Literature DB >> 17032276

Postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance by female crickets only revealed by molecular markers.

Leigh W Simmons1, Maxine Beveridge, Nina Wedell, Tom Tregenza.   

Abstract

Multiple mating is thought to provide an opportunity for females to avoid the costs of genetic incompatibility by postcopulatory selection of compatible sperm haplotypes. Few studies have tested the genetic incompatibility hypothesis directly. Here we experimentally manipulated the compatibility of females with their mates using the gryllid cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. We recorded the hatching success of eggs laid by females mated with two nonsibling males, two siblings, or one nonsibling male and one sibling. In contrast with two previous studies on crickets that have adopted this approach, the hatching success of eggs did not differ between females mated with two full siblings and females mated with two unrelated males, indicating that embryo viability was not a cost of inbreeding in this species. We assigned paternity to offspring produced by females mated to both a sibling and a nonsibling male using microsatellite markers. As in previous studies of this species, we were unable to detect any difference in the proportion of offspring sired by the 1st and the 2nd male to mate with a female when females were unrelated to their mates. However, in our experimental matings the proportion of offspring sired by the nonsibling male depended on his sequence position. Paternity was biased toward the nonsibling male when he mated first. Our data show that molecular analyses of paternity are essential to detect subtle mechanisms of postcopulatory sexual selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17032276     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03035.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  22 in total

1.  The existence of species rests on a metastable equilibrium between inbreeding and outbreeding. An essay on the close relationship between speciation, inbreeding and recessive mutations.

Authors:  Etienne Joly
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.540

2.  No postcopulatory response to inbreeding by male crickets.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Melissa L Thomas
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Maternal inheritance, epigenetics and the evolution of polyandry.

Authors:  Jeanne A Zeh; David W Zeh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Sperm competitiveness in frogs: slow and steady wins the race.

Authors:  Martin A Dziminski; J Dale Roberts; Maxine Beveridge; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Inbreeding and the evolution of sociality in arthropods.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Tabadkani; Jamasb Nozari; Mathieu Lihoreau
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-08-23

6.  Sperm swimming velocity predicts competitive fertilization success in the green swordtail Xiphophorus helleri.

Authors:  Clelia Gasparini; Leigh W Simmons; Maxine Beveridge; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cryptic preference for MHC-dissimilar females in male red junglefowl, Gallus gallus.

Authors:  Mark A F Gillingham; David S Richardson; Hanne Løvlie; Anna Moynihan; Kirsty Worley; Tom Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Inbreeding avoidance drives consistent variation of fine-scale genetic structure caused by dispersal in the seasonal mating system of Brandt's voles.

Authors:  Xiao Hui Liu; Ling Fen Yue; Da Wei Wang; Ning Li; Lin Cong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Obligately silent males sire more offspring than singers in a rapidly evolving cricket population.

Authors:  Justa L Heinen-Kay; Ellen M Urquhart; Marlene Zuk
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Meta-analytic evidence that animals rarely avoid inbreeding.

Authors:  Raïssa A de Boer; Regina Vega-Trejo; Alexander Kotrschal; John L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 15.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.