Literature DB >> 27826990

Dosimetric characterization and behaviour in small X-ray fields of a microchamber and a plastic scintillator detector.

Massimo Pasquino1, Claudia Cutaia1, Lorenzo Radici1, Serena Valzano1, Eva Gino1, Carlo Cavedon2, Michele Stasi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to investigate the main dosimetric characteristics and the performance of an A26 Exradin ionization microchamber (A26 IC) and a W1 Exradin plastic scintillation detector (W1 PSD) in small photon beam dosimetry for treatment planning system commissioning and quality assurance programme.
METHODS: Detector characterization measurements (short-term stability, dose linearity, angular dependence and energy dependence) were performed in water for field sizes up to 10 × 10 cm2. Polarity effect (Ppol) was examined for the A26 IC. The behaviour of the detectors in small field relative dosimetry [percentage depth dose, dose profiles often called the off-axis ratio and output factors (OFs)] was investigated for field sizes ranging from 1 × 1 to 3 × 3 cm2.
RESULTS: Results were compared with those obtained with other detectors we already use for small photon beam dosimetry. A26 IC and W1 PSD showed a linear dose response. While the A26 IC showed no energy dependence, the W1 PSD showed energy dependence within 2%; no angular dependence was registered. Ppol values for A26 IC were below 0.9% (0.5% for field size >2 × 2 cm2). A26 IC and W1 PSD depth-dose curves and lateral profiles agreed with those obtained with an EDGE diode. No differences were observed among the detectors in OF measurement for field sizes larger than 1 × 1 cm2, with average differences <1%. For field sizes <1 × 1 cm2, the effective volume of ionization chamber and non-water equivalence of EDGE diode become significant. A26 IC OF values were significantly lower than EDGE diode and W1 PSD values, with percentage differences of about -23 and -13% for the smallest field, respectively. W1 PSD OF values lay between ion chambers and diode values, with a maximum percentage difference of about -10% with respect to the EDGE diode, for a 6 × 6-mm2 field size.
CONCLUSION: The results of our investigation confirm that A26 IC and W1 PSD could play an important role in small field relative dosimetry. Advances in knowledge: Dosimetric characteristics of Exradin A26 ionization microchamber and W1 plastic scintillation detector for small field dosimetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27826990      PMCID: PMC5605031          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  40 in total

1.  Measurement of ionization chamber absorbed dose k(Q) factors in megavoltage photon beams.

Authors:  Malcolm R McEwen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Influence of detector size in photon beam profile measurements.

Authors:  C H Sibata; H C Mota; A S Beddar; P D Higgins; K H Shin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Correction factor measurements for multiple detectors used in small field dosimetry on the Varian Edge radiosurgery system.

Authors:  Sean Tanny; Nicholas Sperling; E Ishmael Parsai
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A new formalism for reference dosimetry of small and nonstandard fields.

Authors:  R Alfonso; P Andreo; R Capote; M Saiful Huq; W Kilby; P Kjäll; T R Mackie; H Palmans; K Rosser; J Seuntjens; W Ullrich; S Vatnitsky
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Spectral method for the correction of the Cerenkov light effect in plastic scintillation detectors: a comparison study of calibration procedures and validation in Cerenkov light-dominated situations.

Authors:  Mathieu Guillot; Luc Gingras; Louis Archambault; Sam Beddar; Luc Beaulieu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Simulation of the precision limits of plastic scintillation detectors using optimal component selection.

Authors:  Frédéric Lacroix; Luc Beaulieu; Louis Archambault; A Sam Beddar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Experimental determination of the effect of detector size on profile measurements in narrow photon beams.

Authors:  E Pappas; T G Maris; A Papadakis; F Zacharopoulou; J Damilakis; N Papanikolaou; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Water-equivalent plastic scintillation detectors for high-energy beam dosimetry: II. Properties and measurements.

Authors:  A S Beddar; T R Mackie; F H Attix
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Variation of kQclin,Qmsr (fclin,fmsr) for the small-field dosimetric parameters percentage depth dose, tissue-maximum ratio, and off-axis ratio.

Authors:  Paolo Francescon; Sam Beddar; Ninfa Satariano; Indra J Das
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Mass-density compensation can improve the performance of a range of different detectors under non-equilibrium conditions.

Authors:  T S A Underwood; H C Winter; M A Hill; J D Fenwick
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.