Literature DB >> 9037044

The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences.

M Kirkpatrick1, N H Barton.   

Abstract

An important but controversial class of hypotheses concerning the evolution of female preferences for extreme male mating displays involves "indirect selection." Even in the absence of direct fitness effects, preference for males with high overall fitness can spread via a genetic correlation that develops between preference alleles and high fitness genotypes. Here we develop a quantitative expression for the force of indirect selection that (i) applies to any female mating behavior, (ii) is relatively insensitive to the underlying genetics, and (iii) is based on measurable quantities. In conjunction with the limited data now available, it suggests that the evolutionary force generated by indirect selection on preferences is weak in absolute terms. This finding raises the possibility that direct selection on preference genes may often be more important than indirect selection, but more data on the quantities identified by our model and on direct selection are needed to decide the question.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9037044      PMCID: PMC19782          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  11 in total

1.  Natural and sexual selection on many loci.

Authors:  N H Barton; M Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Attainment of Quasi Linkage Equilibrium When Gene Frequencies Are Changing by Natural Selection.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Rates of evolution: effects of time and temporal scaling.

Authors:  P D Gingerich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Theories of sexual selection.

Authors:  J M Smith
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  The evolution of one- and two-locus systems.

Authors:  T Nagylaki
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The costs of choice in sexual selection.

Authors:  A Pomiankowski
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1987-09-21       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Selection and covariance.

Authors:  G R Price
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites?

Authors:  W D Hamilton; M Zuk
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Genetic consequences of mate choice: a quantitative genetic method for testing sexual selection theory.

Authors:  C R Boake
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-03-01       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  86 in total

1.  The immunocompetence handicap hypothesis: testing the genetic predictions

Authors: 
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Evolution of the genetic covariance between male and female components of mate recognition: an experimental test.

Authors:  M W Blows
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Male-male competition and parental care in collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis): an experiment controlling for differences in territory quality.

Authors:  A Qvarnström; S C Grifffith; L Gustafsson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes.

Authors:  David Houle; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Reinforcement and divergence under assortative mating.

Authors:  M Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Parental care and adaptive brood sex ratio manipulation in birds.

Authors:  Dennis Hasselquist; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  A model of the interaction between 'good genes' and direct benefits in courtship-feeding animals: when do males of high genetic quality invest less?

Authors:  Luc F Bussière
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Density-dependent competition and selection on immune function in genetic lizard morphs.

Authors:  E Svensson; B Sinervo; T Comendant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Positive genetic correlation between female preference and offspring fitness.

Authors:  Emma Hine; Shelly Lachish; Megan Higgie; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition.

Authors:  Mark W Blows
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.