 | 6 | 0.22 (0.03;0.4) | 27 | |||
| S4 | 6 | 1–2 | 0.23/0.26 | 1.65 | 0.46 | 0.22 (0.02;0.43) | 20 | 13 | 4 | 0.38 (0.09;0.66) | 30 | 10 | |
*denotes a significant deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P<0.05).
Figure 1Multiple parentage in broods from the Israel population.
Summary of results for number of fathers estimated by allele count, GERUD 2.0 and PARENTAGE 1.0 for the Israeli population (broods from site L- and Site SB-).
Figure 2Multiple parentage in broods from the Greek island population.
Summary of results for number of fathers estimated by allele count, GERUD 2.0 and PARENTAGE 1.0 for the Greek population: a) broods from Site 1); b) broods from Site 2; c) broods from Site 3; and d) broods from Site 4.
Summary of results from different methods (allele count; GERUD 2.0; PARENTAGE 1.0) for estimating the number of sires and paternity skew for S. lineatus wild-caught clutches from the Israeli and the Greek population.
| ALLELE COUNT | GERUD 2.0 | PARENTAGE 1.0 | ||||||||||
| Nest (# offspring) | # loci used | # paternal alleles | Min. # fathers | # offspring | # loci used | Min. # fathers | Father solutions | Mean # fathers | Proportion of iterations | Mode(p) | ||
| Israel Sites | L | 1(13) | 2 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 2.45 | →0.01 | 2 (0.66) |
| 2(14) | 1 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 17 | 1.10 | 0.90 | 1 (0.90) | ||
| 3(14) | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 3.06 | →0.07 | 3 (0.48) | ||
| SB | 1(14) | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 2.02 | →0 | 2 (0.98) | |
| 2(11) | 5 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | 1 | 1 (1) | ||
| 3(17) | 3 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.78 | →0.28 | 2 (0.67) | ||
| 4(41) | - | - | - | 37 | 4 | 1 | 24 | 1.55 | 0.68 | 1 (0.68) | ||
| 5(64) | - | - | - | 49 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2.32 | →0 | 2 (0.69) | ||
| 6(29) | 1 | 3 | 2 | 26 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 2.02 | →0.07 | 2 (0.84) | ||
| 7(33) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 1.00 | 1 | 1 (1) | ||
| Greek Island Sites | S1 | 1 (14) | - | - | - | 14 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 1.21 | 0.82 | 1 (0.82) |
| 2(34) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 34 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.17 | 0.84 | 1 (0.84) | ||
| 3(12) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | 1 | 1 (1) | ||
| 4(60) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 60 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3.49 | →0 | 3 (0.52) | ||
| 5(15) | 3 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.27 | 0.80 | 1 (0.80) | ||
| 6(83) | 1 | 2 | 1 | 83 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.05 | 0.95 | 1 (0.95) | ||
| 7(34) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 34 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.12 | 0.89 | 1 (0.89) | ||
| 8(23) | 3 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2.06 | →0.22 | 2 (0.56) | ||
| 9(9) | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2.13 | →0.29 | 2 (0.44) | ||
| 10(34) | 1 | 2 | 1 | 34 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.07 | 0.93 | 1 (0.93) | ||
| 11(10) | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1.13 | 0.89 | 1 (0.89) | ||
| 12(7) | - | - | - | 7 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 2.13 | →0.39 | 1 (0.39) | ||
| S2 | 1(11) | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.21 | 0.85 | 1 (0.85) | |
| 2(28) | 3 | 2 | 1 | 28 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2.55 | →0.07 | 2 (0.55) | ||
| 3(20) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2.56 | →0.27 | 1 (0.27) | ||
| 4(6) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.14 | 0.89 | 1 (0.89) | ||
| 5(9) | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2.64 | →0.19 | 2 (0.36) | ||
| 6(28) | 3 | 2 | 1 | 22 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.63 | 0.64 | 1 (0.64) | ||
| 7(8) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 17 | 1.34 | 0.76 | 1 (0.76) | ||
| 8(15) | 1 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.53 | →0.50 | 1(0.50) | ||
| 9(12) | 4 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.02 | 0.97 | 1(0.97) | ||
| 10(28) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.15 | 0.88 | 1 (0.88) | ||
| 11(8) | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2.29 | →0.34 | 1 (0.34) | ||
| 12(35) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2.90 | →0.15 | 3 (0.38) | ||
| 13(23) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2.77 | →0.19 | 3 (0.28) | ||
| 14(27) | - | - | - | 16 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1.23 | 0.82 | 1 (0.82) | ||
| 15(9) | - | - | - | 9 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2.12 | →0.37 | 1 (0.37) | ||
| S3 | 1(36) | 3 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 3 | 2 | 24 | 1.86 | →0.39 | 2 (0.42) | |
| 2(22) | 3 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 1.54 | 0.52 | 1 (0.52) | ||
| 3(22) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2.43 | →0.15 | 2 (0.46) | ||
| 4(25) | 3 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.20 | 0.86 | 1 (0.86) | ||
| 5(27) | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2.36 | →0.06 | 2 (0.62) | ||
| 6(19) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2.42 | →0.11 | 2 (0.51) | ||
| 7(19) | - | - | - | 19 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1.06 | 0.94 | 1 (0.94) | ||
| S4 | 1(14) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.16 | 0.86 | 1 (0.86) | |
| 2(39) | 1 | 2 | 1 | 39 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1.75 | →0.29 | 2 (0.67) | ||
| 3(15) | - | - | - | 15 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1.15 | 0.86 | 1 (0.86) | ||
| 4(4) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.61 | 0.60 | 1 (0.60) | ||
| 5(27) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2.21 | →0 | 2 (0.81) | ||
| 6(4) | - | - | - | 4 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 1.49 | 0.67 | 1 (0.67) | ||
→denotes that the probability of mixed paternity is higher than 50% based on estimates;
*denotes that there is indication of skewed proportions of paternity among males siring offspring in the clutch.