Literature DB >> 22225313

Dosimetric performance and array assessment of plastic scintillation detectors for stereotactic radiosurgery quality assurance.

Jean-Christophe Gagnon1, Dany Thériault, Mathieu Guillot, Louis Archambault, Sam Beddar, Luc Gingras, Luc Beaulieu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the performance of plastic scintillation detectors (PSD) for quality assurance (QA) in stereotactic radiosurgery conditions to a microion-chamber (IC), Gafchromic EBT2 films, 60 008 shielded photon diode (SD) and unshielded diodes (UD), and assess a new 2D crosshair array prototype adapted to small field dosimetry.
METHODS: The PSD consists of a 1 mm diameter by 1 mm long scintillating fiber (BCF-60, Saint-Gobain, Inc.) coupled to a polymethyl-methacrylate optical fiber (Eska premier, Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Output factors (S(c,p)) for apertures used in radiosurgery ranging from 4 to 40 mm in diameter have been measured. The PSD crosshair array (PSDCA) is a water equivalent device made up of 49 PSDs contained in a 1.63 cm radius area. Dose profiles measurements were taken for radiosurgery fields using the PSDCA and were compared to other dosimeters. Moreover, a typical stereotactic radiosurgery treatment using four noncoplanar arcs was delivered on a spherical phantom in which UD, IC, or PSD was placed. Using the Xknife planning system (Integra Radionics Burlington, MA), 15 Gy was prescribed at the isocenter, where each detector was positioned.
RESULTS: Output Factors measured by the PSD have a mean difference of 1.3% with Gafchromic EBT2 when normalized to a 10 × 10 cm(2) field, and 1.0% when compared with UD measurements normalized to the 35 mm diameter cone. Dose profiles taken with the PSD crosshair array agreed with other single detectors dose profiles in spite of the presence of the 49 PSDs. Gamma values comparing 1D dose profiles obtained with PSD crosshair array with Gafchromic EBT2 and UD measured profiles shows 98.3% and 100.0%, respectively, of detector passing the gamma acceptance criteria of 0.3 mm and 2%. The dose measured by the PSD for a complete stereotactic radiosurgery treatment is comparable to the planned dose corrected for its SD-based S(c,p) within 1.4% and 0.7% for 5 and 35 mm diameter cone, respectively. Furthermore, volume averaging of the IC can be observed for the 5 mm aperture where it differs by as much as 9.1% compared to the PSD measurement. The angular dependency of the UD is also observed, unveiled by an under-response around 2.5% of both 5 and 35 mm apertures.
CONCLUSIONS: Output Factors and dose profiles measurements performed, respectively, with the PSD and the PSDCA were in agreement with those obtained with the UD and EBT2 films. For stereotactic radiosurgery treatment verification, the PSD gives accurate results compared to the planning system and the IC once the latter is corrected to compensate for the averaging effect of the IC. The PSD provides precise results when used as a single detector or in a dense array, resulting in a great potential for stereotactic radiosurgery QA measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22225313     DOI: 10.1118/1.3666765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

Review 1.  A review of recent advances in optical fibre sensors for in vivo dosimetry during radiotherapy.

Authors:  S O'Keeffe; D McCarthy; P Woulfe; M W D Grattan; A R Hounsell; D Sporea; L Mihai; I Vata; G Leen; E Lewis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Dosimetric characterization and behaviour in small X-ray fields of a microchamber and a plastic scintillator detector.

Authors:  Massimo Pasquino; Claudia Cutaia; Lorenzo Radici; Serena Valzano; Eva Gino; Carlo Cavedon; Michele Stasi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Influence of Jaw Setting in the Determination of Stereotactic Small-Field Output Factors with Different Detectors.

Authors:  Seby George; Y Retna Ponmalar; Henry Finlay Godson; A Sathish Kumar; B Paul Ravindran
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2022-03-31

4.  Determination of the quenching correction factors for plastic scintillation detectors in therapeutic high-energy proton beams.

Authors:  L L W Wang; L A Perles; L Archambault; N Sahoo; D Mirkovic; S Beddar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Variation of kQclin,Qmsr (fclin,fmsr) for the small-field dosimetric parameters percentage depth dose, tissue-maximum ratio, and off-axis ratio.

Authors:  Paolo Francescon; Sam Beddar; Ninfa Satariano; Indra J Das
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Optical fibre sensors: their role in in vivo dosimetry for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  P Woulfe; F J Sullivan; S O'Keeffe
Journal:  Cancer Nanotechnol       Date:  2016-10-18

7.  Small field detector correction factors: effects of the flattening filter for Elekta and Varian linear accelerators.

Authors:  Madelaine K Tyler; Paul Z Y Liu; Christopher Lee; David R McKenzie; Natalka Suchowerska
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Percent depth-dose distribution discrepancies from very small volume ion chambers.

Authors:  Vikren Sarkar; Brian Wang; Hui Zhao; Bart Lynch; Joshua A James; Kiernan T McCullough; Bill J Salter
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  High spatial resolution inorganic scintillator detector for high-energy X-ray beam at small field irradiation.

Authors:  Sree Bash Chandra Debnath; Carole Fauquet; Agnes Tallet; Anthony Goncalves; Sébastien Lavandier; Franck Jandard; Didier Tonneau; Julien Darreon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.071

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.