Literature DB >> 19425678

Objective measures for predicting speech intelligibility in noisy conditions based on new band-importance functions.

Jianfen Ma1, Yi Hu, Philipos C Loizou.   

Abstract

The articulation index (AI), speech-transmission index (STI), and coherence-based intelligibility metrics have been evaluated primarily in steady-state noisy conditions and have not been tested extensively in fluctuating noise conditions. The aim of the present work is to evaluate the performance of new speech-based STI measures, modified coherence-based measures, and AI-based measures operating on short-term (30 ms) intervals in realistic noisy conditions. Much emphasis is placed on the design of new band-importance weighting functions which can be used in situations wherein speech is corrupted by fluctuating maskers. The proposed measures were evaluated with intelligibility scores obtained by normal-hearing listeners in 72 noisy conditions involving noise-suppressed speech (consonants and sentences) corrupted by four different maskers (car, babble, train, and street interferences). Of all the measures considered, the modified coherence-based measures and speech-based STI measures incorporating signal-specific band-importance functions yielded the highest correlations (r=0.89-0.94). The modified coherence measure, in particular, that only included vowel/consonant transitions and weak consonant information yielded the highest correlation (r=0.94) with sentence recognition scores. The results from this study clearly suggest that the traditional AI and STI indices could benefit from the use of the proposed signal- and segment-dependent band-importance functions.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19425678      PMCID: PMC2806444          DOI: 10.1121/1.3097493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Intensity-importance functions for bandlimited monosyllabic words.

Authors:  Gerald A Studebaker; Robert L Sherbecoe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effect of talker and speaking style on the speech transmission index.

Authors:  Sander J van Wijngaarden; Tammo Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  On using coherence to measure distortion in hearing aids.

Authors:  J M Kates
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Prediction of intelligibility of non-linearly processed speech.

Authors:  C Ludvigsen; C Elberling; G Keidser; T Poulsen
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1990

5.  The short-time articulation index.

Authors:  J M Kates
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1987

6.  Derivation of primary parameters and procedures for use in speech intelligibility predictions.

Authors:  C V Pavlovic
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality.

Authors:  H J Steeneken; T Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Modeling the judgment of vowel quality differences.

Authors:  R A Bladon; B Lindblom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The contribution of obstruent consonants and acoustic landmarks to speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  32 in total

1.  Neural decoding of attentional selection in multi-speaker environments without access to clean sources.

Authors:  James O'Sullivan; Zhuo Chen; Jose Herrero; Guy M McKhann; Sameer A Sheth; Ashesh D Mehta; Nima Mesgarani
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Adaptive bandwidth measurements of importance functions for speech intelligibility prediction.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Whitmal; Kristina DeRoy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Analysis of a simplified normalized covariance measure based on binary weighting functions for predicting the intelligibility of noise-suppressed speech.

Authors:  Fei Chen; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Adaptive Noise Suppression of Pediatric Lung Auscultations With Real Applications to Noisy Clinical Settings in Developing Countries.

Authors:  Dimitra Emmanouilidou; Eric D McCollum; Daniel E Park; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Contributions of cochlea-scaled entropy and consonant-vowel boundaries to prediction of speech intelligibility in noise.

Authors:  Fei Chen; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Objective speech intelligibility measurement for cochlear implant users in complex listening environments.

Authors:  João F Santos; Stefano Cosentino; Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou; Tiago H Falk
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.017

7.  Comparison of a short-time speech-based intelligibility metric to the speech transmission index and intelligibility data.

Authors:  Karen L Payton; Mona Shrestha
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Reasons why current speech-enhancement algorithms do not improve speech intelligibility and suggested solutions.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Gibak Kim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2011

9.  Extending the articulation index to account for non-linear distortions introduced by noise-suppression algorithms.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Jianfen Ma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.

Authors:  Fei Chen; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.