Literature DB >> 10973716

The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects.

.   

Abstract

Theory suggests that male fitness generally increases steadily with mating rate, while one or a few matings are sufficient for females to maximize their reproductive success. Contrary to these predictions, however, females of the majority of insects mate multiply. We performed a meta-analysis of 122 experimental studies addressing the direct effects of multiple mating on female fitness in insects. Our results clearly show that females gain directly from multiple matings in terms of increased lifetime offspring production. Despite a negative effect of remating on female longevity in species without nuptial feeding, the positive effects (increased egg production rate and fertility) more than outweigh this negative effect for moderate mating rates. The average direct net fitness gain of multiple mating was as high as 30-70%. Therefore, the evolutionary maintenance of polyandry in insects can be understood solely in terms of direct effects. However, our results also strongly support the existence of an intermediate optimal female mating rate, beyond which a further elevated mating rate is deleterious. The existence of such optima implies that sexual conflict over the mating rate should be very common in insects, and that sexually antagonistic coevolution plays a key role in the evolution of mating systems and of many reproductive traits. We discuss the origin and maintenance of nuptial feeing in the light of our findings, and suggest that elaborate and nutritional ejaculates may be the result of sexually antagonistic coevolution. Future research should aim at gaining a quantitative understanding of the evolution of female mating rates. Copyright 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 10973716     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  225 in total

1.  The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict.

Authors:  S Gavrilets; G Arnqvist; U Friberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Genetic divergence of the seminal signal-receptor system in houseflies: the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution?

Authors:  J A Andrés; G Arnqvist
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A nonspecific fatty acid within the bumblebee mating plug prevents females from remating.

Authors:  B Baer; E D Morgan; P Schmid-Hempel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The evolution of risky behaviour in the presence of a sexually transmitted disease.

Authors:  Michael Boots; Robert J Knell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Female age and sperm competition: last-male precedence declines as female age increases.

Authors:  Paul D Mack; Nicholas K Priest; Daniel E L Promislow
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The influence of maternal effects on indirect benefits associated with polyandry.

Authors:  Clarissa M House; Bronwyn H Bleakley; Craig A Walling; Thomas A R Price; Clare E Stamper; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Superior sperm competitors sire higher-quality young.

Authors:  D J Hosken; T W J Garner; T Tregenza; N Wedell; P I Ward
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Nonlinear and correlational sexual selection on 'honest' female ornamentation.

Authors:  Natasha R LeBas; Leon R Hockham; Michael G Ritchie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Detecting sexually antagonistic coevolution with population crosses.

Authors:  Locke Rowe; Erin Cameron; Troy Day
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Male contributions during mating increase female survival in the disease vector mosquito Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  Susan M Villarreal; Sylvie Pitcher; Michelle E H Helinski; Lynn Johnson; Mariana F Wolfner; Laura C Harrington
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.354

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.